Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:07:46.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil for elective neurosurgical procedures: an audit of early postoperative complications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2006

A. Y. C. Wong ,
A. M. O'Regan  and
M. G. Irwin
A. Y. C. Wong
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hong Kong
A. M. O'Regan
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hong Kong
M. G. Irwin
Affiliation:
University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hong Kong
Get access

Extract

Summary

Background and objectives: This was a prospective audit to assess the incidence and characteristics of early postoperative complications in the recovery room in extubated patients after elective neurosurgical procedures using propofol and remifentanil-based total intravenous anaesthesia. Methods: Vital signs (temperature, conscious level, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, pulse and blood pressure) and postoperative complications (shivering, nausea, vomiting and cardiorespiratory) were analysed in 145 adult patients over a 1-yr period. Results: The overall shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting and postoperative hypertension (systolic blood pressure more than 25% of the preoperative value) incidences were 30.3%, 16.6% and 35.2%, respectively. Fifty-one percent of the patients had at least one of the above complications. The complication rates were found to be widely different among various types of neurosurgery. The surgical procedures were divided into five groups: supratentorial craniotomy, posterior fossa craniotomy, intracranial vascular procedures, transphenoidal hypophysectomy and extracranial procedures. Median extubation time was similar in all groups and patients were fully conscious with no hypoxia in the recovery room. The intracranial vascular group had the highest shivering and postoperative nausea and vomiting rates (58.8% and 29.4%, respectively). In the supratentorial craniotomy group, 46% of the patients had hypertension. The overall complication rate (presence of any complications) was highest in the supratentfial craniotomy (55.4%), posterior fossa craniotomy (75%) and intracranial vascular (76.5%) groups. Shivering and overall complication rate was significantly related to the anaesthetic time (P ≤ 0.001 and 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Despite the potential advantages of total intravenous anaesthesia in titratability, rapid return of consciousness and reduced respiratory complications, making it suitable for planned extubation at the end of neurosurgery, the postoperative complications of shivering, postoperative nausea and vomiting and hypertension were still high.

Keywords

ANAESTHESIA INTRAVENOUSINTRAVENOUS ANAESTHETICS, propofolANALGESICS OPIOID, remifentanilNEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES, craniotomy, supratentorial, posterior fossa, extracranial, intracranial vascular, transphenoidal hypophysectomyCOMPLICATIONS POSTOPERATIVE, shivering, nausea, vomiting, hypertension
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , July 2006 , pp. 586 - 590
Copyright
© 2006 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kluger MT, Bullock MFM. Recovery room incidents: a review of 419 reports from the anaesthetic incident monitoring study (AIMS). Anaesth Intens Care 2002; 57: 1060–1066.Google Scholar
Zelcer J, Wells DG. Anaesthetic-related recovery room complications. Anaesth Intens Care 1987; 15: 168–174.Google Scholar
Hines R, Barash PG, Watrous G, O'Connor T. Complications occurring in the postanaesthesia care unit: a survey. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 503–509.Google Scholar
Rose DK. Recovery room problems or problems in the PACU. Can J Anesth 1996; 43: 116–122.Google Scholar
Manninen PH, Raman SK, Boyle K, El-Beheiry H. Early postoperative complications following neurosurgical procedures. Can J Anesth 1999; 46: 7–14.Google Scholar
Petersen KD, Landsfeldt U, Cold GE et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamic in patients with cerebral tumours: a randomised prospective study of patients subjected to craniotomy in propofol-fentanyl, isoflurane-fentanyl, or sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 329–336.Google Scholar
Todd MM, Warner DS, Sokoll MD et al. A prospective, comparative trial of three anesthetics for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Propofol/fentanyl, isoflurane/nitrous oxide, and fentanyl/nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 1005–1020.Google Scholar
Kahveci FS, Kahveci N, Alkan T, Goren B, Korfali E, Ozluk K. Propofol versus isoflurane anesthesia under hypothermic conditions: effects on intracranial pressure and local cerebral blood flow after diffuse traumatic brain injury in the rat. Surg Neurol 2001; 56: 206–214.Google Scholar
Cenic A, Craen RA, Lee TY, Gelb AW. Cerebral blood volume and blood flow responses to hyperventilation in brain tumors during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 661–666.Google Scholar
Gan TJ, Meyer T, Apfel C, Chung F et al. Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2003; 97 (1): 62–71.Google Scholar
Fabling JM, Gan TJ, El-Moalem HE, Warner DS, Borel CO. A randomised, double-blind comparison of ondansetron versus placebo for prevention of nausea and vomiting after infratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesth 2002; 14: 102–107.Google Scholar
Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R et al. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2004; 98 (3): 632–641.Google Scholar
Hofer CK, Zollinger A, Buchi R et al. Patient well-being after general anaesthesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled multi-centre trial comparing intravenous and inhalation anaesthesia. Brit J Anaesth 2003; 91 (5): 631–637.Google Scholar
Raftery S, Sherry E. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil protects against postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 37–40.Google Scholar
Chittleborough MC, Osborne FA, Rudkin GE et al. Double-blind comparison of patient recovery after induction with propofol or thiopentone for day-case relaxant general anesthesia. Anaesth Intens Care 1992; 20: 169–173.Google Scholar
Cheng C, Matsukawa T, Sessler DI et al. Increasing mean skin temperature linearly reduces the core-temperature thresholds for vasoconstriction and shivering in humans. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1160–1168.Google Scholar
Pauca AL, Savage RT, Simpson S, Roy RC. Effect of pethidine, fentanyl and morphine on postoperative shivering in man. Acta Anaesth Scand 1984; 28: 138–143.Google Scholar
Alfonsi P, Sessler D, Du Manoir et al. The effects of meperidine and sufentanil on shivering threshold in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 43–48.Google Scholar
Olsen KS, Pedersen CB, Madsen JB, Ravn LI, Schifter S. Vasoactive modulators during and after craniotomy: relation to postoperative hypertension. J Neurosurg Anesth 2002; 14: 171–179.Google Scholar
Gibson BE, Black S, Maass L, Cucchiara RF. Esmolol for the control of hypertension after neurologic surgery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1988; 44: 650–653.Google Scholar
Basali A, Mascha EJ, Kalfas I, Schubert A. Relation between perioperative hypertension and intracranial hemorrhage after craniotomy. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 48–53.Google Scholar
Bruder N, Pellissier D, Grillot P, Gouin F. Cerebral hyperemia during recovery from general anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 650–654.Google Scholar