Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T03:58:33.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin American Amnesties in Comparative Perspective: Can the Past Be Buried?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

Margaret Popkin  and
Nehal Bhuta
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout Latin America during the past 15 years, new democratic or postwar governments have faced demands for transitional justice following the end of authoritarian rule or the conclusion of internal armed conflicts.

Demands for justice for serious past abuses have often been met by threats of destabilization by the perpetrators and calls for forgiving and forgetting in the name of reconciliation.

Although recent developments in and interpretations of international law oblige states to punish those responsible for serious human rights violations, many transitional governments insist that reconciliation requires broad amnesty laws. This essay first reviews basic legal and conceptual issues relating to prosecution of, and grants of amnesty to, those responsible for gross human rights abuses during earlier periods. A comparative examination follows, starting with El Salvador, where the amnesty law constitutes the most comprehensive and successful action to end efforts to address past abuses. The essay then reviews the status of efforts in Argentina, Chile, Honduras, Guatemala, and South Africa, where, despite amnesty laws, civil society and courts have sought to uncover the truth about the past, hold perpetrators accountable, and obtain redress for victims.

Type
Articles
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 13 , March 1999 , pp. 99 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Orentlicher, D., “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime,” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991), pp. 2537–615.Google Scholar; Roht-Arriaza, N., ed., Impunity and Human Rights in International Law and Practice (New York: Clarendon, 1995Google Scholar); Roht-Arriaza, N., “State Responsibility to Investigate and Prosecute Grave Human Rights Violations in International Law,” California Law Review 4 (1990), pp. 451–513Google Scholar.

2 Huyse, Luc, “Justice after Transition: On the Choices Successor Elites Make in Dealing with the Past,” in Kritz, Neil J., ed., Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, vol. 1 (Washington, D. C.: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995), pp. 337–49Google Scholar.

3 Acuña, Carlos H. and Smulovitz, Catalina, “Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts,” in McAdams, A. James, ed., Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), pp. 93–122Google Scholar.

4 See Arts. 1(1) and 25, American Convention on Human Rights, signed November 22, 1969, entry into force July 18, 1978, reprinted in Basic Documents Pertaining to Human Rights in the Inter-American System, OEA/Ser.L.V/II.92, dot. 31, rev. 3 (May 3, 1996), pp. 25–53Google Scholar.

5 Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, report no. 36/96 (Chile), 95th Sess., OEA/Ser. L/V/II/95 (Oct. 15, 1996), pp. 157–83. On the applicability of the convention to acts committed before the state became a party, see Nicaragua, Genie Lacayo V. (Inter-American Court on Human Rights, Decision on Preliminary Objections in a Case of Alleged Arbitrary Killing of a Civilian Car Driver by Members of a Military Convoy), reprinted in Human Rights Journal 16 (1995), pp. 414ffGoogle Scholar.

6 Chile report, para. 77, citing Velásquez-Rodriguez case, Judgment, July 29, 1988, Ser. C, No. 4, para. 174Google Scholar.

7 Méndez, Juan, afterword to The Flight: Confessions of an Argentine Dirty Warrior, by Horacio Verbitsky (New York: The New Press, 1996), pp. 160–79Google Scholar.

8 Letter to Margaret Popkin from Toni Pfanner, Head of Legal Division, ICRC Headquarters, Geneva, April 15, 1997Google Scholar.

9 Roht-Arriaza, N. and Gibson, L., “The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty,” Human Rights Quarterly 20 (1998), pp. 847–85, at p. 867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10 Amnesty was not granted to the five former National Guards convicted for the 1980 murders of four American churchwomen. Amnesty was also denied to former FMLN combatants convicted of killing four U.S. marines and nine civilians in the 1985 Zona Rosa attack. The successor Supreme Court's Criminal Chamber ruled that amnesty could not be denied to two former FMLN combatants accused of executing two wounded U.S. military officers after their helicopter was shot down in early 1991: Guevara Portillo Case, Sala de lo Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, San Salvador, August 16, 1995.

11 Rosenberg, Tina, “What Did You Do in the War, Mama?” New York Times Magazine, February 7, 1999, pp. 52, 93Google Scholar.

12 Ibid.Google Scholar

13 See Méndez, , afterword to The Flight, pp. 160–79Google Scholar.

14 Ibid., p. 166Google Scholar.

15 Scilingo's account was published in Verbitsky, Horatio, El Vuelo (Buenos Aires: Planeta, 1995Google Scholar), published in English as The Flight: Confessions of an Argentine Dirty Warrior (New York: The New Press, 1996Google Scholar).

16 For a discussion of these cases, see Abregú, Martín, “La tutela judicial del derecho a la verdad en la Argentina,” Revista IIDH 4(1996), pp. 11–49Google Scholar.

17 See Relea, Francesco, “La Corte Suprema argentina cierra la puerta a las investigaciones sobre los desaparecidos,” El País, August 15, 1998. http://www.elpais.es/p/d/19980815/internac/baires.htmGoogle Scholar.

18 “ El jefe del Ejército argentino reconoce los crímenes de la dictadura ,” El País , February 13, 1998 . http://www.elpais.ed/p/d/19980213/internac/argent.htmGoogle Scholar.

19 “ La justicia argentina busca a los culpables de cerca de 200 secuestros de niños en la dictadura ,” El País , June 11, 1998 . http://www.elpais.es/p/d/19980611/internac/argent.htmGoogle Scholar.

20 See Sutil, Jorge Correa, “‘No Victorious Army Has Ever Been Prosecuted …’: The Unsettled Story of Transitional Justice in Chile,” in McAdams, , ed., Transitional Justice, pp. 123–54Google Scholar.

21 “ Chile Allowed to Participate in Pinochet Hearing ,” CNN, January 13, 1999Google Scholar.

22 “El fallo con que la Corte Suprema de Chile rechazó la aplicación de la ley de amnistía de 1978 a caso de desaparición forzada fue calificado, 25 años después del golpe de Estado de 1973, de precedence histórico,” Inter-Press Service, September 13, 1998Google Scholar.

23 Human Rights Watch, “Pinochet in Chile: Guaranteed Impunity” (December 1998Google Scholar).

24 See Comisionado Nacional de Protección de los Derechos Humanos, Los Hechos Hablan por Si Mismos (Tegucigalpa, Honduras: Ed. Guaymuras, 1994Google Scholar), translated into English as Honduras: The Facts Speak for Themselves (New York: Human Rights Watch/Americas and Center for Justice and International Law, 1994Google Scholar).

25 “ El Ejército hondureño justifica la represión como ‘polítics de Esta do,’ ” El País February 25, 1998 . http://www.elpais/p/d/19980225/internac/hondu.htmGoogle Scholar.

26 For a description of this law, challenges to it, and its early application, see Popkin, M., “Guatemala's national reconciliation law: combatting impunity or continuing it?,” Revista IIDH 4(1997), p. 173Google Scholar.

27 “Guatemala Memory of Silence, Report of the Commission for Historical Clarification, Conclusion and Recommendations” (February 1999 ), p. 41Google Scholar.

28 Ibid., p. 58Google Scholar.

29 South African Interim Constitution, epilogueGoogle Scholar.

30 AZAPO v. President of the Republic of South Africa, CCT 17/96, at 29 (July 29, 1996Google Scholar).

31 Amnesty Decision on Death of Steve Biko” (press release issued by Truth and Reconciliation Commission, South Africa, February 16, 1999). http://www.truth.org.za/pr/p990216a.htmGoogle Scholar.

32 Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Final Report, October 29, 1998, vol. 5, chap. 8, p. 309Google Scholar.

33 Neier, Aryeh, War Crimes: Brutality, Genocide, Terror and the Struggle for Justice (New York: Times Books, 1998), p. 105Google Scholar.

34 See generally Roht-Arriaza and Gibson, “The Developing Jurisprudence on Amnesty”Google Scholar.