Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:01:18.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Durkheim Within American Cultural Sociology and Beyond - Philip Smith, Durkheim and After: The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893-2020 (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2020, 242 p.)

Review products

Philip Smith, Durkheim and After: The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893-2020 (Cambridge, Polity Press, 2020, 242 p.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2023

Romulo Lelis
Romulo Lelis*
Affiliation:
Brazilian Center of Analysis and Planning Sao Paulo [romulo.lelis@gmail.com].
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , December 2022 , pp. 578 - 588
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Journal of Sociology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf. Philip Smith and Jeffrey C. Alexander, 1996. “Review essay: Durkheim’s religious revival”, American Journal of Sociology, 102 (2): 585-592; Philip Smith and Jeffrey C. Alexander, 2005. “Introduction: the new Durkheim” in Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 1-37); Philip Smith, 2007. “Ritual” in G. Ritzer, ed., The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Malden, Blackwell: 3944-3946); Philip Smith, 2014. “The cost of collaboration: Reflections upon Randall Collins’ theory of collective intellectual production via Émile Durkheim: A Biography”, Anthropological Quarterly, 87 (1): 245-254.

2 Paul Carls, 2021. “The unrecognized genius of Durkheim”, Journal of Classical Sociology, 22 (1): 123-130; Matt Dawson, 2022. “Book review: Durkheim and After: The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893-2020”, Thesis Eleven, 169 (1): 117-121; Christopher Thorpe, 2022. “Book review: Durkheim and After: The Durkheimian Tradition, 1893-2020”, European Journal of Social Theory, 25 (3): 496-500.

3 Cf. Jeffrey C. Alexander, 1982. Theoretical Logic in Sociology, Vol. II The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim (Berkeley, University of California Press); Jeffrey C. Alexander, 2005. “The inner development of Durkheim’s sociological theory: From early writings to maturity,” in Jeffrey C. Alexander and Philip Smith, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 136-159).

4 Page 17, in William Watts Miller, 2013. “Total aesthetics: Art and The Elemental Forms,” in Alexander Riley, W.S.F. Pickering and William Watts Miller, eds., Durkheim, the Durkheimians, and the Arts (Oxford, Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books: 16-42).

5 Cf. Émile Durkheim, 2020. “Un manuscrit inédit de Durkheim: Physique générale du droit et des mœurs, IVe Année du Cours. 1re Leçon, 2 Décembre 1899, Plan du Cours—Les Sanctions pénales,” Durkheimian Studies, 24: 33-44 [https://doi.org/10.3167/ds.2020.240103].

6 Pages 618 and 620, in Steven Lukes, 1977. “Appendix A: Courses of lectures given by Durkheim at Bourdeaux and Paris,” in Steven Lukes, Émile Durkheim, His Life and Work (Harmondsworth, Penguin: 617-620).

7 Page 162, in David A. Palmer, 2019. “Cosmology, gender, structure, and rhythm: Marcel Granet and Chinese religion in the history of social theory”, Review of Religion and Chinese Society, 6 (2): 160-187.

8 Page 196, in Michèle H. Richman, 2002. Sacred Revolutions: Durkheim and the Collège de Sociologie (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press).

9 Page 197, Ibid.