Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T11:32:33.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Square summability of variations and convergence of the transfer operator

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

ANDERS JOHANSSON  and
ANDERS ÖBERG
ANDERS JOHANSSON
Affiliation:
Sub-department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Gävle, SE-801 76 Gävle, Sweden (email: ajj@hig.se)
ANDERS ÖBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, PO Box 480, SE-751 06 Uppsala, Sweden (email: anders@math.uu.se)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study the one-sided shift operator on a state space defined by a finite alphabet. Using a scheme developed by Walters [P. Walters. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.353(1) (2001), 327–347], we prove that the sequence of iterates of the transfer operator converges under square summability of variations of the g-function, a condition which gave uniqueness of a g-measure in our earlier work [A. Johansson and A. Öberg. Math. Res. Lett.10(5–6) (2003), 587–601]. We also prove uniqueness of the so-called G-measures, introduced by Brown and Dooley [G. Brown and A. H. Dooley. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys.11 (1991), 279–307], under square summability of variations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 1145 - 1151
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Berger, N., Hoffman, C. and Sidoravicius, V.. Non-uniqueness for specifications in l 2+ϵ. Preprint, 2005. Available at www.arxiv.org (PR/0312344).Google Scholar
[2]Brown, G. and Dooley, A. H.. Odometer actions on G-measures. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 11 (1991), 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Dooley, A. H. and Stenflo, Ö.. A criterion for uniqueness in G-measures and perfect sampling. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 140 (2006), 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Fan, A. H.. On uniqueness of G-measures and g-measures. Studia Math. 119(3) (1996), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hulse, P.. An example of non-unique g-measures. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26 (2006), 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Keane, M.. Strongly mixing g-measures. Invent. Math. 16 (1972), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Johansson, A. and Öberg, A.. Square summability of variations of g-functions and uniqueness ofg-measures. Math. Res. Lett. 10(5–6) (2003), 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Johansson, A., Öberg, A. and Pollicott, M.. Countable state shifts and uniqueness of g-measures. Amer. J. Math. 129(6) (2007), 1501–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Neveu, J.. Mathematical Foundations of the Calculus of Probability. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1965.Google Scholar
[10]Pollicott, M.. Rates of mixing for potentials of summable variation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000), 843–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Shiryaev, A. N.. Absolute continuity and singularity of probability measures in functional spaces. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Helsinki, 1978). Vol. 1. Acad. Sci. Fennica, Helsinki, 1980, pp. 209–225.Google Scholar
[12]Walters, P.. Ruelle’s operator theorem and g-measures. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 214 (1975), 375–387.Google Scholar
[13]Walters, P.. Convergence of the Ruelle operator for a function satisfying Bowen’s condition. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353(1) (2001), 327–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Williams, D.. Probability with Martingales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar