No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Rokhlin's School in ergodic theory
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 September 2008
Extract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Ergodic theory is one of several fields of mathematics where the name Vladimir Abramovich Rokhlin (spelled also ‘Rochlin’ and ‘Rohlin’) is well known to the specialists. That name is attached to some very often used theorems, but the goal of this paper is not just to remind the reader of these theorems. I put them in the context of the general development of ergodic theory during the thirty years 1940–70. Most of all, I want to emphasize that Rokhlin was not only a researcher producing powerful results but also a founder of schools at the two best Universities in the USSR. For at least 10 years (1958–68) these schools dominated ergodic theory. This paper is not biographical. Rokhlin's life certainly deserves a better biographer. However, I mention certain circumstances of a non-mathematical nature where it seems to be appropriate.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
REFERENCES
[1]Abramov, L.. The entropy of derived automorphism. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 128 (1959), 647–650.Google Scholar
[3]Abramov, L.. The entropy of an automorphism of a solenoidal group. Teor. Veroyatnost. i ee Primen. 4 (1959), 249–254.Google Scholar
[4]Abramov, L.. Metric automorphisms with quasi-discrete spectrum. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR ser. mat. 26 (1962), 513–530.Google Scholar
[5]Abramov, L. & Rokhlin, V.. Entropy of a skew product of mappings with invariant measure. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 17 (7) (1962), 5–13.Google Scholar
[6]Adler, R.. A note on the entropy of skew product transformations. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1963), 665–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Arov, D.. The calculation of entropy for a class of group endomorphisms. Zap. Meh. Mat. Fak. i Kharkov. Mat. Obshch. 30 (1964), 48–69.Google Scholar
[8]Belinskaya, R.. Existence of a derived automorphism with quasi-discrete spectrum. Mat. Zametki 3 (1968), 539–540.Google Scholar
[9]Belinskaya, R.. Partitions of Lebesgue space into orbits defined by ergodic automorphisms. Funkt. Analiz i ego Priloz. 2 (3) (1968), 4–16.Google Scholar
[10]Halmos, P. & von Neumann, J.. Operator methods in classical mechanics 2. Ann. of Math. 43 (1942), 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Halmos, P.. On automorphisms of compact groups. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 49 (1943), 619–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Halmos, P.. In general a measure preserving transformation is mixing. Ann. of Math. 45 (1944), 786–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Hopf, E.. Ergodentheorie, Ergenbnisse der Mathematik, Bd. 5. Springer: Berlin, 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Jacobs, K.. Ergodic decomposition of the Kolmogorov-Sinai invariant, in: Ergodic Theory, pp. 173–190. Academic Press: New York, 1963.Google Scholar
[16]Ibragimov, I.. A theorem from the metric theory of continuous fractions. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 1 (1961), 13–24.Google Scholar
[17]Ibragimov, I.. The spectrum of stationary Gaussian sequences satisfying the strong mixing condition, 1. Necessary conditions. Tear. Veroyatnost. i ee Primen. 10 (1965), 95–116.Google Scholar
[18]Katok, A. & Stepin, A.. Approximations in ergodic theory. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 22 (5) (1967), 81–106.Google Scholar
[19]Kolmogorov, A.. New metric invariants of transitive dynamical systems and automorphisms of a Lebesgue space. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 119 (1958), 861–864.Google Scholar
[20]Kolmogorov, A.. The entropy in a unit of time as a metric invariant of automorphisms Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 124 (1959), 754–755.Google Scholar
[21]Makarov, B.. Examples of a singular measure equivalent to its own square by convolution. Vestn. Leningrad. Univ. 7 (1968), 51–54.Google Scholar
[22]Ornstein, D.. Bernoulli shifts with the same entropy are isomorphic. Advances in Math. 4 (1970), 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Ornstein, D.. An example of a Kolmogorov automorphism that is not a Bernoulli shift. Advances in Math. 10 (1973), 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Pinsker, M.. The notion of regularity of random processes. Teoriya Veroyatnost. i ee Primen. 4 (1959) 475–476.Google Scholar
[25]Rokhlin, V.. On a classification of measurable partitions. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 58 (1947), 29–32.Google Scholar
[27]Rokhlin, V.. A ‘general’ measure-preserving transformation is not mixing. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 60 (1948), 349–351.Google Scholar
[28]Rokhlin, V.. On the fundamental ideas of measure theory. Mat. Sb. 25 (1949), 107–150.Google Scholar
[29]Rokhlin, V.. Selected topics from the metric theory of dynamical systems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 4 (2) (1949), 57–128.Google Scholar
[30]Rokhlin, V.. On endomorphisms of compact commutative groups. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 13 (1949), 329–340.Google Scholar
[31]Rokhlin, V.. On the entropy of a metric automorphism. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 124 (1959), 980–983.Google Scholar
[32]Rokhlin, V.. New progress in the theory of transformations with invariant measure. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 15 (4) (1960), 3–26.Google Scholar
[33]Rokhlin, V.. Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 25 (1961), 499–530.Google Scholar
