Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T07:09:11.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swine vesicular disease: virological studies of experimental infections produced by the England/72 virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. Burrows ,
J. A. Mann  and
D. Goodridge
R. Burrows
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
J. A. Mann
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
D. Goodridge
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Pigs exposed to relatively small amounts of virus by intradermal inoculation of the feet or by skin scarification developed clinical disease. Large amounts of virus were recovered from samples taken from the nose, mouth, pharynx, rectum and the prepuce or vagina during the first week of infection and smaller amounts during the second week. Virus was recovered from the faeces of most animals 16 days after infection and from one animal for 23 days. Pigs in contact with inoculated animals were killed at intervals before the appearance of clinical disease. The distribution and amounts of virus in various tissues indicated that infection had most likely gained entry through the skin or the epithelia and mucosae of the digestive tract. Some pigs acquired subclinical infections in which no virus excretion was detected and no transmission of infection to susceptible pigs took place over a period of 5 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , February 1974 , pp. 135 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Burrows, R. (1966). The infectivity assay of foot-and-mouth disease virus in pigs. Journal of Hygiene 64, 419.Google ScholarPubMed
Burrows, R., Greig, A. & Goodridge, D. (1973). Swine vesicular disease. Research in Veterinary Science 15, 141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Castro, M. P. (1964). Behaviour of the foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell cultures: susceptibility of the IB-RS-2 cell line. Archivos do Institute biologico, São Paulo 31, 63.Google Scholar
Dawe, P. S., Forman, A. J. & Smale, C. J. (1973). A preliminary investigation of the swine vesicular disease epidemic in Britain. Nature, London 241, 540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhennin, L. & Dhennin, L. (1973). La maladie vésiculeuse du pore. Son apparition en France. Bulletin de I'Académie vétérinaire de France 46, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1973). Swine vesicular disease. Veterinary Record 92, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, G. N., Darbyshire, J. H. & Huntley, J. F. (1972). Differentiation of a vesicular disease of pigs in Hong Kong from foot-and-mouth disease. Veterinary Record 90, 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardelli, L., Lodetti, E., Gualandi, G. L., Burrows, R., Goodridge, D., Brown, F. & Cartwright, B. (1968). A foot-and-mouth disease syndrome in pigs caused by an enterovirus. Nature, London 219, 1275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sellers, R. F. & Herniman, K. A. J (1974). The airborne excretion by pigs of swine vesicular disease virus. Journal of Hygiene 72, 61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed