Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-w95db Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-08T22:59:45.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamical decompositions of $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}X\setminus X$

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2015

YEVHEN ZELENYUK
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa email yevhen.zelenyuk@wits.ac.za, yuliya.zelenyuk@wits.ac.za
YULIYA ZELENYUK
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, South Africa email yevhen.zelenyuk@wits.ac.za, yuliya.zelenyuk@wits.ac.za

Abstract

Let $X$ be a locally compact, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$-compact, non-compact Hausdorff space and let $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}X$ be the Stone-Čech compactification of $X$. Let $G$ be a countably infinite discrete group continuously acting on $X$, and suppose that, for every $g\in G$, $\text{Fix}(g)=\{x\in X:gx=x\}$ is compact. The action of $G$ on $X$ induces the action on $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}X$, and so on $X^{\ast }=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}X\setminus X$. Let ${\mathcal{D}}$ denote the finest decomposition of $X^{\ast }$ into closed invariant subsets such that the corresponding quotient space of $X^{\ast }$ is Hausdorff. Such a decomposition can be defined for any action of $G$ on a compact Hausdorff space. Applying it to every member of ${\mathcal{D}}$ gives us a decomposition ${\mathcal{D}}^{2}$ of $X^{\ast }$, then ${\mathcal{D}}^{3}$, and so on. We show that (1) ${\mathcal{D}}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{1}}$ is the coarsest decomposition of $X^{\ast }$ into closed invariant topologically transitive subsets, (2) there is a dense subset of points $p\in X^{\ast }$ such that $\overline{Gp}\in {\mathcal{D}}^{2}\setminus {\mathcal{D}}$, in particular, ${\mathcal{D}}$ is non-trivial and ${\mathcal{D}}^{2}$ is finer than ${\mathcal{D}}$, and (3) for every ordinal $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}<\unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{1}$, there is $p\in X^{\ast }$ such that $\overline{Gp}\in {\mathcal{D}}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+2}\setminus {\mathcal{D}}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}+1}$, so all the decompositions ${\mathcal{D}}^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}$, $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\leq \unicode[STIX]{x1D714}_{1}$, are distinct.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botha, G. and Zelenyuk, Y.. On closed left ideal decompositions of G . Topology Appl. 160 (2013), 133136.Google Scholar
Botha, G., Zelenyuk, Y. and Zelenyuk, Yu.. Finer closed left ideal decompositions of G . Topology Appl. 165 (2014), 5863.Google Scholar
Davenport, D. and Hindman, N.. A proof of van Douwen’s right ideal theorem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 113 (1991), 573580.Google Scholar
Engelking, R.. General Topology. Heldermann, Berlin, 1989.Google Scholar
Filali, M. and Salmi, P.. Slowly oscillating functions in semigroup compactifications and convolution algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 250 (2007), 144166.Google Scholar
Gillman, L. and Jerison, M.. Rings of Continuous Functions. van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ, 1960.Google Scholar
Hindman, N. and Strauss, D.. Algebra in the Stone-Čech Compactification. De Gruyter, Berlin, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protasov, I.. Coronas of balleans. Topology Appl. 149 (2005), 149160.Google Scholar
Toko, W. and Zelenyuk, Yu.. Continuous right zero homomorphisms of U (S). Topology Appl. 159 (2012), 744748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelenyuk, Y.. Ultrafilters and Topologies on Groups. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2011.Google Scholar
Zelenyuk, Y.. Closed left ideal decompositions of U (G). Canad. Math. Bull. 56 (2013), 442448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar