Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T05:17:49.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BIOMASS PRODUCTION AND N-USE OF FIBRE SORGHUM UNDER DIFFERENT COVER CROPPING MANAGEMENT, NITROGEN INFLUXES AND SOIL TYPES IN CENTRAL GREECE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2013

D. F. BESLEMES*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, Laboratory of Agronomy and Applied Crop Physiology, University of Thessaly, Fytocou Str., Volos 38446, Greece
E. L. TIGKA
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Agricultural Environment, Laboratory of Biometry, University of Thessaly, Fytocou Str., Volos 38446, Greece
P. EFTHIMIADIS
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Laboratory of Crop Production, Agricultural University of Athens, 75 Iera Odos Str., Athens 11855, Greece
N. G. DANALATOS
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Environment, Laboratory of Agronomy and Applied Crop Physiology, University of Thessaly, Fytocou Str., Volos 38446, Greece
*
Corresponding author. Email: d_beslemes@yahoo.gr

Summary

Field experiments were carried out over a period of three years to evaluate the effect of cover cropping faba bean with fibre sorghum, compared to mono-crop cultivation, on yield (dry matter), nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE) and N fertilizer recovery fraction of sorghum. Experimental sites were located in central Greece on a fertile, clayey to loamy textured soil, and on a sandy soil of moderate fertility. A factorial combination of four nitrogen application rates (0, 50, 100, 150 kg ha−1) and three legume treatments (incorporated into the topsoil or harvested before the sowing of sorghum and mono-cropping) were tested in a split plot design in three blocks. The results showed importance of legume cover crops for both soil types as sorghum total dry biomass yield for clayey soil fluctuated from 23 to 27 t ha−1 for control plots, from 25.2 to 30.9 t ha−1 when faba bean was harvested and from 26.3 to 32.5 t ha−1 when incorporated, and for sandy soil the yield fluctuated from 18.1 to 22.1 t ha−1 for control plots, from 22 to 27 t ha−1 when faba bean was harvested and from 23.1 to 28.1 t ha−1 when incorporated. The NUE was estimated at 62 kg kg−1 and 60 kg kg−1 for clayey and sandy soils respectively. The N recovery fraction was doubled after incorporating faba bean as green manure, reaching large amounts for both soil types.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adger, W. N., Pettenella, D. and Whitby, M. (1997). Land use in Europe and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. In Climate-Change Mitigation and European Land-Use Policies, 122 (EdsAdger, W. N., Pettnella, D. and Whitby, M.). Oxon, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Barbanti, L., Grandi, S., Vecchi, A. and Venturi, G. (2006). Sweet and fibre sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), energy crops in the frame of environmental protection from excessive nitrogen loads. European Journal of Agronomy 25:3039.Google Scholar
Bilalis, D., Sidiras, N., Economou, G. and Vakali, C. (2003). Effect of different levels of wheat straw soil surface coverage on weed flora in Vicia faba crops. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189:233241.Google Scholar
Biomass Energy Centre. (2007). Available at: www.biomassenergycentre.org.uk (accessed 2 March 2012).Google Scholar
Bouwman, A. F. (1996). Direct emission of nitrous oxide from agricultural soil. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 46:5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, E. and van Kessel, C. (1992). Plant available nitrogen from lentil and wheat residues during a subsequent growing season. Soil Science Society of America Journal 56:11551160.Google Scholar
Bundy, L. G. and Andraski, T. W. (1993). Soil and plant nitrogen availability tests for corn following alfalfa. Journal of Production Agriculture 6:200206.Google Scholar
Burger, M. and Jackson, L. E. (2004). Plant and microbial nitrogen use and turnover: rapid conversion of nitrate to ammonium in soil with roots. Plant and Soil 266:289301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatziathanassiou, A., Christou, M., Alexopoulou, E. and Zafiris, C. (1998). Biomass and sugar yields of sweet sorghum in Greece. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, 209212 (Eds Chartier et al.). Germany: CARMEN Press.Google Scholar
Cosentino, S. L., Mantineo, M. and Testa, G. (2012). Water and nitrogen balance of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor moench (L.)) cv. Keller under semi-arid conditions. Industrial Crops and Products 36:329342.Google Scholar
