Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T01:01:43.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The European trainees’ perspective on psychiatric postgraduate education: An EFPT survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

A. Giurgiuca
Affiliation:
Carol Davila, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
T. Mogren*
Affiliation:
Länsvuxenpsykiatri Falun/Säter, Allmänpsykiatriska kliniken, Säter, Sweden
S. Tomori
Affiliation:
Mother Teresa, University Hospital Center, Tirana, Albania
L. Berze
Affiliation:
Rigas Stradins University, Daugavpils Psychoneurological Hospital, Riga, Latvia
A. Munjiza
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, psychiatry, Belgrade, Serbia
M. Pinto da Costa
Affiliation:
Hospital de Magalhães Lemos, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
E.F.P.T. TEO-PC Research WG
Affiliation:
EFPT, EFPT, Brussels, Belgium
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Despite efforts to unify psychiatric education among European member countries, there are still considerable variations between national training programmes. To ensure equivalence of training standards the current tendency of recommended guidelines and reports is steering psychiatric training towards becoming more competency focused.

Objectives

The research group of the European Federation of Psychiatric Trainees (EFPT) conducted a multi-national study on postgraduate psychiatry training. The aims are to assess the psychiatric trainees’ experiences and opinions on their national training and assessment methods in respect to the Union européenne des médecins spécialistes (UEMS) 2009 competencies framework.

Methods

This study surveyed 745 psychiatric trainees from 10 EFPT member countries using a questionnaire designed specifically for assessing this issue.

Results

In this sample, the majority are aware of having a competency based training programme but 86.5% are poorly acquainted with the UEMS competencies framework. All key competencies were rated as being important but not all as being relevant in the assessment process. One's level of preparedness and the degree of education one's receives during their training differs from one competency to another. Trainees who aren’t satisfied with their national training would be in favour of taking an end of training Pan-European exam which differs from the one's that are satisfied and wouldn’t be interested in undergoing this assessment method.

Conclusions

This sample isn’t fully acquainted with the competency-based concept for postgraduate training. The ones satisfied with their postgraduate psychiatric education seem to be less inclined to take an end of training Pan European exam.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW226
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.