Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:33:47.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulating Dispute Resolution: ADR and Access to Justice at the Crossroads Bayreuth, 14-16 September 2012*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

Jana Haertling*
Affiliation:
University of Bayreuth.
Get access

Extract

The aim to develop transnational principles for the regulation of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which deal, inter alia, with whether and how the use of ADR should be promoted by the state and how ADR should be regulated, brought leading experts from different European countries, the USA and Japan to the University of Bayreuth from 14-16 September 2012. ADR refers to dispute resolution mechanisms outside the state court system. It includes procedures such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, (binding) expert opinion, arbitration and ombudsman proceedings. In suitable cases, ADR offers solutions which are faster and cheaper than court procedures, especially for cross-border conflicts. The parties have greater control over the conflict resolution procedure. They can arrive at a sustainable compromise adapted to their interests. The procedures are conducted in private; the parties can agree to keep the result confidential.

Type
Conference Report
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Organised by Hannes Unberath (Germany) and Felix Steffek (Germany), in cooperation with Hazel Genn (UK) and Reinhard Greger (Germany).