Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:58:12.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of pre-emptive analgesia on self-reported and biological measures of pain after tonsillectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

S. Podder
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
J. Wig
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
S. K. Malhotra
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
S. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012, India
Get access

Abstract

This prospective, double-blind, randomized study assessed effect of pre-emptive peritonsillar block in 30 ASA–I children, aged 6–12 years, of both sexes, scheduled for tonsillectomy. Patients were divided into three groups: those in group I received a sham block, whereas peritonsillar blocks with bupivacaine 0.25% were given to the children before tonsillectomy (group II) or immediately after surgery had been completed (group III). Constant pain, pain on swallowing, blood glucose, serum epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were measured immediately after surgery and 4 h after operation. Patients in group I experienced more pain (P < 0.05) than those in groups II and III, both in the immediate postoperative period and over the next 4 h. Patients in groups II and III experienced similar pain (P > 0.05). The pain experienced when water was swallowed was similar to that of the constant pain. The rise of serum norepinephrine concentration in group II was significantly less (P < 0.05) compared to groups I and III. We found both pre-emptive and postoperative block to be equally effective in treating postoperative pain, with pre-emptive block being more effective in preventing the rise in norepinephrine concentration.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2000 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)