[34]Rokhlin, V.. The entropy of an automorphism of a compact commutative group. Teoriya Veroyatnost. i ee Primen. 6 (1961), 351–352.Google Scholar
[35]Rokhlin, V.. An axiomatic definition of the entropy of a transformation with invariant measure. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 148 (1963), 779–781.Google Scholar
[36]Rokhlin, V.. Generators in ergodic theory. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 1 (1963), 26–32.Google Scholar
[37]Rokhlin, V.. Metric properties of endomorphisms of compact commutative groups. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 28 (1964), 867–874.Google Scholar
[38]Rokhlin, V.. Generators in ergodic theory II. Vestnik Leningrad. Univ., 20 (13) (1965), 68–72.Google Scholar
[39]Rokhlin, V.. Lectures on the entropy theory of transformations with invariant measure. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 22 (5) (1967), 3–56.Google Scholar
[40]Rokhlin, V. & Fomin, S.. Spectral theory of dynamical systems, in: Proc. Third All-Union Math. Congress, vol. 3, pp. 284–292. Akad. Nauk SSSR: Moscow, 1958.Google Scholar
[41]Rokhlin, V. & Sinai, Ya.. Construction and properties of invariant measurable partitions. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 141 (1961), 1038–1041.Google Scholar
[42]Sinai, Ya.. On the notion of entropy of a dynamical system. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 124 (1959), 768–771.Google Scholar
[43]Sinai, Ya.. Dynamical systems and stationary Markov processes. Teoriya Veroyatnost. i ee Primen. 5 (1960), 335–338.Google Scholar
[44]Sinai, Ya.. Central limit theorem for geodesic flows on manifolds of constant negative curvature. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 133 (1960), 1303–1306.Google Scholar
[45]Sinai, Ya.. K-systems and geodesic flows on manifolds of constant negative curvature. Dissertation inPhys.-Math. Sci., Moscow State Univ.: Moscow 1960.Google Scholar
[46]Sinai, Ya.. Geodesic flows on compact surfaces of negative curvature. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 136 (1961), 549–552.Google Scholar
[47]Sinai, Ya.. Dynamical systems with countably multiple Lebesgue spectrum 1. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 25 (1961), 899–924.Google Scholar
[48]Sudakov, V.. The existence of variables independent of several given ones. in: Trans. 4th Prague Conf. Information Theory, Statistical Decision Functions. Random Processes, 1965, pp. 589–594. Prague 1967.Google Scholar
[49]Vershik, A.. On the theory of normal dynamical systems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 144 (1962), 9–12.Google Scholar
[50]Vershik, A.. The spectral and metric isomorphisms of certain normal dynamical systems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 144 (1962), 255–257.Google Scholar
[51]Vershik, A.. Measurable realization of continuous automorphism groups of a unitary ring. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 29 (1965), 127–136.Google Scholar
[52]Vershik, A.. Theorem on lacunary isomorphisms of monotonic sequences of partitions. Funkt. Analiz i ego Priloz. 2 (3) (1968), 17–21.Google Scholar
[53]Vershik, A.. Decreasing sequences of measurable partitions and their applications. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 193 (1970), 748–751.Google Scholar
[54]Yuzvinsky, S.. Metric properties of automorphisms of locally compact commutative groups. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 6 (1965), 244–267.Google Scholar
[55]Yuzvinsky, S.. Metric properties of endomorphisms of compact groups. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 29 (1965), 1295–1338.Google Scholar
[56]Yuzvinsky, S.. Metric automorphisms with a simple spectrum. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 172 (1967), 1036–1038.Google Scholar
[57]Yuzvinsky, S.. Computation of the entropy of a group endomorphism. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh. 8 (1967), 230–239.Google Scholar
[58]Yuzvinsky, S.. The absence of ergodic automorphisms on non-compact connected groups. Uch. Zap. Leningrad. Ped. Inst. 387 (1968), 257–262.Google Scholar
[59]Yuzvinsky, S.. Metric properties of endomorphisms on homogeneous spaces of compact groups. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, ser. mat. 35 (1971), 78–82.Google Scholar
[60]Yuzvinsky, S.. On the entropy of a sequence of partitions generated by an endomorphism. Funkl. Analiz i ego Priloz. 6 (3) (1972), 87–88.Google Scholar
[61]Aoki, N.. Dense orbits of automorphisms and compactness of groups. Topology and its Applications 20 (1985), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[62]Furstenberg, H.. Ergodic behavior of diagonal measures and a theorem on arithmetic progressions. J. d'Analyse Math. 31 (1977), 204–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[63]Kalikow, S.A.. Twofold mixing implies threefold mixing for rank one transformations. Ergod. Theory & Dynam. Sys. 4 (1984), 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[64]Kaufman, R. & Rajagopalan, M.. On automorphisms of a locally compact group. Mich. Math J. 13 (1966), 373–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[65]Rajagopalan, M.. Ergodic properties of automorphisms of a locally compact group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17 (1966), 372–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[66]Wu, T.S.. Continuous automorphisms on locally compact groups. Mat. Z. 96 (1967), 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[67]Krieger, W.. On entropy and generators of measure-preserving transformations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (1970), 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access