Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:56:35.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oral piercing: risk of aspiration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2005

U. Schwemmer ,
M. Lintner  and
C. A. Greim
U. Schwemmer
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
M. Lintner
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
C. A. Greim
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Fulda, Fulda, Germany
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 22 , Issue 9 , September 2005 , pp. 727 - 729
Copyright
© 2005 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wright J. Modifying the body: piercings and tattoos. Nurs Stand 1995; 10: 27–30.Google Scholar
Kuczkowski KM, Benumof JL. Tongue piercing and obstetric anesthesia: is there a cause of concern? J Clin Anesth 2002; 14: 447–448.Google Scholar
Wise H. Hypoxia caused by body piercing. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1129.Google Scholar
Mandabach MG, McCann DE, Thompson GE. Body art: another concern for the anesthesiologist [Letter]. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 279–280.Google Scholar
Oyos TL. Intubation sequence for patient presenting with tongue ring [Letter]. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 279.Google Scholar
Radford R. Further hazards of body piercing [Letter]. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 305.Google Scholar
Symons I. Body piercing [Letter]. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 305.Google Scholar