Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T18:44:24.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiabilidad interevaluador de la CIE-10 en pacientes chinos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

A. H. T. Pang ,
G. S. Ungvari ,
C. K. Wong  and
T. Leung
A. H. T. Pang
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Príncipe de Gales, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
G. S. Ungvari
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Príncipe de Gales, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
C. K. Wong
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Príncipe de Gales, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
T. Leung
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psiquiatría, Hospital Príncipe de Gales, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, China
Get access

Resumen

En un intento de evaluar la aplicabilidad universal de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-10), dos psiquiatras de origen sociocultural y formación diferentes realizaron independientemente una revisión de los historiales de 238 pacientes chinos. Las cifras de fiabilidad interevaluador fueron comparables a las encontradas en los ensayos de campo de la CIE-10 coordinados por la OMS. Los resultados indican que la «universalidad» de la CIE-10 en la práctica clínica de rutina es buena.

Keywords

CIE-10revisión de historialesfiabilidad interevaluador
Type
Artículo Original
Information
European Psychiatry (Ed. Española) , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , September 1997 , pp. 359 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Pang AHT, Ungvari GS, Wong CK, Leung T. Inter-rater reliability of ICD-10 in Chinese patients. Eur Psychiatry 1997; 12: 8-10

References

Bibliografia

Cohen, J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daradkeh, TK, Saad, A. The reliability of the ICD-10 psychiatric diagnoses. Nordic J Psychiat 1993; 47: 369-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, MB, Lavon, PW, Andreasen, N et al. Test-retest reliability of assessing psychiatrically ill patients in a multicenter design. J Psychiat Res 1981; 16: 213:27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendell, RE.The role o f Diagnosis in Psychiatry. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar
Kitamura, T, Shima, S, Sakio, E, Kato, M. Application of Research Diagnostic Criteria and International Classification of Disease to case vignettes. J Clin Psychiatry 1986; 47: 78-80.Google Scholar
Leckman, JF, Solomskas, D, Thompson, WD. Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982; 39: 879-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okasha, A, Sadek, A, Al-Haddad MK, Abdel-Mawgoud M. Diagnostic agreement in psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry 1993; 162: 621-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regier, DA, Kaelber, CT, Roper, MT, Rae, DS, Sartorius, N. The ICD-10 clinical field trial for mental and behavioural disorders: results in Canada in the Unidad States. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151: 1340-50.Google Scholar
Sartorius, N, Kaelber, CT, Cooper, JE et al. Progress towards achieving a common language in psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993; 50: 115-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Cohen, J, Fleiss, JL, Endicott, J. Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis: a new approach. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1967; 17: 83-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Y, Yang, W, Phillips, MR, Dai, C, Zheng, H. Reliability and validity of a Chinese computerized diagnostic instrument. Acta Psyciatry Scand 1987; 77: 32-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wig, N.Cross-cultural and national issues in psychiatric classification. In: Mezzich, JE, Honda, Y, Kastrup, MC, eds. Psychiatric Diagnosis. A World Perspective. New York: Springer, 1994: 3-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification o f M ental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva WHO, 1992.Google Scholar