Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2012
That the Arctic is undergoing transformative changes driven in large part by external forces is no longer news. The high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, which are not themselves significant sources of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) or short-lived climate pollutants (such as black carbon soot), are experiencing effects attributable to climate change that are equal to or greater than those occurring in any of the planet's other large regions. Prominent among these effects are rising surface temperatures, a deepening of the active layer of the permafrost, the collapse of sea ice, increases in the intensity of coastal storm surges made possible by the retreat of sea ice, the accelerated melting of the Greenland ice sheet, and the acidification of marine systems. The deposition of black carbon in the high north alone—almost 60 percent of which is thought to originate in Europe—appears to account for half or more of the increase in temperature occurring in the Arctic. Positive feedback processes, such as lowered albedo (that is, the capacity of Earth's surface to reflect incoming solar radiation back into space) following the melting of ice at sea and snow on land, have the effect of magnifying the impact of these external forces. Nowhere is the challenge of adapting to the impacts of climate change more urgent than in Arctic coastal communities confronted with the need to relocate to avoid physical destruction. And nowhere are the threats to individual species (for example, the polar bear) and whole ecosystems more severe than they are in the Arctic, where biophysical changes are outstripping the capacity of plants and animals to adapt to altered conditions.
2 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Snow, Water, Ice, and Permafrost in the Arctic Region (Oslo: AMAP, 2011).
3 Cavalieri, Sandra et al., EU Arctic Footprint and Policy Assessment (Berlin: Ecologic Institute, 2010)Google Scholar.
4 UNEP/WMO, “Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone”; www.unep.org/dewa/Portal/67/pdf/BlackCarbon/_SDM.pdf; and “Climate Change in the Arctic: Beating a Retreat,” Economist, September 24, 2011.
5 Government Accountability Office, Alaska Native Villages: Limited Progress Has Been Made on Relocating Villages Threatened by Flooding and Erosion, GAO-09-551 (Washington, D.C.: GAO, 2009)Google Scholar.
6 Larry Greenemeier, “U.S. Protects Polar Bears under Endangered Species Act,” Scientific American, May 14, 2008; www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=polar-bears-threatened.
7 UNEP/IOC-UNESCO, An Assessment of Assessments, “Why a Global Marine Assessment”; www.unga-regular-process.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1&Itemid=2.
9 For an account of the idea of stewardship from the perspective of the natural sciences, see Chapin, F. Stuart III et al. , “Earth Stewardship: A Strategy for Social-ecological Transformation to Reverse Planetary Degradation,” Journal of Environmental Studies and Science 1 (2011), pp. 44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar. A social science perspective can be found in Griffiths, Franklyn, “Stewardship as Concept and Practice in an Arctic Context,” CyberDialogue, University of Toronto, 2012Google Scholar.
10 Note that what constitutes an actionable harm in one legal or political setting may not be actionable in another.
11 Leopold, Aldo, A Sand County Almanac, With Essays on Conservation from Round River (New York: Ballantine Books, 1970)Google Scholar.
12 European Commission, “Developing a European Union Policy Towards the Arctic Region: Progress Since 2008 and Next Steps,” Joint Communication to the European Parliament, Brussels, June 26, 2012.
13 European Commission, “Trade in Seal Products” (2012); http://ec.europa.eu/environment/biodiversity/animal_welfare/seals/seal_hunting.htm.
14 For a powerful account documenting how hard it is to assign responsibility for environmental harms, see Harr, Jonathan, A Civil Action (New York: Vintage Books, 1970)Google Scholar.
15 Nell Jessup Newton et al., Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law (2005).
16 Berger, Thomas R., Northern Frontier, Northern Homeland: The Report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry (Toronto: James Lorimer, 1977)Google Scholar; and Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples (Ottawa: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, 1996)Google Scholar.
17 John M. Broder and Clifford Krauss, “New and Frozen Frontier Awaits Offshore Oil Drilling,” New York Times, May 23, 2012.
18 Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar.
19 UN General Assembly, “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” A/RES/61/295, 2007.
20 Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, State of the Arctic Environment Report (Oslo: AMAP, 1997, 2002)Google Scholar.
21 “Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, Arctic Climate Impact Assessment: Report to the Arctic Council (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005); www.acia.uaf.edu/pages/scientific.html.
22 Downie, David L. and Fenge, Terry, eds., Northern Lights against POPs: Toxic Threats in the Arctic (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.
23 Arctic Human Development Report, a report to the Arctic Council (Akureyri, Isl.: Stefansson Arctic Institute, 2004)Google Scholar.
24 The UNHDI, developed by the UN Development Programme during the 1990s, adds measures of longevity and education to GDP per capita in an effort to provide a fuller account of human welfare. See hdr.undp.org/en/statistics.
25 Armitage, Derek, Berkes, Fikret, and Doubleday, Nancy, eds., Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-Level Governance (Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2008)Google Scholar.
26 Danish Prime Minister's Office, “The Greenland Self-Government Arrangement”; www.stm.dk/_p_13090.html.
27 Downie and Fenge, eds., Northern Lights against POPs.