Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T10:33:59.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of inactivators in the evaluation of disinfectants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

I. H. MacKinnon
I. H. MacKinnon
Affiliation:
Disinfection Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since the earliest days of disinfectant testing bacteriostatic effect has misled many workers in this field. This problem has long been appreciated by some and a considerable battery of neutralizers has been employed, often with great success. Other anti-bacteriostatic measures, used without control, fail to revive damaged though viable organisms.

This paper sets out to describe some of the problems that are encountered in this confused field and the means whereby they may be overcome.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 189 - 195
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Bergan, T. & Lystad, A. (1972). Evaluation of disinfectant inactivators. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica Section B, 80, 507.Google ScholarPubMed
Brewer, J. H. (1940). A clear liquid medium for ‘aerobic’ cultivation of anaerobes. Journal of Bacteriology 39, 10.Google Scholar
British Standard 3286: 1960. Method for Laboratory Evaluation of Disinfectant Activity of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds. London, British Standards Institute.Google Scholar
Chiori, C. O., Hambleton, R. & Rigby, G. J. (1965). The inhibition of spores of Bacillus subtilis by Cetrimide retained on washed membrane filters and on the washed spores. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 28, 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, G. E. (1949). Quaternary ammonium compounds: a new technique for the study of their bactericidal action and the results obtained with Cetavlon. Journal of Hygiene 47, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englesberg, E. (1952). The mutagenic action of formaldehyde on bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 63, 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engley, F. B. & Dey, B. P. (1970). A universal neutralizing medium for antimicrobial chemicals. Chemical Specialities Manufacturers' Association, Proceedings of 56th. Mid-Year Meeting, 1970.Google Scholar
Flett, L. H., Haring, R. C., Guiteras, A. F. & Shapiro Rebecca, L. The revival of organisms presumably killed by phenol. Journal of Bacteriology 50, 591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geppert, J. (1889). Zur Lehre von den Antisepticis. Berliner klinische Wochenschrift 26, 789, 819.Google Scholar
Gershenfeld, L. & Witlin, B. (1950). Iodine as an antiseptic. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 53, 177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, A., Cofone, L. & Huff, M. B. (1973). Iodine inactivating agent in surgical scrub testing. Archives of Surgery 106, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, N. D. (1963). The influence of the recovery medium and the incubation temperature on the survival of damaged bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 26, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. (1973). Hibitane Handbook.Google Scholar
Kayser, A. & Van der Ploeg, G. (1965). Growth inhibition of Staphylococci by sodium thiosulphate. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 28, 286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallman, W. L. & Cary, W. (1933). Study of bacteriological methods of testing and means of disinfecting water with chlorine. American Journal of Public Health 23, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. S., Gunnison, J. B. & Luxen, M. P. (1940). Testing for the sterility of biological products. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 43, 672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClung, L. S. (1940). The use of dehydrated thioglycollate medium in the enrichment of spore-forming anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 40, 645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCulloch, E. C., Hauge, S. & Migaki, H. (1949). The quaternary ammonium compounds in sanitization. American Journal of Public Health 38, 493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudge, C. S. & Smith, F. R. (1935). Relation of action of chlorine to bacterial death. American Journal of Public Health 25, 442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, T. & Hirsch, Anne. (1954). The revival of formaldehyde-treated bacteria. Journal of Applied Chemistry 4, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubbo, S. D. & Gardner, Joan F. (1965). A Review of Sterilization and Disinfection. London: Lloyd-Luke.Google Scholar
United States Pharmacopeia. (1960). Sixteenth revision.Google Scholar
Valko, E. I. & Dubois, A. S. (1944). The antibacterial action of surface active cations. Journal of Bacteriology 47, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, G. R. & Black, L. A. (1948). Inhibitors for neutralizing the germicidal action of quaternary ammonium compounds. Soap and Sanitary Chemicals 27, (9), 137.Google Scholar