Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T21:34:19.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Administrative Ordering of Nature and Society – Precaution and Food Safety at the Molecular and Global Levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jaap C. Hanekamp ,
Jan Kwakman ,
Roel Pieterman  and
Paolo F. Ricci
Jaap C. Hanekamp
Affiliation:
Roosevelt Academy, Middelburg, the Netherlands, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Environmental Health Sciences
Jan Kwakman
Affiliation:
Seafood Importers & Processors Alliance
Roel Pieterman
Affiliation:
Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Paolo F. Ricci
Affiliation:
CEERA, Holy Names University, Oakland, CA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Responding to public fears and the loss of confidence in the aftermath of several food safety crises in the 1990s and 2000s, more and more regulatory laws have increasingly been affected by the precautionary principle. To clarify how those developments can have adverse consequences, we discuss two very different cases. First, at the molecular level we discuss the problems the system encounters by strictly applying the linear no-threshold (LNT) at low doses model, which was adopted in response to fears about the effects of ionizing radiations. Second, at a global scale, we discuss the problems associated with the precautionary regulation on Illegal, Unreported and Unregistered Fisheries that came into effect January 1, 2010. The technical aspects of food safety testing and their impacts are perhaps unknown to policy makers but they do dominate safety decisions. Both examples show that strict application of the precautionary principle produce deleterious side effects, which go against the very policy values that the precautionary regulation should protect. We show, in particular, that overly precautionary food safety regulation may harm food security. We conclude in the EU and other Western nations, problems of food security are much more relevant to human health and life expectancy than food safety. We recommend that current food safety regulation based on the precautionary risk-regulation reflex should normatively be re-evaluated with a complete regard for the values of food security – both within and outside the EU.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 313 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gray, George, Rogers, Michael D. and Wiener, Jonathan B., “Beef, Hormones, and Mad Cows”, in Wiener, Jonathan B., Rogers, Michael D., Hammit, James K. and Sand, Peter H. (eds), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe, (Washington D.C., London: RFF Press, 2011), pp. 65 et sqq Google Scholar.

2 Wiener, Jonathan B., “The Real Pattern of Precaution”, in Wiener, , Rogers, , Hammit, and Sand, (eds), The Reality of Precaution, supra note 1, pp.519 et sqq Google Scholar.

3 Vos, Ellen I.L., Overcoming the Crisis of Confidence: Risk Regulation in an Enlarged European Union (Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, 2004)Google Scholar.

4 Gray, Rogers and Wiener, “Beef, Hormones, and Mad Cows”, supra note 1.

5 Mark Cantley and Maurice Lex, “Genetically Modified Foods and Crops”, in Wiener, Rogers, Hammit and Sand (eds.), The Reality of Precaution, supra note 1, pp.39 et sqq., at p. 54.

6 The EU later named animal welfare as a ground for keeping the ban (Gray, Rogers and Wiener, “Beef, Hormones, and Mad Cows”, supra note 1, at p. 69).

7 Cantley and Lex, “Genetically Modified Foods and Crops”, supra note 5, at p. 57.

8 Burgess, Adam, Cellular Phones, Public Fears, and a Culture of Precaution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

9 Benedictus, A., Hogeveen, H., and Berends, B.R., “The price of the precautionary principle: Cost-effectiveness of BSE intervention strategies in the Netherlands”, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 89 (2009), pp.212 et sqq CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Stefan Aerts, Stuart Spencer, Eddy Decuypere, Johan De Tavernier, “BSE: to the limits of the Precautionary Principle and beyond… to boldly cull like no one has culled before?”, available on the Internet at <http://www.kuleuven.be/cwte/viewpic.php?LAN=E&TABLE=DOCS&ID=27> (last accessed on 19 July 2012).

10 Benedictus, Hogeveen, and Berends, “The price of the precautionary principle”, supra note 9, at p. 212.

11 For another view see Trouwborst, Arie, “Prevention, Precaution, Logic and Law. The Relationship Between the Precautionary Principle and the Preventative Principle in International Law and Associated Questions”, 2 Erasmus Law Review (2009), at p. 105 Google Scholar.

12 Manson, Neil A., “Formulating the Precautionary Principle”, 24 Environmental Ethics (2002), at p. 263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Wiener, Jonathan B., “Precaution in a Multi-risk World”, in Pastenbauch, Dennis J. (ed.), Human and Ecological Risk Assessment and Practice (New York: Wiley 2002)Google Scholar.

14 Vogel, David, The Politics of Precaution: Regulating health, safety, and environmental risks in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 The White House, “Public Comments on Proposed Risk Assessment Bulletin”, available on the Internet at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/comments_rab/list_rab2006.html> (last accessed on 18 July 2012); Ricci, Paolo F., “Precautionary Principles: Definitions, Issues, and Implications for Risky Choices”, in Melnick, Edward L and Everitt, Brian S (eds), Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Assessment (New York: Wiley 2007)Google Scholar.

16 Harremoës, Poul, Gee, David, MacGarvin, Malcolm, et al., Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000 (Copenhagen: European Environment Agency 2000), at p. 170 Google Scholar.

17 Cf. among many others Sunstein, Cass R., Risk and Reason: safety, law, and the environment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002)Google Scholar and Sunstein, Cass R., Laws of fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Nathan Roscoe Pound (1870 – 1964) was a distinguished American legal scholar and educator. He developed the idea of ‘sociological jurisprudence’ and is considered one of the founders of American ‘legal realism’. In his well known Interpretations of Legal History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1923) he remarks that jurisprudence might be considered as a science of social engineering, the ordering of human relations through the action of politically organized society.

19 Health Council of the Netherlands, Prudent Precaution, (Den Haag 2008)Google ScholarPubMed.

20 Cross, Frank B., “Paradoxical Perils of the Precautionary Principle”, 53 Washington and Lee Law Review (1996)Google Scholar.

21 Furedi, Frank, “Precautionary Culture and the Rise of Possibilistic Risk Assessment”, 2 Erasmus Law Review (2009) at p. 197 Google Scholar.

22 Whiteside, Kerry H., Precautionary politics: principle and practice in confronting environmental risk. (Cambridge: MIT Press 2006), at p. 153 Google Scholar.

23 Vogel, The Politics of Precaution, supra note 14.

24 Paolo F. Ricci, S R. Straja and J. Cox., “Changing the Risk Paradigms Can Be Good for Your Health”, Int. J. Dose Response (in Press, 2012).

25 ‘Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety’ (2002) O J Eur Comm L31, 1.

26 See the Annex IV of the now defunct Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2377/90 of 26 June 1990 laying down a Community procedure to set up maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin, 1990 O J Eur Comm L224/1.

27 Hanekamp, Jaap C., Frapporti, Giuseppe, and Olieman, Kees, “Chloramphenicol, food safety and precautionary thinking in Europe”, 6 Environmental Liability (2003), at p. 209 Google Scholar.

28 ‘Regulation (EC) No 470/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 laying down Community procedures for the establishment of residue limits of pharmacologically active substances in foodstuffs of animal origin, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 and amending Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council’ (2009) L152 O J Eur Comm 11.

29 See e.g.: ‘Commission decision of 11 January 2005 laying down harmonised standards for the testing for certain residues in products of animal origin imported from third countries’ L16 O J Eur Union (2005) 61.

30 See e.g.: Kathren, Ronald L., “Historical Development of the Linear Nonthreshold Dose-Response Model as Applied to Radiation”, 1 Pierce Law Review (2003), at p. 3 Google Scholar.

31 Gezondheidsraad. Leidraad classificatie carcinogene stoffen. (Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad, 2010, publikatienr. A10/07).

32 Bruce, R D., Carlton, W W., Ferber, K H. et al., “Re-examination of the ED01 study. Why the society of toxicology became involved”, 1 Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (1981), at p. 26 Google Scholar.

33 Ibid.

34 Moustacchi, Ethel, “DNA damage and repair: consequences on dose-responses”, 464 Mutation Research (2000), at p. 35 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Calabrese, Edward J. and Baldwin, Linda A., “Toxicology Rethinks its Central Belief. Hormesis Demands a Repraisal of the Way Risks are Assessed”, 421 Nature (2003), at p. 691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Maurice Tubiana, and Andre Aurengo, “Dose–effect relationship and estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionising radiation: the Joint Report of the Académie des Sciences (Paris) and of the Académie Nationale de Médecine”, 2 (3/4) International Journal of Low Radiation (2005), at p. 1.

35 Kaiser, Jocelyn, “Sipping from a Poisoned Chalice”, 320 Science (2003), at 376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Calabrese, Edward J., “Hormesis and medicine”, 66(5) British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (2008), at p. 594 Google Scholar.

36 Pagnotti, Vincent S., Chubatyi, Nicholas D., and McEwen, Charles N., “Solvent Assisted Inlet Ionization: An Ultrasensitive New Liquid Introduction Ionization Method for Mass Spectrometry”, 83 Analytical Chemistry (2011), at p.3981 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

37 See further: Hanekamp, Jaap C. and Calabrese, Edward, “Chloramphenicol, European Legislation and Hormesis”, 5 Dose-Response (2007), at p. 91 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. Berendsen, Bjorn, Stolker, Linda, de Jong, Jacob, et al., “Evidence of natural occurrence of the banned antibiotic chloramphenicol in herbs and grass”, 397 Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2010), at p. 1955 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See further: Hanekamp, Jaap, Kwakman, Jan, Olieman, Kees, “Crossing the ecological threshold – of scientific analysis, natural chemicals and global trade”, 399 Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2011), at p.2223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Cooper, Kevin, Samsonova, Jeanne, Plumpton, Laura, et al., “Enzyme immunoassay for semicarbazide–The nitrofuran metabolite and food contaminant”, 592 Analytica Chimica Acta (2007), at p. 64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

39 European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General (DG SANCO), “Note to all chief veterinary officers”, Subject: Semicarbazide in various foods (2003).

40 Pereira, Alberto dos Santos, Donato, Jose, and De Nucci, Gilberto, “Implications of the use of semicarbazide as a metabolic target of nitrofurazone contamination in coated products”, 21 Food Additives and Contaminants (2004), at p. 63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Hoenicke, Katrin, Gatermann, Robert, Hartig, Lutz, et al., “Formation of semicarbazide (SEM) in food by hypochlorite treatment – is SEM a specific marker for nitrofurazone abuse?”, 21 Food Additives and Contaminants (2004), at p. 526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Saari, Leena and Peltonen, Kimmo, “Novel source of semicarbazide: levels of semicarbazide in cooked crayfish samples determined by LC/MS/MS”, 21 Food Additives and Contaminants (2004), at p. 825 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

42 Van Poucke, Christof, Detaverniert, Christ’l, Wille, Mathieu, et al., “Investigation into the Possible Natural Occurence of Semicarbazide in Macrobrachium rosenbergii Prawns”, 59 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (2011), at p.2107 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

43 See further: Hubert F. De Brabander, Julie Vanden Bussche, Klaas Wille, et al., “The state of the art of residue analysis: the 6th VDRA symposium 2010”, 2 Drug Testing and Analysis (2010), at p. 421. Julie Vanden Bussche, “Analytical Approaches To Unravel The Semi-Endogenous Status Of Thiouracil”, (PhD thesis on file at the University of Gent, 2011).

44 Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (New York: United Nations, 1989). Available on the Internet at <http://www.un-documents.net/wcedocf.htm> (last accessed on the 18 July 2012). Named after the chair of the commission this report is also known as the ‘Brundlandt report’.

45 Peel, Jacqueline, The Precautionary Principle in Practice: Environmental Decision-Making and Scientific Uncertainty (Annandale: The Federation Press 2005)Google Scholar.

46 Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. (Brussels, 2000)Google ScholarPubMed.

47 Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission on an Integrated Framework for Fisheries Partnership Agreements with Third Countries (Brussels, 2002); available on the Internet at <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0637:FIN:EN:PDF> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

48 Available on the Internet at <http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf< (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

49 Commission of the European Communities. Communication from the Commission. Community action plan for the eradication of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. COM (2002) 180 final (Brussels 2002).

50 COM (2007) 602 final 2007/0223 (CNS), “Proposal for a Council Regulation Establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing”.

51 COM (2007) 601 final (Brussels, 17.10.2007), “Communication from the Commission. On a new strategy for the Community to prevent, deter and eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing”, available on the Internet at <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Lex-UriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0601:FIN:EN:PDF> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

52 Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1936/2001 and (EC) No 601/2004 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 1093/94 and (EC) No 1447/1999 (2008) L286 O J Eur Union 1.

53 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 of 22 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (2009) L280 O J Eur Union 5.

54 ‘Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006’ (2009) L343 O J Eur Union 1.

55 On the IUU information website of the European Commission, a list of flag states was made available, which had a working certification system and in the first week of December 2009 there wasn’t a single EU member state listed, indicating the lack of understanding of the IUU implementation even at the level of the European Union. On the 31st of December 2009 the list of Member States was complete, yet Belgium and Italy were still absent. Available on the Internet at <http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/illegal_fishing/index_en.htm> (last accessed on 18 July 2012). List of Member States and their competent authorities concerning Articles 15(2), 17(8) and 21(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 (2009) C320 O J Eur Union 17.

56 Seafish. ‘IUU – New developments 29 September 2009 to 4 February 2010. Current position and timeline.’

57 EC Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, “Change of the date for the import of fishery products from Russia” Mare-A-4/BK D(2010)339473, Ref. Ares(2010)309934 – 07/06/2010.

58 “Analysis of Expected Consequences for Developing Countries of the IUU Fishing Proposed Regulation and Identification of Measures Needed to Implement the Regulation – Phase 2 Final Report”, (France, Portugal: Oceanic Développement Megapesca Lda 2009).

59 See Lomborg, Bjørn, Solutions for the world's biggest problems: cost and benefits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Federico, Giovanni, Feeding the world: an economic history of agriculture, 1800 – 2000, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar. See further: United Nations Development Program, The Millennium Development Goals Report 2011. (New York: United Nations, 7 July 2011, at p. 4.); available on the Internet at <http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/11_MDG%20Report_EN.pdf> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

61 See <http://www.undp.org.za/mdgs-news/375-corruption-hampers-progress-on-millennium-development-goals-report-> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

62 See <http://www.unodc.org/yournocounts> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

63 Thornton, Joe, The Product is the Poison: The Case for a Chlorine Phase-Out (Washington, DC: Greenpeace Publication 1991)Google Scholar. See further: Cap, Andrew P., “The Chlorine Controversy”, 68 International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health (1996), at p. 455 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

64 Öberg, Gunilla, “The natural chlorine cycle – fitting the scattered pieces”, 58 Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2002), at p. 565 Google ScholarPubMed. Gribble, Gordon W., Naturally Occurring Organohalogen Compounds – A Comprehensive Update. (Vienna: Springer-Verlag 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Cross, Frank B., “Legal Implications of Hormesis”, 20(3) Humans & Experimental Toxicology (2001), at p. 156 Google ScholarPubMed.

66 Wiener, Jonathan B., “Hormesis and the Radical Moderation of Law”, 20(3) Human & Experimental Toxicology, (2001), at p. 162 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

67 Renn, Ortwin, “An Ethical Appraisal of Hormesis: Towards a Rational Discourse on the Acceptability of Risks and Benefits”, 3(1) American Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology (2008), at p.165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Hanekamp, Jaap C. and Bast, Aalt, “Food Supplements and European Regulation within a Precautionary Context: a Critique and Implications for Nutritional, Toxicological and Regulatory Consistency”, 47 Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (2007), at p. 267 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed. See further: Ames, Bruce N., Wakimoto, Patricia, “Are Vitamin and Mineral Deficiencies a Major Cancer Risk?”, 2 Nature (2002), at p. 694 Google ScholarPubMed. Ames, Bruce N., “Increasing longevity by tuning up metabolism”, 6 EMBO reports (2005), S20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

69 See <http://www.fightmalnutrition.eu> (last accessed on 18 July 2012). Of course, the problem is recognized in other EU countries as well, for instance in the UK guidelines for screening and treating malnutrition exist, see <http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&o=29985> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

70 See <http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/what/food-security/index_en.htm> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

71 Philip James, Fritz Kemper and Gerard Pascal, “A European Food and Public Health Authority. The future of scientific advice in the EU”, December 1999, available on the Internet at <http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/future_food_en.pdf> (last accessed on 18 July 2012), p. 42.

72 Munro, Ian C., Ford, Richard A., Kennepohl, Elke et al., “Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern”, 34 Food and Chemical Toxicology (1996), at p. 829 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

73 See <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/120702.htm?WT.mc_id=EFSAHL01&emt=1> (last accessed on 18 July 2012).

74 Hanekamp, Frapporti and Olieman, “Chloramphenicol, food safety and precautionary thinking in Europe”, supra note 27.