No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Pre-emptive analgesia produced by interscalene blockade. What failed: the block or the methods?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 July 2005
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0265021503231501/resource/name/firstPage-S0265021503001509a.jpg)
- Type
- Correspondence
- Information
- Copyright
- 2003 European Society of Anaesthesiology
References
Haltiavaara KM, Laitinen JO, Kaukinen S, Viljakka TJ, Laippala PJ, Luukkaala TH. Failure of interscalene brachial plexus blockade to produce pre-emptive analgesia after shoulder surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20: 72–73.Google Scholar
Kelly DJ, Ahmad M, Brull SJ. Preemptive analgesia II: recent advances and current trends. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 1091–1101.Google Scholar
Gentili F, Hudson AR, Hunter D, Kline DG. Nerve injection injury with local anesthetic agents: a light and electron microscopic, fluorescent microscopic, and horseradish peroxidase study. Neurosurgery 1980; 6: 263–272.Google Scholar
Benumof JL. Permanent loss of cervical spinal cord function associated with interscalene block performed under general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1541–1544.Google Scholar