Crews, T. E. and Peoples, M. B. (2005). Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer-based agroecosystems? A review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (Springer): 72:101120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curt, M. D., Fernandez, J. and Martinez, M. (1995). Productivity and water use efficiency of sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench) cv. “Keller” in relation to water regime. Biomass and Bioenergy 6 (8):401409.Google Scholar
Daimon, H. (2006). Traits of the genus crotalaria used as a green manure legume on sustainable cropping systems. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 40 (4):299305.Google Scholar
Dalianis, C., Christou, M., Sooter, S., Kyritsis, S., Zafiris, Ch. and Samiotakis, G. (1994). Growth and productivity of sweet sorghum in Greece. In Proceedings of the Seventh EU Biomass Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, 636642 (Eds. Hall et al.). Bochum, Germany: Ponte Press.Google Scholar
Danalatos, N. (1993). Quantified Analysis of Selected Land Use Systems in the Larissa Region, Greece. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (ISBN 90-5485-063-9).Google Scholar
De Wit, C. T. (1992). Resource use efficiency in agriculture. Agricultural Systems 40:125151.Google Scholar
Dolciotti, I., Marbelli, S., Grandi, S. and Venturi, G. (1996). Comparison of two Sorghum genotypes for sugar and fiber production. Industrial Crops and Products 7:265272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, M. P., Fernando, A. L., Guimaraes, H., Amparo, V., Alves, L. and Santos Oliveira, J. F. (2000). Study of sweet and fiber surghum in Portugal. Effect of climatic conditions and sowing date on the final productivity and on quality of the biomass. In Proceedings of the First World Conference on Biomass for Energy and Industry, Sevilla, Spain, June 5–9, 361–364.Google Scholar
Flessa, H., Ruser, R., Dörsch, P., Kampb, T., Jimenez, M. A., Munchb, J. C.et al. (2002). Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 91:175189.Google Scholar
Giller, K. E. (2001). Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems, 169187. New York, NY: CABI.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Neeteson, J. J. and Draycott, A. (1985). Response of potatoes to N fertilizer: quantitative relations for components of growth. Plant and Soil 18:185203.Google Scholar
Hattori, T. and Morita, S. (2010). Energy crops for sustainable bioethanol production; which, where and how?. Plant Production Science 13 (3):221234.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. J., Martin, R. J. and Goh, K. M. (1993). Nitrogen fixation, accumulation of soil nitrogen and nitrogen balance for some field grown legumes crops. Field Crops Research 35:8592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helenius, J. (1990). Plant size, nutrient composition and biomass productivity of oats and faba bean in intercropping and the effect of controlling Rhopalosiphum padi on these properties. Journal of Agricultural Science in Finland 62:2131.Google Scholar
Jensen, E. S. and Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2003). How can increased use of biological N2 fixation in agriculture benefit the environment. Plant and Soil 252:177186.Google Scholar
Kirchmann, H. and Bergqvist, R. (1989). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization of white clover plants (Trifolium repens) of different age during aerobic incubation with soil. Zeitschrift Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde 152:283288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosmas, C., Danalatos, , Gerontidis, N. G. and St, . (2000). The effect of land parameters on vegetation performance and degree of erosion under Mediterranean conditions. Catena 40:317.Google Scholar
Kramer, K. J., Moll, H. C. and Nonhebel, S. (1999). Total greenhouse gas emissions related to the Dutch crop production system. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 72:916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuesters, J. and Lammel, J. (1999). Investigations of the energy efficiency of the production of winter wheat and sugar beet in Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 11:3543.Google Scholar
Magdoff, F. R. (1991). Understanding the Magdoff pre-sidedress nitrate test for corn. Journal of Production Agriculture 4:297305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masclaux, C., Quillere', I., Gallais, A. and Hirel, B. (2001). The challenge of remobilization in plant nitrogen economy. A survey of physioagronomic and molecular approaches. Annals of Applied Biology 138:6981.Google Scholar
Miller, P. R., Gan, Y., McConkey, B. G. and McDonald, C. L. (2003). Pulse crops for the northern Great Plains: I. Grain productivity and residual effects on soil water and nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 95:972979.Google Scholar
Moll, R. H., Kamprath, E. J. and Jackson, W. A. (1983). Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal 74:562564.Google Scholar
Monti, A. and Venturi, G. (2003). Comparison of energy performance of fibre sorghum, sweet sorghum and wheat monocultures in northern Italy. European Journal of Agronomy 19:3543.Google Scholar
Muchow, R. C. (1988). Effect of nitrogen supply on the comparative productivity of maize and sorghum in a semi-arid tropical environment. III. Grain yield and nitrogen accumulation. Field Crops Research 18:3143.Google Scholar
Muchow, R. C. (1998). Nitrogen utilization efficiency in maize and grain sorghum. Field Crops Research 56:209216.Google Scholar
Muchow, R. C. (1990). Effect of nitrogen on partitioning and yield in grain sorghum under differing environmental conditions in the semi-arid tropics. Field Crops Research 25:265278.Google Scholar
Mullen, R. W., Freeman, K. W., Raun, W. R., Johnson, G. V., Stone, M. L. and Solie, J. B. (2003). Identifying an in season response index and the potential to increase wheat yield with nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 95:347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, R. J. K. (1978). Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition of dryland grain sorghum at Katherine, Northern Territory: I. Effect of rate of nitrogen fertilizer. Animal Production Science 18 (93):554563.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. (1973). Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agronomy Journal 65 (1):109112.Google Scholar
Pala, M., Saxena, M. C., Papastylianou, I. and Jaradat, A. A. (1994). Enhancing the use of cool season food legumes in different farming systems. In Expanding the Use of Cool Season Food Legumes, 130143 (Eds. Muhlbauer, F. J. and Kaiser, W. J.). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Prithiviraj, B., Carruthers, K., Fe, Q., Cloutier Martin, R. C. and Smith, D. (2000). Intercropping of corn with soybean and lupin for silage: effect of seedling date on yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185:29136.Google Scholar
Reed, W., Geng, S. and Hills, F. J. (1986). Energy input and output analysis of four field crops in California. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 157:99104.Google Scholar
Salmeron-Miranda, F., Bath, B., Eckersten, H., Forkman, J. and Wivstad, M. (2007). Above ground nitrogen in relation to estimated total plant uptake in maize and bean. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 79:125139.Google Scholar
Schröder, J. J., Neeteson, J. J., Oenema, O. and Struik, P. C. (2000). Does the crop or the soil indicate how to save nitrogen in maize production? Reviewing the state of the art. Field Crops Research 66:151164.Google Scholar
Schröder, J. J., Van Dijk, W. and De Groot, W. J. M. (1996). Effects of cover crops on the nitrogen influxes in a silage maize production system. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 44:293315.Google Scholar
Schulten, H. R. and Schnitzer, , , M. (1998). The chemistry of soil organic nitrogen: a review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 26:115.Google Scholar
Sequi, P. and Vittori-Antisari, L. (1989). Dinamismo chimico dell'azoto: aspetti agronomici e ambientali. Rivista-di-Agronomia 23:3042 (in Italian).Google Scholar
Soil Survey Staff. (2010). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 11th edn.Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Steel, R. D. G. and Torrie, J. H. (1982). Principles and Procedure of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach, 2nd edn.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 633 pp.Google Scholar
Stute, J. K. and Posner, J. L. (1995). Synchrony between legume nitrogen release and corn demand in the upper Midwest. Agronomy Journal 87:10631069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USDA. (1975). Soil Taxonomy, Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, Agricultural Handbook 754. Washington, DC: USDA, 466 pp.Google Scholar
Van Keulen, H. (1982). Graphical analysis of annual crop response to fertiliser application. Agricultural Systems 9:11126.Google Scholar
Walley, F., Yates, T., van Groeningen, J. W. and van Kessel, C. (2002). Relationships between soil nitrogen availability indices, yield, and nitrogen accumulation of wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:15491561.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32:110.Google Scholar
Williams, J. H., Nageswara Rao, R. C., Dougbedji, F. and Talwar, H. S. (1996). Radiation interception and modeling as an alternative to destructive samples in crop growth measurements. Annals of Applied Biology 129:151160.Google Scholar