Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:22:29.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can there be a Nietzschean sociology?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2009

W. G. Runciman
W. G. Runciman
Affiliation:
Trinity College, (Cambridge).
Get access

Abstract

The article explores the implications of Nietzsche's view of human history and psychology for a sociology formulated in Nietzschean terms, and argues that although the ‘will to power’ cannot explain all that Nietzsche claims for it, his sociology of sociology does pass his own test of validity. It is suggested in conclusion that on the relation of sociology to the rank ordering of values, Nietzsche is consistent where Weber is not, and vice versa.

Les vues de Nietzsche sur l'histoire humaine et la psychologie sont-elles susceptibles de portée pour la sociologie? Telle est la question. L'auteur argue que, même si la votonté de pouvoir ne peut rendre compte de tout ce que Nietzsche en attend, pour autant sa sociologie de la sociologie supporte bien l'épreuve de validité. La hiérarchie des valeurs de Nietzsche est consistante avec sa sociologie alors que celle de Weber ne l'est pas.

Die Untersuchung geht der Frage nach, ob die Ansichten Nietzsches zur Gesellschaftsgeschichto und zur Psychologie für die Soziologie von Bedeutung sind. Es wird die Behauptung aufgestellt, dass, obwohl der Machtwille nicht alles erklären kann, was Nietzsche sich von ihm erwartert, sich seine Soziologie der Soziologie als wahrhaftig erweist. Die Werteskala Nietzsches stimmt mit seiner Definition der Soziologie überein, was bei Weber nicht der Fall ist.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , May 2000 , pp. 3 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Archives Européenes de Sociology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) The following abbreviations are used in the text:

AC = The Antichrist (Der Antichrist); BGE = Beyond Good and Evil (Jenseits von Gut und Böse); DB = Daybreak (Morgenröte); EH = Ecce Homo; GM = The Genealogy of Morals (Zur Genealogie der Moral); GS = The Gay Science (Die fröhliche Wissenschaft); HATH = Human, All Too Human (Menschliches, Allzumenschliches); TI = Twilight of the Idols (Gotzen-Dämmerung); WP = The Will to Power (Der Wille zur Macht).

(2) MacIntyre, Alasdair, Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry (London: Duckworth, 1990), Chapter 2: ‘Genealogies and Subversions’Google Scholar.

(3) Quoted by Richardson, John, Nietzsche's System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 265 n. 109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(4) Dennett, Daniel C., Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (London: Allen Lane, 1995), p. 466Google Scholar.

(5) Runciman, W. G., A Treatise on Social Theory, Vol. II (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1989), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(6) Fleischmann, Eugène, De Weber à Nietzsche, Archives européennes de sociologie V (1964), 190–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(7) Hennis, Wilhelm, Max Weber. Essays in Reconstruction (tr. Tribe, , London: Allen and Unwin, 1988)Google Scholar, Chapter 4: ‘The Traces of Nietzsche in the Work of Max Weber’ (first published in 1986 in the Fahrbuch der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen).

(8) Eden, Robert, Political Leadership and Nihilism: a Study of Weber and Nietzsche (Tampa: University of Southern Florida Press, 1983), p. 42Google Scholar.

(9) Honicsheim, Paul, On Max Weber (tr. Rytina, . East Lansing: University of Michigan Press, 1968), p. 45Google Scholar.

(10) Habermas, Jürgen, Zur Rekonstruktion des historischen Materialismus (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1976), p. 345Google Scholar.

(11) Runciman, W. G., A Treatise on Social Theory, Vol. I (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983), p. 109Google Scholar.

(12) Mazur, A., Booth, A., and Dabbs, J. M., Testosterone and chess competition, Social Psychology Quarterly, LV (1992), 70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(13) See Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean, Intellectual Impostures (London: Profile Books, 1998), 70–72Google Scholar.

(14) Wittengenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell, 1958), p. 203Google Scholar.

(15) Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science (London: Routledge, 1958), p. 116Google Scholar.

(16) See Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John, Cognitive Adaptations for Social Exchange, in Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., And Tooby, J., eds, The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

(17) See Ostrom, Elinor, Governing the Commons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(18) See Skyrms, Brian, Evolution of the Social Contract (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

(19) Mansbridge, Jane J., ed., Beyond Self-Interest (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

(20) Young, G. M., Victorian England: Portrait of an Age (2nd. Edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953), p. 185Google Scholar.

(21) Kaufmann, Walter, Nietzsche (4th edn.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1974), p. 396Google Scholar.

(22) See Runciman, W. G., A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of Social Science (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1972), p. 33Google Scholar, cited by Mommsen, Wolfgang J., Towards the Iron Cage of Future Serfdom? on the Methodological Status of Max Weber's Concept of Bureaucratization, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, XXX (1980), p. 164 n. 14Google Scholar.

* This paper was initially given at a seminar in Cambridge in May 1999. I am grateful to the members of the seminar for their contributions to the discussion, to Bernard Williams for his comments on an earlier version and to Steven Lukes for the amendments which he suggested to the version submitted for publication.

(23) Weber, Max, Wissenschaft als Beruf, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (2nd edn.Tübingen: Mohr, 1951), p. 596Google Scholar.