Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T21:40:13.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources of salmonellas in market swine*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. P. Williams Jr
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
K. W. Newell
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A commercial swine fattening ration containing animal origin ingredients was shown to be related to the salmonella excretion of market pigs being sent to slaughter from a well-managed farm. When similar animals from this farm were fed a ration of much lower salmonella content, due to exclusion of ingredients of animal origin, their excretion declined as measured by both rectal and caecal swabs. When subsequent lots of pigs consumed a pelleted weaner ration and the special supplement only, before being exposed to a supplement containing the usual level of contamination, they seemed to be refractory to infection. Probably, this was a function of age at first exposure.

With prospective methods it was possible to show that salmonellas from the abattoir environment could infect pigs, that they would excrete them within a very short time, and that organisms from this source could be demonstrated at slaughter and shown to be a cause of carcass contamination.

While these findings support the view that the build-up of salmonellas hi pigs is by contact with a contaminated environment, they indicate that the primary source of the contamination is most probably the salmonella-excreting pig which has consumed contaminated feed ingredients on its farm of origin.

If the great majority of pigs went to slaughter salmonella-free they would not serve as a source of infection to other pigs being sent to slaughter. Their intestinal contents could not contaminate carcass sides in the slaughtering process. This should help to prevent the contamination with salmonellas of the food preparation area of both homes and commercial eating establishments.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

References

Edel, W., Guinée, P. A. M., Van Schothorst, M. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1966). Studies on the occurrence of Salmonella in pigs fattened with pellets and non-pelleted meal. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 91, 962–6.Google Scholar
Felsenfeld, O., Young, V. M. & Yoshimura, T. (1950). A survey of Salmonella organisms in market meat, eggs, and milk. J. Am. vet. med. Ass. 116, 1721.Google Scholar
Galton, M. M. (1962). Laboratory procedures for the isolation of salmonella from human and animal food products. Proc. U.S. Livestk sanit. Ass., 65th meeting, pp. 434–40.Google Scholar
Galton, M. M., Lowery, W. D. & Hardy, A. B. (1954). Salmonella in fresh and smoked pork sausage. J. infect. Dis. 95, 232–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galton, M. M., Smith, W. V., McElrath, H. B. & Hardy, A. B. (1954). Salmonella in swine, cattle and the environment of abattoirs. J. infect. Dis. 95, 236–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D. A. & Jewell, P. A. (1965). A method of measuring food passage rate in pigs by means of polystyrene markers. Br. vet. J. 121, 83–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, J., Guinée, P. A. M., Kampelmacher, E. H. & Van Keulen, A. (1963). Studies on the incidence of Salmonella in imported fish meal. Zentbl. VetMed. 10, 542–50.Google Scholar
Kampelmacher, E. H., Guinée, P. A. M. & Van Keulen, A. (1965). Prevalence of salmonellae in pigs fed contaminated and normal feeds. Zentbl. VetMed. 12, 258–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Leistner, L., Johantges, J., Deibel, R. H. & Niven, C. F. Jr. (1961). The occurrence and significance of salmonellae in meat animals and animal by-product feeds. Proc. 13th Res. Conf. Am. Meat Inst. Fedn pp. 919.Google Scholar
McDonagh, V. P. & Smith, H. G. (1958) The significance of the abbatoir in salmonella infection in Bradford. J. Hyg., Camb. 56, 271–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, K. C. & Shaffer, M. F. (1952). Bacteriologic Studies of Experimental Salmonella Infections in Chicks. J. infect. Dis. 90, 8196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newell, K. W., McClarin, R., Murdock, C. R., MacDonald, W. N. & Hutchinson, H. L. (1959). Salmonellosis in Northern Ireland, with special reference to pigs and salmonella-contaminated pig meal. J. Hyg., Camb. 57, 92105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shotts, E. B. Jr., Martin, W. T. & Galton, M. M. (1962). Further studies on Salmonella in human and animal foods and in the environment of processing plants. Proc. U.S. Livestk sanit. Ass., 65th meeting, pp. 308–18.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1960). The effect of feeding pigs on food naturally contaminated with salmonellae. J. Hyg., Camb. 58, 381–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, L. P. Jr. (1965). Meat as a source of infection by Salmonella. Proc. 18th a. recipr. Meat Conf. pp. 20–9.Google Scholar
Williams, L. P. Jr. & Newell, K. W. (1967). Patterns of Salmonella excretion in market swine. Am. J. publ. Hlth 57, 466–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E., Paffenberger, R. S. Jr., Foster, M. J. & Lewis, K. H. (1961). Prevalence of Salmonella in meat and poultry products. J. infect. Dis. 109, 166–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed