Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T11:45:10.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Treatment efficacy with paliperidone palmitate in patients after the first psychotic episode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

S. Galiano Rus*
Affiliation:
Servicio Andaluz de Salud-UGC Jaén Norte, Unidad de Salud Mental Hospitalaria San Juan de la Cruz, Úbeda-Jaén, Spain
A. Soler Iborte
Affiliation:
Servicio Andaluz de Salud-UGC Jaén Norte, Unidad de Salud Mental Comunitaria Linares, Linares-Jaén, Spain
S. García Marín
Affiliation:
Servicio Murciano de Salud, Unidad de Salud Mental Comunitaria Lorca, Lorca-Murcia, Spain
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

To evaluate factors of therapeutic efficacy of paliperidone palmitate, such as the speed of action and its maintenance in patients who experienced a first psychotic episode that led to a hospital admission in the acute unit.

Materials and methods

Two-year observational and descriptive study. Patients admitted to the Mental Health Hospital Unit (MHHU) from January 2013 to July 2014, with a first psychotic episode and under paliperidone palmitate treatment. Monitoring and evaluation six months after hospital discharge. They were evaluated using the PANSS and BPRS scales at four different time points of the evolutionary process.

Results

Average scores of the BPRS scale: 39 on admission day, 27 on day of discharge, 23 on the third month and 20 on the sixth month. Average score of PANSS scale: PANSS-PG: 64 on admission day, 48 on day of discharge, 25 on the 3rd month, and 20 on the 6th month. PANSS-P: 41 on admission day, 21 on day of discharge, 12 on the 3rd month, and 10 on the 6th month. PANSS-N: 21 on admission, 11 at discharge, 8 on 3rd month and 7 on 6th month. No clinically significant side effects were observed that would lead to the modification of the doses or the abandonment of the treatment in this period.

Conclusion

The results of this observational study show that the start of the treatment with PAP is associated with an observable clinical response on the 4th day. The evaluation scales at the 3rd and 6th months also suggest the maintenance of efficacy of the treatment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EV1010
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.