Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T02:59:36.654Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The epidemiological relationship between salmonella isolated from poultry meat and sewage effluents at a long-stay hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. J. Reilly
Affiliation:
Communicable Diseases (Scotland) Unit, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow
S. I. Oboegbulem
Affiliation:
Communicable Diseases (Scotland) Unit, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow
D. S. Munro
Affiliation:
Scottish Salmonella Reference Laboratory, Stobhill Hospital, Glasgow
G. I. Forbes
Affiliation:
Environmental Health (Scotland) Unit, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Between February 1988 and March 1989 chicken carcases delivered to the kitchen of a long stay psycho–geriatric hospital were screened every week for salmonella contamination. While 214 of 477 (45▒) individual carcases carried one or more salmonella types, every single consignment examined contained affected carcases.

Simultaneously sewers draining the residential accommodation and excluding kitchen effluent, were also monitored. Thirty out of 79 (38▒) of Moore's swabs were positive for salmonella. There was a statistically significant association between the salmonella types isolated from chicken and those isolated from sewers the following week.

Following a change in kitchen policy to order only cooked chicken there was a significant reduction in the isolation of salmonella from the sewers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

1.MeCoy, JM. Trends in salmonella food poisoning in England and Wales 1941–1972. J Hyg 1975; 74: 271–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Galbraith, NS. Surveillance of foodborne infections in England and Wales. Chem Industry 1985; 5: 148–52.Google Scholar
3.Cowden, JM, Lynch, D, Joseph, CA, O'Mahony, M, Mawer, SL, Rowe, B, Bartlett, CL. Case-control study of infections with S. enteritidis PT4 in England. Brit Med J 1989; 299: 771–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Humphrey, TJ, Rowe, B, Mead, GC. Special article: Poultry meat as a source of human salmonellosis in England and Wales. Epidemiol Infect 1988; 100: 175–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Reilly, WJ, Forbes, GI, Sharp, JCM, Oboegbulem, SI, Collier, PW, Paterson, GM. Poultryborne salmonellosis in Scotland. Epidemiol Infect 1988; 101: 115–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Chalker, RB, Blaser, MJ, A review of human salmonellosis. III Magnitude of salmonella infection in the United States. Rev Infect Dis 1988; 10: 11124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Buchwald, DS, Blaser, MJ. A review of human salmonellosis. II Duration of excretion following infection with non-typhoid salmonella. Rev Infect Dis 1984; 6: 345–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sharp, JCM. Convalescent excretion of salmonella and shigella. Health Bull 1970; 28: 14.Google Scholar
9.Cox, NA, Thomas, JE, Bailey, JS. Sampling of broiler carcases with low volume water rinse. Poultry Sci 1981; 60: 768–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Moore, B, Perry, EL, Chard, ST. A survey by the sewer swab method of latent enteric infection in an urban area. J Hyg 1952; 50: 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Harvey, RWS, Price, TH. Sewer drain swabbing as a means of investigating salmonellosis. J Hyg 1970; 68: 611–23.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Fricker, CR, Girdwood, RWA, Munro, D.. A comparison of enrichment media for isolation of salmonella from seagull cloacal swab. J Hyg 1983; 91: 53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Edwards, P, Erwing, W.. Identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Burgers Publishing Co., 1972.Google Scholar
14.Rowe, B, Hall, MLM. Kauffman-White scheme. Division of Enteric Pathogens. London: Public Health Laboratory, 1980.Google Scholar
15.Kauffmann, F.. Serological diagnosis of salmonella species. Copenhagan: Munkagard, 1982.Google Scholar
16.Roberts, D.. Observations on procedures for thawing and spit-roasting frozen dressed chickens, and post-cooking care and storage; with particular reference to food poisoning bacteria. J Hyg 1972; 70: 565–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Watson, WA. Salmonella infections and meat hygiene: poultry meat. Vet Rec 1975: 96: 351–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Green, SS, Moore, AB, Johnston, RW, Uhler, R, Chiu, J.. The incidence of salmonella serotypes in young whole chicken carcases in 1979 compared with 1967. Poultry Sci 1982; 61: 288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.D'Aoust, JY, Stotland, P, Boville, A. Sampling methods for detection of salmonella in raw chicken carcases. J Food Sci 1982; 47: 1643–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Gilbert, RJ, Roberts, D.. Salmonella: food hygiene aspects of laboratory methods. PHLS Microbiol Digest 1986; 3: 911.Google Scholar
21.Anonymous. Salmonella in eggs. Public Health Laboratory Service evidence to Agriculture Committee. PHLS Microbiol Digest 1989; 6: 19.Google Scholar
22.Report (1986). The report of the committee of inquiry into an outbreak of food poisoning at Stanley Royd Hospital, London: HMSO. Cmnd 9716.Google Scholar
23.Harvey, RWS, Price, TH. Salmonellas in sewage: a study in latent human infection. J Hyg 1969; 67: 517–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Harvey, RWS, Price, TH. Isolation of salmonella. Public Health Laboratory Service Monograph Series 1984; 8: 25.Google Scholar
25.Harvey, RWS, Price, TH. Salmonella isolations from hospital areas. J Hyg 1979; 83: 461–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Mead, GC. Food poisoning salmonellas in the poultry meat industry. Brit Food J 1990; 92: 32–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar