Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T23:51:35.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3009 – Randomized, Double-blind, Study of Vortioxetine Versus Agomelatine in Adults with MDD after Inadequate Response to SSRI or SNRI Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

L. Häggström
Affiliation:
Psychiatric Clinic, Länssjukhuset, Halmstad, Sweden
R.Z. Nielsen
Affiliation:
H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark
M. Dragheim
Affiliation:
H. Lundbeck A/S, Valby, Denmark

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) is an investigational antidepressant, a multimodal 5-HT3, 5-HT7 and 5-HT1D receptor antagonist, 5-HT1B receptor partial agonist, 5-HT1A receptor agonist and inhibitor of the 5-HT transporter.

Objectives

To compare efficacy and tolerability of flexible-dose treatment with vortioxetine versus agomelatine in MDD patients who presented with an inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI monotherapy.

Aims

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 8 in MADRS total score analysed by MMRM using a non-inferiority test. Secondary endpoints included assessment of anxiety symptoms (HAM-A), global clinical judgment (CGI), and overall functioning (SDS).

Methods

Randomized, double-blind comparator study (NCT01488071).

Results

Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to vortioxetine (10-20mg/day) or agomelatine (25-50mg/day) for 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. On the primary efficacy endpoint, vortioxetine (n=252) was statistically significantly superior to agomelatine (n=241) (p< 0.05) by 2.2 MADRS points. Significant differences in favour of vortioxetine were found for the MADRS, HAM-A, CGI-S, CGI-I, and SDS from Week 4 onwards (FAS, MMRM; p< 0.05) and robustness was confirmed by significant differences by ANCOVA (FAS, LOCF). Fewer patients withdrew due to adverse events with vortioxetine (5.9%) than agomelatine (9.5%). Adverse events with the highest incidence were nausea, headache, dizziness and somnolence.

Conclusions

The primary efficacy endpoint of this comparator study was met, with vortioxetine also showing a significant benefit compared to agomelatine in MDD patients who changed antidepressant after an inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI treatment. Statistically significant differences were seen from Week 4 onwards. This study confirms that vortioxetine is efficacious and well-tolerated.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.