Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T01:57:19.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding and breeding of laboratory animals III. Observations on the feeding of guinea-pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. M. Bruce
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical ResearchHampstead, N.W.3
A. S. Parkes
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical ResearchHampstead, N.W.3
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A dry pelleted diet is described which, supplemented with fresh greenstuff, dried cabbage, or ascorbic acid, is highly satisfactory for the growth and maintenance of guinea-pigs.

2. No evidence could be found that the pelleted diet alone was deficient in any other factor than vitamin C required by guinea-pigs, fresh greens and dehydrated cabbage being effective because of their high content of this vitamin.

3. Vitamin C added to the diet as crystalline ascorbic acid or as present in dried lucerne meal is mostly destroyed by the pelleting process and is further reduced during storage.

4. The aim of evolving a dry pelleted stable diet completely adequate for guinea-pigs has not yet been realized.

It is a pleasure to acknowledge our indebtedness to Miss M. Olliver, Messrs Chivers & Sons Ltd., who carried out the ascorbic acid determinations and gave us much valuable advice.

Our thanks are also due to Roche Products, who gave us the ascorbic acid, to the Director of Messrs Chivers & Sons Ltd. for the generous gift of 1 cwt. of standard dehydrated cabbage, to the Dehydration Division of the Ministry of Food for supplying two samples of sub-standard dehydrated cabbage, and to Mr D. G. Short, senior technician in charge of the animals at the Institute, who prepared the small-scale diets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1947

References

REFERENCES

Bruce, H. M. & Parkes, A. S. (1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 501.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. B. (1938). J. Allergy, 10, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, M. & Cowgill, G. R. (1935). J. Nutrit. 9, 507.Google Scholar
Ecker, E. E. & Pillemer, L. (1940). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 44, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goettsch, M. & Pappenheimer, A. M. (1931). J. Exp. Med. 54, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. J. & Olliver, M. (1942). Biochem. J. 36, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, A. G. & Hamilton, J. W. (1942). J. Nutrit. 23, 533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, A. G. & Ritchie, W. S. (1934). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 219.Google Scholar
Kohler, G. O., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1938). J. Nutrit. 15, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, G. O., Randle, S. B., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1939). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 40, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, K. A., McCoy, R. H., Schultze, M. O. & King, C. G. (1944). J. Nutrit. 27, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, L. L., McCay, C. M. & Maynard, L. A. (1935). Mem. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 178.Google Scholar
Marston, H. R., Quinlan-Watson, F. & Dewey, D. W. Private Communication.Google Scholar
Parkes, A. S. (1946). J. Hyg., Camb., 44, 491.Google Scholar
Sober, H. A., Mannering, G. J., Cannon, M. D., Elvehjem, C. A. & Hart, E. B. (1942). J. Nutrit. 24, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, D. W. (1942). J. Biol. Chem. 143, 679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulzen, R. & Bahrs, A. M. (1941). Proc. Amer. Physiol. Soc. 133, 500.Google Scholar
Zilva, S. S. (1936). Biochem. J. 30, 1419.Google Scholar
Zilva, S. S. (1941). Biochem. J. 35, 1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar