Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:52:37.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of incidence and geographical distribution of Chagas disease in Mexico during a decade (2007–2016)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2018

G. Ibáñez-Cervantes
Affiliation:
Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Salvador Díaz Mirón, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, 11340, México City, Mexico Hospital de la Mujer, SSA, Salvador Díaz Mirón 374, Col. Santo Tomas, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico
G. León-García
Affiliation:
Hospital de la Mujer, SSA, Salvador Díaz Mirón 374, Col. Santo Tomas, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico Centro Médico y de Investigaciones Científicas Fundación CIAM ESPERAS, A.C., Felipe Carrillo Puerto 181, Col. Popotla, 11400, Mexico City, Mexico
G. Castro-Escarpulli
Affiliation:
Departamento de Microbiología, Laboratorio de Investigación Clínica y Ambiental, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Carpio y Plan de Ayala, Col. Casco de Santo Tomás, 11340, México City, Mexico
J. Mancilla-Ramírez
Affiliation:
Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Salvador Díaz Mirón, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, 11340, México City, Mexico Hospital de la Mujer, SSA, Salvador Díaz Mirón 374, Col. Santo Tomas, 11340, Mexico City, Mexico
G. Victoria-Acosta
Affiliation:
Hospital Juárez de México, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 5160, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360, México City, Mexico
M.A. Cureño-Díaz
Affiliation:
Hospital Juárez de México, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 5160, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360, México City, Mexico
O. Sosa-Hernández
Affiliation:
Hospital Juárez de México, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 5160, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360, México City, Mexico
J.M. Bello-López*
Affiliation:
Hospital Juárez de México, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 5160, Zacatenco, Gustavo A. Madero, 07360, México City, Mexico
*
Author for correspondence: JM Bello–López, E-mail: juanmanuelbello81@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chagas disease, whose aetiological agent is the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, mainly occurs in Latin America. In order to know the epidemiology and the geographical distribution of this disease in Mexico, the present work analyses the national surveillance data (10 years) for Chagas disease issued by the General Directorate of Epidemiology (GDE). An ecological analysis of Chagas disease (2007–2016) was performed in the annual reports issued by the GDE in Mexico. The cases and incidence were classified by year, state, age group, gender and seasons. A national distribution map showing Chagas disease incidence was generated. An increase of new cases was identified throughout the country (rates from 0.37 to 0.81 per 100 000 inhabitants). Of the total cases accumulated (7388), the major cases were attributed to the states of Veracruz, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Oaxaca, Morelos and Yucatán. The analysis per age groups and gender revealed that, in most age groups, the incidence was higher in the male population. The most number of cases was identified in spring and summer; a direct relationship between the environmental temperature increase and the number of new cases was identified. The analysis showed that the rate of Chagas disease increased presumably due to state programmes; the search for new cases has expanded and we speculate that the disease is associated with occupational activities. These results summarise and recall how important it is to implement the monitoring of Chagas disease mainly in south states of the Mexican Republic in order to implement strategies to control this disease.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

Introduction

Chagas disease, whose aetiological agent is the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, mainly occurs in Latin America; it is transmitted by bug bites of the genus Triatoma, Rhodnius and Panstrongylus [Reference Carabarin-Lima1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that, around the world ≈8 million people are infected and >25 million people, predominantly in Latin America, are at risk of the disease. Each year 100 000 new cases are reported, and 10 000 patients die annually in the world [2]. The disease is one of the most important emerging health problems in Europe and in the United States of America (USA) [Reference Gascon, Bern and Pinazo3]. In this context, vector-borne diseases are one of the main causes of public-health problems in Mexico. Due to the geographic, climatic, demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the Mexican Republic there is a potential risk of its transmission [Reference Gómez-Hernández4Reference Izeta-Alberdi6]. According to the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance, Chagas disease is not classified in the 20 causes of death in the country; however, it is a disease where the incidence is mainly located in the most vulnerable states, and it requires attention for its epidemiological surveillance. Epidemiological surveillance programmes analyse information of epidemiological importance such as infectious diseases, chronic diseases, risk events and emergency situations that put public health at risk, with the aim of implementing prevention and control actions. According to the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance, the identification of new cases or deaths associated with Chagas disease is subject to mandatory notification in accordance with the Official Mexican Standard for epidemiological surveillance (NOM-017-SSA2-2012) [7]. For the definitive notification of new cases, a laboratory algorithm must be performed in diagnostic tests. The primary laboratory diagnosis of the acute and chronic phase is performed through the demonstration of trypomastigotes in peripheral blood, molecular biology tests, blood culture or xenodiagnostic and infectious serology. All cases reported to the epidemiological surveillance system are subject to monitoring, which consists of monitoring or in some cases the possible conversion of indeterminate cases. Even when new cases of Chagas disease are notifiable, the National Epidemiological Surveillance System lacks information on the evolution of the incidence considering the geographic and demographic characteristics of the Mexican population. Due to all of the above, it is necessary to have evidence, with particular attention to the study of the epidemiological behaviour of this disease through the identification of risk factors and groups, the analysis of geographical distribution and the identification of possible outbreaks or new endemic areas. In order to know the epidemiological and geographical distribution of this disease in Mexico, the present work analyses the national surveillance data during the period 2007–2016 for Chagas disease issued by the General Directorate of Epidemiology (GDE). This information will also be helpful to promote prevention and to contribute to display the disease distribution in the last 10 years (from 2007 to 2016).

Methods

Period analysed and case definition

In this work, the incidence reports and new cases of Chagas disease from 2007 to 2016 were consulted and analysed. The corresponding data for 2017 is not yet available on the consulted website. The regulatory policies in Mexico established the mandatory notification of cases of Chagas disease. The Mexican territory is geographically distributed in a complex way; it is distributed in 31 states with a huge capital. This geographical complexity promotes the permanence of Chagas disease in states considered endemic. According to the Mexican Epidemiological Surveillance System, Chagas disease is classified as infectious, mainly transmissible vector, systemic parasitic disease and its classification is based on the standards established by the Pan American Health Organization, which defines a confirmed case when presenting double reactivity by third generation immunological techniques (chronic phase) or by demonstrating trypomastigotes in blood (acute phase). All confirmed cases must be notified weekly, the notification is regulated by the Official Mexican Standard (NOM-017-SSA2-2012).

Data collection

The GDE receives the new reported cases of Chagas disease across the country on a monthly and annual basis. The collection and presentation of information was carried out under the observation of the principles of confidentiality and discretion outlined by the Federal Law of Accountability and Access to Public Government Information. The epidemiological data for the period 2007–2016 was taken from morbidity yearbooks found in www.epidemiologia.salud.gob.mx/anuario/html/anuarios.html. The data reported in this website was previously generated and analysed by the Health Department through its platform SUAVEweb (www.sinave.gob.mx). All data of new cases of Chagas disease (acute and chronic) was statistically analysed by using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) by month, year, states and demographic variables (age group and gender). Additionally, an incidence analysis of Chagas disease incidence by season was performed (per 100 000 habitants). An analysis of variance was also calculated in order to evaluate significant differences over time (P = 0.05), for data per year and month. A national distribution map showing Chagas disease incidence (per group) during the analysed period was generated. The incidence of Chagas disease during the 10 years analysed in the 32 states of the Mexican Republic was categorised into five groups (A, B, C, D and E), and was geographically mapped in the Mexican territory. Furthermore, an analysis of temporary trends of the incidence rates in the five groups previously mentioned was carried out. No ethical approval was obtained for the use of epidemiological information on Chagas disease in Mexico.

Results

Behaviour of new cases and incidence of Chagas disease

During the period studied (2007–2016), a total of 7388 cases was reported, with a median of 738.8 cases per year (ranging from 392 in 2007 to 994 in 2016 per year), reflecting in an increase of 253.57% of new cases throughout the country (Fig. 1). Of the total cases accumulated during the period analysed, 58.52% (4324 cases) was attributed to the states of Veracruz, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Oaxaca, Morelos and Yucatán. The remaining cases of Chagas disease (3064) were distributed in different proportions in the remaining 26 states of the Mexican Republic. A direct relationship between the number of new cases per year and the incidence (per 100 000 habitants) was observed. There is a significant increase in the incidence rates during the period analysed from 0.37 to 0.81. Throughout this period a median incidence of 0.62 ± 0.14 was identified.

Fig. 1. New cases of Chagas disease and incidence (per 100 000 habitants) in Mexican territory from 2007 to 2016.

Geographical distribution of Chagas disease

The distribution of the incidence of Chagas disease all over the country is mostly headed by the states in the south Pacific coast (Gulf of Tehuantepec): Chiapas, Oaxaca (group E) with incidences of 1.1–4.4. Moreover, Veracruz, Quintana Roo and Yucatán, states belonging to the Gulf Coast of Mexico, were classified into group E. Interestingly, the state of Morelos, located in the central zone of the country was located in group E with an incidence of 2.59. Most of the states located in the central region of the country that presented incidences of 0.51–1.0 were located in group D (Tamaulipas, Jalisco, Querétaro, Guerrero, Michoacán, Hidalgo and San Luis Potosí). Although the state of Tabasco is located in the southeast region of the country, it was categorised in this same group with a mean incidence of 0.56. Finally, the remaining 18 states of the Mexican Republic were located in the last categories (A, B and C), which presented mean incidences of 0.01–0.1, 0.11–0.2 and 0.21–0.5, respectively. The states located in the northern region of the country (Durango, Baja California Norte and Coahuila) had the lowest incidences. Mexico City, located in the centre of the country, had an average incidence of 0.07 (group A) (Fig. 2a). Likewise, the analysis of temporal trends of the incidence rates in the five groups previously mentioned, confirms an increase in the incidence rates, with regards to the time in the five groups analysed (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2. (a) Geographic distribution of the incidence rates (per 100 000 habitants) of Chagas disease by state in Mexican territory from 2007 to 2016. (b) Analysis of temporal trends of the incidence rates from 2007 to 2016.

Incidence of Chagas disease per age group and gender

The analysis of incidence (per 100 000 habitants) of Chagas disease by the age group showed that the male gender was the most frequent in the age groups of 20–24, 25–44, 45–49, 50–59, 60–64 and >65 years old with incidence values of 0.92 ± 0.18, 1.7 ± 0.38, 1.72 ± 0.43, 1.35 ± 0.39, 1.04 ± 0.36 and 0.9 ± 0.36, respectively. In contrast, the female gender presented incidences up to three times lower compared with the male gender in the age groups of 25–44 and 45–49 years old (0.567 vs. 1718 and 0.479 vs. 1678, respectively). The statistical analysis (P = 0.05) per age group and gender revealed that Chagas disease incidence was higher in the male population in most age groups (Fig. 3). Additionally, the maximum incidence peak was observed in the male gender in the interval between 25–44 and 45–49 years old. The mean national incidences were 0.77 and 0.36 for the male and female gender, respectively.

Fig. 3. Incidence rate (per 100 000 habitants) of Chagas disease in Mexican territory by age groups and gender from 2007 to 2016.

Seasonal distribution of Chagas disease cases

New Chagas disease cases were categorised by month/year and were analysed by distribution within the yearly seasons (winter, spring, summer and autumn). The most number of Chagas disease cases was identified in spring and summer. The values of cases were 64.3 ± 7.2, 65.3 ± 5.8, 72.7 ± 5, 75.7 ± 7, 69.7 ± 7.5 and 66 ± 11 for March, April, May, June, July and August, respectively (spring–summer). A gradual decline of cases spanning the autumn and winter seasons was identified; values of 54.2 ± 8, 58.8 ± 2.6 of cases corresponded to the months of January and February; 55.4 ± 13, 58.3 ± 9, 58.6 ± 5.6 and 44.6 ± 4.6 for September, October, November and December, respectively (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Seasonal variation of the mean of new cases of Chagas disease in the period 2007–2016 in Mexican territory.

Discussion

According to the National System of Epidemiological Surveillance, Chagas disease is not classified in the 20 causes of death in the country; however, it is a disease where the incidence is mainly located in the most vulnerable states of the country, and it requires attention for its epidemiological surveillance. In this work, it was demonstrated that Chagas disease continues to spread throughout the Mexican Republic, and it continues to be a national concern due to the increase in incidence in the last 10 years (Fig. 1). Annual increases in reported case rates may be due to the longitudinal improvements in surveillance and diagnostic capacities. As previously mentioned, the states located in the Pacific Coast (Gulf of Tehuantepec) and the Gulf Coast of Mexico were the most affected by the infection of this parasite (Fig. 2a). The analysis of the temporal trends of the incidence rates of the five groups in which the states of Mexico were divided shows a slight increase in the incidence rates with regards to the time (groups A, B, C and D), and incidences fluctuating with the incidence rates of group E (Fig. 2b). Previous studies have demonstrated that the southern states of the country have been a focal point due to the high incidence in the open population and in blood donors [Reference Segura and Escobar-Mesa8Reference Hernández-Romano11]. Furthermore, there are studies that indicate that there is no evidence of an excess risk of infection related to gender [Reference Mott12, Reference Prata13]; however, in the present work, we identified that the most vulnerable groups of infection by T. cruzi were male subjects between 25–44 and 45–49 years old (Fig. 3). It is possible that the acquisition of the disease is strongly related to occupational activities since, in the same age groups in the female gender, the incidences were significantly different (P = 0.05). It is known that agriculture is one of the main occupational activities in the population of the endemic southern states; these activities could play an important role in the incidents identified, suggesting that the possible way of infection of T. cruzi in these regions was vector transmission in the working areas. Even though these data reflect the possible acquisition of the infection through occupational activities, it is necessary to have additional demographic information to prove this hypothesis. It is important to mention that the incidence in the population group under 1 year old (0.5) was significantly higher compared with the other age groups (up to 15–19 years old), this could be related to the increase of congenital transmission in recent years [Reference Jackson14, Reference Oliveira15]. Blood transfusion and blood components can be a transmission route of Chagas disease [Reference Blumental16, Reference Ries17], which is why, serological screening of blood donors has become very significant in the last decades. Mexico, as an endemic country, recognises serological screening of blood and blood components as compulsory for T. cruzi according to the Official Mexican Standard (NOM-253-SSA1-2012) [18], ‘For the provision of human blood and its components for therapeutic purposes’. Since a large number of seropositive cases has been identified in blood banks, studies about the incidence of Chagas disease in blood donors have demonstrated that the true extent of this infection is reflected in these blood collection sites, because the incidences of seropositive donations at the national level, as well as in some specific populations and in field studies, are significantly different from the cases reported outside of these transfusion centres [Reference Mazariego-Arana19, Reference Sánchez-Guillén20]. The latter clearly shows that blood banks could be opportunity areas to detect new cases, and thus, to estimate values close to the actual incidence in the general population. Regarding the analysis of geographical and seasonal distribution of the disease, an increase from March to August is observed, reaching a maximum peak in June, months of high temperature and heavy rains in the central and south parts of the country. A sharp decrease during the cold and dry months (September–December) was observed. These results reflect a direct relationship between the environmental temperature increase by season and the number of new cases of Chagas disease. Nowadays, little is known about the influence of temperature and altitude on the incidence of Chagas disease in our country. A previous study has reported that altitude could be an important factor in the development of the rectosigmoid length in Andean patients with Chagas disease [Reference Lopes21], which suggests a direct relation between altitude and the virulence of the strain. Moreover, De Fuentes-Vicente et al. [Reference De Fuentes-Vicente22] measured in mouse models, the activity of phenoloxidase, key enzyme of defense response of triatomines, the level of parasitaemia and the number of amastigotes. In this study, it was reported that the evaluated parameters were significantly higher for infectious processes of T. cruzi from 700 m a.s.l., suggesting that this species could be more virulent than others. The influence of temperature, rain and altitude was reflected with greater incidences in the coastal states of Veracruz, Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Oaxaca and Yucatán, and in states of the central part of the country, such as Morelos which is located at 720 m a.s.l. in the southern part of the state; while, in the states with dry weather and short rainy seasons such as Durango, Chihuahua and Coahuila, incidences were lower. The National System of Epidemiological Surveillance suggests housing regulation and the use of residual insecticides, such as synthetic pyrethroids, to reduce risk and to control domestic infestation by vectors. This activity must be carried out before the rainy season, between February and May, since it is reported that, at this time of the year, the number of triatomine bites is higher, these data are consistent with the one reported in the present work. Torres-Montero et al. [Reference Torres-Montero23] have shown fluctuations in intradomiciliary infestation, with a maximum peak of presence of adult triatomines in June, month in which a greater number of cases was identified. Although, in this work, socioeconomic factors were not considered, in previous studies, these endemic areas have been identified with a high percentage of intradomiciliary and peridomiciliary infestation. This phenomenon is associated with precarious housing conditions with animal pens near the house [Reference Carbajal de la-Fuente24Reference Ramsey26]. Low incidences were reported in Mexico City and the urban area, this could be related to the habitat decrease of triatomines and better socioeconomic environments, compared with the endemic areas in the south part of the country. It has been suggested that the cases of Chagas disease in urban areas is related to migration from rural to urban areas [Reference Ramsey27, Reference Escamilla-Guerrero28]. Results reported here can help to enrich the ‘Program of Specific Action to Prevent and Control Chagas Disease 2013–2018’ carried out by the Federal Government and the development of local and state situational diagnoses to assess risks of transmission and to implement a comprehensive prevention and control programme. Among the limitations shown in the present work, there could be: limited coverage of health services in the detection of Chagas disease, cases not reported by health institutions, cases not registered due to lack of assistance from the population for diagnosis and treatment, possible detection of false positive and negative cases in the diagnosis, among others. The analysis of the Chagas disease data during a decade shows that the situation of the disease in Mexico is understated, compared with the data reported in different research articles about seroprevalence of Chagas disease. It is important to mention that a large number of patients are chronic and without symptoms, without visible development of the disease and for which, clinical, epidemiological, laboratory and cabinet follow-up should be improved. The present analysis showed that the rate of Chagas disease increased, possibly because state programmes expanded their research for new cases; presumably the disease is associated with gender occupation activities. However, it is important to mention that the GDE does not consider the cases identified in blood transfusion centres; therefore, it is suspected that the incidences reported in the present work are higher. These results summarise and recall how important it is to implement the monitoring of Chagas disease cases in all instances of health where the detection is carried out in order to determine the current situation of this disease. Therefore, blood banks are opportunity areas to establish flowcharts of confirmatory studies and references to take care of confirmed cases.

Author ORCIDs

J.M. Bello-López http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9957-3807

Acknowledgements

G.I.C., G.C.E., J.M.R. and J.M.B.L. received support ‘Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (SNI)’ from ‘Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología’ (CONACyT, Mexico). G.C.E. received support from Estímulos al Desempeño en Investigación, Comisión y Fomento de Actividades Académicas (Instituto Politécnico Nacional). The authors are also grateful to Sofia Mulia for correcting the style of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

1.Carabarin-Lima, A et al. (2013) Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) in Mexico: an update. Acta Tropica 127, 126135.Google Scholar
2.World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) Chagas Disease. Available at http://www.who.int/chagas/en/.Google Scholar
3.Gascon, J, Bern, C and Pinazo, MJ (2010) Chagas disease in Spain, the United States and other non-endemic countries. Acta Tropica 115, 2227.Google Scholar
4.Gómez-Hernández, C et al. (2008) Prevalence of triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) infected by Trypanosoma cruzi: seasonality and distribution in the Cienega region of the State of Jalisco, Mexico. Revista Da Socieda De Brasileira De Medicina Tropical 41, 257262.Google Scholar
5.Sandoval-Ruiz, CA, Guevara, R and Ibáñez-Bernal, S (2014) Household risk factors associated to infestation of Triatoma dimidiata, the Chagas disease vector in Central Region of Veracruz, Mexico. Salud Pública De México 56, 213220.Google Scholar
6.Izeta-Alberdi, A et al. (2016) Geographical, landscape and host associations of Trypanosoma cruzi DTUs and lineages. Parasites & Vectors 9, 631.Google Scholar
7.NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-017-SSA2-2012, Para la vigilancia epidemiológica (in Spanish).Google Scholar
8.Segura, EL and Escobar-Mesa, A (2005) Epidemiología de la enfermedad de Chagas en el estado de Veracruz. Salud Pública De México 47, 201208.Google Scholar
9.Cruz-Reyes, A and Pickering-López, JM (2006) Chagas disease in Mexico: an analysis of geographical distribution during the past 76 year – a review. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 101, 345354.Google Scholar
10.Ramos-Ligonio, A et al. (2010) Identification of a hyperendemic area for Trypanosoma cruzi infection in central Veracruz, Mexico. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 83, 164170.Google Scholar
11.Hernández-Romano, P et al. (2015) Prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies in blood donors from Veracruz State, Mexico. Transfusion 55, 647656.Google Scholar
12.Mott, KE et al. (1976) The epidemiology and household distribution of seroreactivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in a rural community in northeast Brazil. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 25, 552562.Google Scholar
13.Prata, A (1994) Chagas' disease. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 8, 6176.Google Scholar
14.Jackson, Y et al. (2009) Congenital transmission of Chagas disease in Latin American immigrants in Switzerland. Emerging Infectious Diseases 15, 601.Google Scholar
15.Oliveira, I et al. (2010) Congenital transmission of Chagas disease: a clinical approach. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy 8, 945956.Google Scholar
16.Blumental, S et al. (2015) First documented transmission of Trypanosoma cruzi infection through blood transfusion in a child with sickle-cell disease in Belgium. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003986.Google Scholar
17.Ries, J et al. (2016) A case of possible Chagas transmission by blood transfusion in Switzerland. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy 43, 415417.Google Scholar
18.NORMA Oficial Mexicana, NOM-253-SSA1-2012, Para la disposición de sangre humana y sus componentes con fines terapéuticos (in Spanish).Google Scholar
19.Mazariego-Arana, MA et al. (2001) Seroprevalence of human Trypanosoma cruzi infection in diferent geografic zones of Chiapas, Mexico. Revista Da Socieda De Brasileira De Medicina Tropical 34, 453458.Google Scholar
20.Sánchez-Guillén, MC et al. (2002) High prevalence anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies, among blood donors in the State of Puebla, a non-endemic area of Mexico. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 97, 947952.Google Scholar
21.Lopes, GP et al. (2013) Length and caliber of the rectosigmoid colon among patients with Chagas disease and controls from areas at different altitudes. Revista Da Socieda De Brasileira De Medicina Tropical 46, 746751.Google Scholar
22.De Fuentes-Vicente, JA et al. (2016) Relationships between altitude, triatomine (Triatoma dimidiata) immune response and virulence of Trypanosoma cruzi, the causal agent of Chagas' disease. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 31, 6371.Google Scholar
23.Torres-Montero, J et al. (2012) House infestation dynamics and feeding sources of Triatoma dimidiata in central Veracruz, Mexico. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 677682.Google Scholar
24.Carbajal de la-Fuente, AL et al. (2017) The eco-epidemiology of Triatoma infestans in the temperate Monte Desert ecoregion of mid-western Argentina. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 112, 698708.Google Scholar
25.Fung, HL et al. (2014) Domestic dog health worsens with socio-economic deprivation of their home communities. Acta Tropica 135, 6774.Google Scholar
26.Ramsey, JM et al. (2005) Risk factors associated with house infestation by the Chagas disease vector Triatoma pallidipennis in Cuernavaca metropolitan area, Mexico. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 19, 219228.Google Scholar
27.Ramsey, JM et al. (2015) Atlas of Mexican Triatominae (Reduviidae: Hemiptera) and vector transmission of Chagas disease. Memórias Do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 110, 339352.Google Scholar
28.Escamilla-Guerrero, G et al. (2012) Trypanosoma cruzi: seroprevalence detected in the blood bank of the Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Mexico City, in the period 2004 through 2009. Transfusion 52, 595600.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. New cases of Chagas disease and incidence (per 100 000 habitants) in Mexican territory from 2007 to 2016.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Geographic distribution of the incidence rates (per 100 000 habitants) of Chagas disease by state in Mexican territory from 2007 to 2016. (b) Analysis of temporal trends of the incidence rates from 2007 to 2016.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Incidence rate (per 100 000 habitants) of Chagas disease in Mexican territory by age groups and gender from 2007 to 2016.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Seasonal variation of the mean of new cases of Chagas disease in the period 2007–2016 in Mexican territory.