Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-lfgmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-04T15:01:44.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cost-reduction analysis of propofol versus sevoflurane: maintenance of anaesthesia for gynaecological surgery using the bispectral index

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

M. M. R. F. Struys
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
A. A. L. Somers
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Ghent, Belgium
N. Van Den Eynde
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
L. L. G. Herregods
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
D. Dyzers
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
H. M. Robays
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Ghent, Belgium
E. P. Mortier
Affiliation:
Ghent University Hospital, Department of Anaesthesia Ghent, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Background and objective: The study was designed to compare the costs of propofol versus sevoflurane for the maintenance of the hypnotic component of anaesthesia during general anaesthesia, guided by the bispectral index, for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.

Methods: Forty ASA Grade I—II female patients scheduled for gynaecological laparoscopy were randomly allocated to two groups. All patients received a continuous infusion of remifentanil (0.25 µg kg−1 min−1) for 2 min. Then anaesthesia was induced with propofol 1% at 300 mL h−1 until loss of consciousness. To guide the bispectral index between 40 and 60, Group 1 patients received propofol 10 mg kg−1 h−1 initially, which was increased or decreased by 2 mg kg−1 h−1 steps; Group 2 patients received sevoflurane, initially set at 2 vol.% and adjusted with steps of 0.2–0.4%. The time and quality of anaesthesia and recovery were assessed in two postoperative standardized interviews.

Results: Patient characteristics, the propofol induction dose, the bispectral index and the haemodynamic profiles during induction of anaesthesia, and its duration, were similar between the groups. In Group 1, 7.55 ± 1.75 mg kg−1 h−1 propofol and in Group 2, 0.20 ± 0.09 mL kg−1 h−1 liquid sevoflurane were used for maintenance. The cost for maintenance, including wasted drugs, was higher when using propofol (€25.14 ± 10.69) than sevoflurane (€12.80 ± 2.67). Postoperatively, recovery profiles tended to be better with propofol; however, the day after discharge no differences were found.

Conclusions: When applying the bispectral index to guide the administration of hypnotic anaesthetic drugs, propofol-based maintenance of anaesthesia was associated with the highest cost. A trend towards a better recovery profile was obtained with propofol. However, on the day after discharge, no differences in quality were observed.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)