Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T17:26:41.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Propofol attenuates ischaemia-reperfusion injury in the rat heart in vivo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

I. Kobayashi*
Affiliation:
Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
N. Kokita
Affiliation:
Asahikawa Medical College, Department of Anesthesiology, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
A. Namiki
Affiliation:
Sapporo Medical University, School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Hokkaido, Japan
*
Correspondence to: Iwao Kobayashi, Department of Anesthesiology, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Akebono 1-1, Asahikawa 070-8530, Japan. E-mail: iwakoba0116@asahikawa-rch.gr.jp; Tel: +81 166 22 8111; Fax: +81 166 22 5108
Get access

Summary

Background

We have previously demonstrated, in the isolated rat heart, that propofol attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced damage and ischaemia-reperfusion injury, and that the beneficial effect of propofol is correlated with reduction of the lipid peroxidation. This study was designed to evaluate whether propofol has a cardioprotective effect against ischaemia-reperfusion injury in a rat model in vivo.

Methods

Adult rats were anaesthetized with pentobarbital 10 mg kg−1 h−1 alone (control group), pentobarbital 10 or 20 mg kg−1 h−1 + Intralipid® as a vehicle (Pent-10, Pent-20 group), propofol 10 or 20 mg kg−1 h−1 (Prop-10, Prop-20 group) intravenously throughout the experiment. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 30 min followed by 120 min of reperfusion. Infarct size was determined at the end of reperfusion. The tissue concentration of malondialdehyde was measured at 30 min after reperfusion to evaluate lipid peroxidation.

Results

The infarct sizes (% of area at risk) were significantly smaller in the Prop-10 (54 ± 11%; P < 0.01 vs. control) and Prop-20 (39 ± 8%; P < 0.01 vs. control) groups than in the control (68 ± 9%), Pent-10 (69 ± 13%) and Pent-20 (68 ± 14%) groups (n = 12). In the Pent-10 and Pent-20 groups, ischaemia-reperfusion produced significant increases in the values for tissue malondialdehyde (0.72 ± 0.24 μmol mg protein−1; P < 0.05 and 0.63 ± 0.33 μmol mg protein−1; P < 0.05 vs. 0.46 ± 0.22 μmol mg protein−1 in non-ischaemic hearts, n = 8). However, the values of malondialdehyde in the Prop-10 and -20 groups were suppressed by 41% and 63%, respectively, compared with the Pent-10 group (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that propofol could be cardioprotective against ischaemia-reperfusion injury dose dependently in a rat model in vivo and that the beneficial action of propofol may be correlated with its antioxidant effect.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Orlando, FL, USA, October 2002.

References

1.Murphy, PG, Myers, DS, Davies, MJ, Webster, NR, Jones, JG. The antioxidant potential of propofol (2,6-diisopropylphenol). Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 613618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Kokita, N, Hara, A. Propofol attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced mechanical and metabolic derangements in the isolated rat heart. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 117127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Kokita, N, Hara, A, Abiko, Y, Arakawa, J, Hashizume, H, Namiki, A. Propofol improves functional and metabolic recovery in ischemic reperfused isolated rat hearts. Anesth Analg 1998; 86: 252258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ko, SH, Yu, CW, Lee, SK et al. . Propofol attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 719724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Yamaguchi, S, Hamaguchi, S, Mishio, M, Okuda, Y, Kitajima, T. Propofol prevents lipid peroxidation following transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Can J Anaesth 2000; 47: 10251030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Kahraman, S, Kilinc, K, Dal, D, Erdem, K. Propofol attenuates formation of lipid peroxides in tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78: 279281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Ansley, DM, Sun, J, Visser, WA et al. . High dose propofol enhances red cell antioxidant capacity during CPB in humans. Can J Anaesth 1999; 46: 641648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Gerhard, GS, Kaufmann, EJ, Wang, X et al. . Genetic differences in hepatic lipid peroxidation potential and iron levels in mice. Mech Ageing Dev 2002; 123: 167176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Lowry, OH, Rosebrough, NJ, Farr, AL, Randall, RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Yang, CH, Shyr, MH, Kuo, TBJ, Tan, PPC, Chan, SHH. Effects of propofol on nociceptive response and power spectra of electroencephalographic and systemic arterial pressure signals in the rat: Correlation with plasma concentration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995; 275: 15681574.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Cope, DK, Impastato, WK, Cohen, MV, Downey, JM. Volatile anesthetics protect the ischemic rabbit myocardium from infarction. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 699709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Cohen, MV, Yang, XM, Downey, JM. Conscious rabbits become tolerant to multiple episodes of ischemic preconditioning. Circ Res 1994; 74: 9981004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Yang, CCH, Kuo, TBJ, Chan, SHH. Auto- and cross-spectral analysis of cardiovascular fluctuations during pentobarbital anesthesia in the rat. Am J Physiol 1996; 270: H575582.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Zacharowski, K, Olbrich, A, Otto, M, Hafner, G, Thiemerman, C. Effects of the prostanoid EP3-receptor against M&B 28767 and GR 63799X on infarct size caused by regional myocardial ischaemia in the anaesthetized rat. Br J Pharmacol 1999; 126: 849858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Schwarz, ER, Somoano, Y, Hale, SL, Kloner, RA. What is the required reperfusion period for assessment of myocardial infarct size using triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining in the rats? J Thromb Thrombolysis 2000; 10: 181187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Grimm, H, Mayer, K, Mayser, P, Eingenbrodt, E. Regulatory potential of n-3 fatty acids in immunological and inflammatory processes. Br J Nutr 2002; 87 (Suppl 1): S5967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Janero, DR. Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic Biol Med 1990; 9: 515540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Koster, JF, Slee, RG, Essed, CE, Stam, H. Studies on cumene hydroperoxide-induced lipid peroxidation in the isolated perfused rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1985; 17: 701708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Hara, A, Matsumura, H, Abiko, Y. Lidocaine attenuates both mechanical and metabolic changes induced by hydrogen peroxide in the rat heart. Am J Physiol 1993; 265: H1478H1485.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Downey, JM, Yellon, H, Yellon, DM. The role of xanthine oxidase during myocardial ischemia in several species including man. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1988; 20 (Suppl II): 5563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Mathur, S, Farhangkhgoee, P, Karmazyn, M. Cardioprotective effects of propofol and sevoflurane in ischemic and reperfused rat hearts. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 13491360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Ismaeil, MS, Tkachenko, I, Gamperl, AK, Hickey, RF, Cason, BA. Mechanisms of isoflurane-induced myocardial preconditioning in rabbits. Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 812821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Wickley, PJ, Ding, X, Murray, PA, Damron, DS. Propofol-induced activation of protein kinase C isoforms in adult rat ventricular myocytes. Anesthesiology 2006; 104: 970977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Navalija, E, Kevin, LG, Camara, AK, Bosnjak, ZJ, Kampine, JP, Stowe, DF. Reactive oxygen species precede the epsilon isoform of protein C in the anesthetic preconditioning signaling cascade. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 421428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar