Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T08:11:13.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Formation of Specific Anti-Bodies in the Blood following upon Treatment with the Sera of different Animals, together with their Use in Legal Medicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. H. F. Nuttall  and
E. M. Dinkelspiel
G. H. F. Nuttall
Affiliation:
University Lecturer in Bacteriology and Preventive Medicine, Cambridge
E. M. Dinkelspiel
Affiliation:
From the Pathological Laboratory of the University of Cambridge.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the thirteen years which have elapsed since the publication of my researches upon the bactericidal properties of the blood and other fluids of the body, a large amount of most valuable knowledge has been acquired regarding the blood both in health and disease. Through the work of many investigators the complicated subject of immunity is gradually being solved, and we are beginning to understand the way in which the body combats or is protected against the inroads of disease. We have learnt of the existence of specific antitoxic, agglutinative, haemolytic, bactericidal and cellulicidal properties in the blood-serum, etc., as also of a number of neutralizing bodies to these. The quite recent discovery of specific precipitins, which act upon various bacterial products, milks, peptone, egg-albumin, and upon human blood and its derivates, has opened a wide field for investigation, which cannot fail to ultimately yield results of the greatest importance. We have to thank bacteriological investigation for the greater part of the advances which have been made, although a considerable portion properly belongs in the domain of physiology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1901 , pp. 367 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1901

References

Literature

Bordet, J. (10. 1898), Sur l'agglutination et la dissolution des globules rouges par le sérum d'animaux injectés de sang défebriné. Annales de I'Institut Pasteur, vol. xii. pp. 688–695.Google Scholar
Bordet, J. (03, 1899), Le mécanisme de l'agglutination. Annales de I'Institut Pasteur, vol. xiii. pp. 225–250.Google Scholar
Bordet, J. and Gengou, O. (03, 1901), Recherches sur la coagulation du sang et les sérums anticoagulants. Annales de I'Institut Pasteur, vol. xv. pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
Dieudonné, A. (2 04, 1901), Beiträge zum biologischen Nachweis von Menschenblut. Münchener med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xlviii. pp. 533–534.Google Scholar
Fisch, C. (02. 1901), Studies on Lactoserum and other Cell-Sera. St Louis Courier of Medicine. (Cited by Wassermann and Schütze, 18 Feb. 1901.)Google Scholar
Kraus, R. (12 08. 1897), Ueber specifische Reactionen in keimfreien Filtraten aus Cholera, Typhus und Pestbouillonculturen, erzeugt durch homologes Serum. Wiener klin. Wochenschr., Jahrg. x. pp. 736–738.Google Scholar
Leclainche, E. and Vallée, H. (25 01. 1901), Note sur les anticorps albumineux. Compt. rend, de la Soc. de Biologie, vol. liii. No. 3; also La Semaine médicale, 1901, No. 4.Google Scholar
Mertens, E. (14 03, 1901), Ein biologischer Beweis für die Herkunft des Albumen in Nephritisharn aus dem Blute. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvii. pp. 161, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, W. (14 07, 1900), On Immunity against Proteids. Lancet, vol. ii. pp. 98–100; also Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. vol. xxviii. pp. 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolle, C. (03, 1898), Recherches sur la substance agglutinée. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur, vol. xii. pp. 161–191.Google Scholar
Nolf, P. (05, 1900), Contribution à l'étude des sérum antihématiques. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur, vol. xiv. pp. 297–330.Google Scholar
Schütze, A. (29 01. 1901), Ueber ein biologisches Verfahren zur Differenzirung der Eiweissstoffe verschiedener Milcharten. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infektionskr., vol. xxxvi. pp. 5–8. (See also Wassermann and Schütze.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, R. (28 02. 1901), Ueber den Nachweis menschlichen Blutes durch ein “Antiserum.” Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvii. p. 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchistovitch, Th. (1899), Études sur l'immunisation contre le sérum d'anguilles. Annales de l'Inst. Pasteur, vol. xiii. pp. 406–425. (See p. 413 especially.)Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, (15 11. 1900), Neuer Beitrag zum specifischen Nachweis von Eiereiweiss auf biologischem Wege. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvi. pp. 734–735.Google Scholar
Uhlenhuth, (7 02. 1901), Eine Methode zur Unterscheidung der verschiedenen Blutarten, im besondern zum differentialdiagnostischen Nachweise des Menschenblutes. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvii. pp. 82, 83.Google Scholar
Wassermann, A. and Schütze, A. (2 07, 1900; Verein f. innere Med., Berlin), Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Eiweissstoffe verschiedener Milcharten. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvi. Vereinsbeilage, 26 July, 1900, p. 178.Google Scholar
Wassermann, A. and Schütze, A. (18 02. 1901), Ueber eine neue forensische Methode zur Unterscheidung von Menschen- und Thierblut. Berliner klin. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxxviii. pp. 187–190.Google Scholar
Zuelzer, G. (4 04, 1901), Zur Frage der biologischen Reaktion auf Eiweiss in Blut und Harn. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Jahrg. xxvii. pp. 219–220.Google Scholar