Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T18:45:39.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on the Cause of Certain Red Colorations on Salted Hides and a Comparison of the Growth and Survival of Halophilic or Salt-loving Organisms and Some Ordinary Organisms of Dirt and Putrefaction on Media of Varying Salt Concentrations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Madge E. Robertson
Affiliation:
(From the Laboratories of the British leather Manufacturers‘ Research Association, Lister Institute.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hides and calf skins cured with marine salts, especially if kept under conditions of warmth and moisture, tend to develop on the flesh side large areas of brick-red coloration. Similar red colorations have, for many years, been noted as occurring in similar conditions on salted fish, and a number of investigations have been made as to their cause, the first recorded being that of Farlow (1878). Following him were Mauriac (1886), Ewart (1887), Layet (1887), Le Dantec (1891) and, in recent years, Harrison and Kennedy (1922), Browne (1921–22) and Cloake (1923). All these workers have agreed in attributing the red coloration on salted fish to the growth of one or several species of redcoloured organisms, and the more recent workers (Harrison and Kennedy, Browne, Cloake) trace these organisms to the sea salt used in curing the fish, and find them to be chromogenic bacteria only capable of growth in a high concentration of salt. Clayton and Gibbs (1927) have examined many solar brines and salts, and have found that “they almost invariably contain microorganisms which only exist and develop in the presence of abundance of common salt.” Sturges and Heidemann (1923, 1924) have isolated many saltloving organisms from meat-curing solutions, and Le Fèvre and Round (1919) from the brine of pickled cucumber.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

References

REFERENCES

Browne, (19211922). Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. & Med. N.Y. 19, 321–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, and Gibbs, (1927). The Analyst, 52, 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cloake, (1923). Dept. of Sci. & Ind. Res. Food Investigation Board, Special Rept. No. 18, 23.Google Scholar
Dubois, (1910). C.R. Soc. Biol. 68, 26.Google Scholar
Duthoit, (1923). C.R. Soc. Biol. 89, 548, 550, 553.Google Scholar
Ewart, (1887). 6th Ann. Rept. of the Fishery Board for Scotland, Appendix 204.Google Scholar
Farlow, (1878). U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries, Commissioner's Report, 969.Google Scholar
Guillemard, (1909). C.R. Soc. Biol. 67, 538.Google Scholar
Harrison, and Kennedy, (1922). Rept. II, Hon. Advisory Council for Sci. and Ind. Res. Canada.Google Scholar
Hill, and White, (1929). J. Bact. 18, 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layet, (1887). Bull. U.S. Fish Commission, 7, 90.Google Scholar
Le Dantec, (1891). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 5, 656.Google Scholar
Le Fèvre, and Round, (1919). J. Bact. 4, 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauriac, (1886). U.S. Commission of Fish and Fisheries, Commissioner's Report, 1027.Google Scholar
Stather, and Liebscher, (1929). Collegium, 427.Google Scholar
Sturges, and Heidemann, (1923). Abstr. Bact. 7, 11.Google Scholar
Sturges, and Heidemann, (1924). Abstr. Bact. 8, 14.Google Scholar