Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T21:46:34.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for Yield Stability in Selected Landraces of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

Eric Ayeh
Affiliation:
Bunda College of Agriculture, Box 219, Lilongwe, Malawi

Summary

Yield stability in beans from diverse sources in Malawi was estimated using the statistical parameters of genotype X environment variance, slope and standard error from regression. The heterozygous F2 and the most complex synthetic mixture were very stable, although not significantly different from some pure genotypes. The mean yields of most mixtures were marginally higher than the average of their components. There was a linear relationship between magnitude of diversity and stability. Evidence for heterozygote advantage was demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. W., Ayeh, E. & Edje, O. T. (1986). Genetic diversity in common bean landraces in Malawi. (In review).Google Scholar
Allard, R. W. (1961). Relationship between genetic diversity and consistency of performance in different environments. Science 1:127133Google Scholar
Allard, R. W. & Hansche, P. E. (1964). Some parameters of population viability and their implications in plant breeding. Advances in Agronomy 16:281325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayeh, E. (1986). Seed mixtures of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Malawi. Bunda Journal of Agricultural Research 1:2838Google Scholar
Breese, E. L. & Hill, J. (1973). Regression analysis of interaction between competing species. Heredity 31:181200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, R. E. & Allard, R. W. (1969). A comparison of the performance of homogeneous and heterogeneous barley populations. Crop Science 9:407412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, S. A. & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6:3640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14:742754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, J. & Growell, J. G. (1975). Breeding implications of the relationship between competitive ability and pure culture yield in self pollinated grain crops. Euphytica 24:221228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, J. F. (1984). Yield stability in ten cultivars of strawberry. Michigan State University Experimental Station Journal Article No. 11441.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, P. E. (1983). Modified stability of farmer managed, on-farm trials. Agronomy Journal 76:271274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isleib, T. G. (1986). A fixed-effect analysis of genotype-environment interaction on soybeans (Glycine max. Merr.). (In review).Google Scholar
Marshall, D. R. & Brown, A. H. D. (1973). Stability performance of mixtures and multilines. Euphytica 22:405412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. B. (1984). Genetic diversity of bean landraces in Northern Malawi. MSc thesis, Michigan State University, E. Lansing.Google Scholar
Shukla, G. K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29:237245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A. J. (1982). Some implications of first-order model of inter-plant competition for the means and variances of complex mixtures. Theoretical Applied Genetics 64:9196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, A. J. (1983). The expected efficiencies of some methods of selection of components for inter-genotypic mixtures. Theoretical Applied Genetics 67:4552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed