Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T07:33:58.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Humanity, International Crime, and the Rights of Defendants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Larry May
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium
Information
Ethics & International Affairs , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , September 2006 , pp. 373 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For Altman's good defense against my alternative, see Andrew Altman and Christopher Heath Wellman, “A Defense of International Criminal Law,” Ethics 115, no. 1 (2004), pp. 35–67.

2 See the discussion of solidarity in my book, The Socially Responsive Self: Social Theory and Professional Ethics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).

3 Larry May, War Crimes and Just Wars (New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).

4 See his extremely important paper, “A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity,” Yale Journal of International Law 29, no. 1 (2004), pp. 85–140.

5 I take up this issue in much greater detail in my new book manuscript, Aggression and Crimes Against Peace, where I spend a section trying to sort out what exactly is the precedent of Nuremberg.

6 Elizabeth Kiss voiced this objection concerning such alternatives as the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Also see her excellent essay, “Moral Ambition Within and Beyond Political Constraints: Reflections on Restorative Justice,” in Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, eds., Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000), pp. 68–98.