Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T16:01:24.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the notion of the dimension with respect to a dynamical system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Ya. B. Pesin
Affiliation:
All-Union Extra-Mural Construction Engineering Institute, Sredne Kalitnikovskaja St., 30, Moscow, 109807, USSR
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

For the invariant sets of dynamical systems a new notion of dimension-the so-called dimension with respect to a dynamical system-is introduced. It has some common features with the general topological notion of the dimension, but it also reflects the dynamical properties of the system. In the one-dimensional case it coincides with the Hausdorff dimension. For multi-dimensional hyperbolic sets formulae for the calculation of our dimension are obtained. These results are generalizations of Manning's results obtained by him for the Hausdorff dimension in the two-dimensional case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

REFERENCES

[1]Afraimovich, V. A. & Pesin, Ya. B.. Estimations of the dimension of a hyperbolic set in the neighbourhood of a homoclinic point. Russian Math. Surveys,(1984). To appear.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Billingsley, P.. Ergodic Theory and Information Wiley: New York 1965.Google Scholar
[3]Bowen, R.. Topological entropy for noncompact sets. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 184 (1973), 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Maths 470, Springer: Berlin, 1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Bowen, R. & Rouelle, D.. The ergodic theory of Axiom A flows. Invent Math. 29 (1975), 181202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Douady, A. & Oesterlé, J.. Dimension de Hausdorff des attracteures. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 24 (1980), 11351138.Google Scholar
[7]Federer, F., Geometric Measure Theory. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 1969.Google Scholar
[8]Hurewicz, W. & Wallman, H.. Dimension Theory. Princeton Univ. Press: Princeton, 1941.Google Scholar
[9]Katok, A.. Lyapunov exponents, entropy and periodic orbits for diffeomorphisms. Publ. Math. IHES, 51 (1980), 137170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Ledrappier, F.. Some relations between dimension and Lyapunov exponents. Comm. Math. Phys., 81 (1981), 229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]McCluskey, H. & Manning, A.. Hausdorff dimension for horseshoes. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 3 (1983), 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Manning, A.. A relation between Lyapunov exponents, Hausdorff dimension and entropy. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 451–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Pesin, Ya. B. & Sinai, Ya. G.. Hyperbolicity and Stochasticity of Dynamical Systems. Math. -Phys. Review 2, 53116; Harwood Acad. Publ. GMBH.Google Scholar
[14]Ruelle, D. & Takens, F.. On the nature of turbulence. Comm. Math. Phys. 20 (1971), 167192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sinai, Ya. G.. Gibbs measures in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 27 (1972), 2164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Takens, F.. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Springer Lect. Notes in Math, 898 (1981), 366381.Google Scholar
[17]Young, L. -S.. Capacity of attractors. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Syst. 1 (1981), 381388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar