Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:22:06.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enzyme immunoassay of the antibody response to Brucella and Yersinia enterocolitica 09 infections in humans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

A. A. Lindberg ,
S. Hæggman ,
K. Karlson ,
H. E. Carlsson  and
N. S. Mair
A. A. Lindberg
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, National Bacteriological Laboratory, S–105 21 Stockholm, Sweden
S. Hæggman
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, National Bacteriological Laboratory, S–105 21 Stockholm, Sweden
K. Karlson
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, National Bacteriological Laboratory, S–105 21 Stockholm, Sweden
H. E. Carlsson
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, National Bacteriological Laboratory, S–105 21 Stockholm, Sweden
N. S. Mair
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An enzyme immunoassay, with phenol–water-extracted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Brucella abortus as antigen, was used to detect the class-specific antibody response in sera from 173 patients with B. abortus, B. melitensis or B. suis infection. Sera from 30 patients with salmonellosis, yersiniosis or tularaemia and from 25 healthy individuals served as controls. The B. abortus LPS antigen permitted a safe diagnosis of acute and chronic brucellosis with high IgM and rising IgG titres in sera collected in the acute stage of the disease, and with elevated IgG titres only in the chronic stage. The B. abortus LPS antigen also permitted a specific diagnosis with the exception of the high titres estimated in sera from patients with Yersinia enterocolitica 09 infection. The problem with that well-known reciprocal cross-reactivity was overcome by using two additional antigens: Y. enterocolitica 09 native and periodate oxidized and borohydride reduced LPS preparations. In sera from patients with brucellosis high titres were estimated against all three antigens, whereas in sera from patients with yersiniosis caused by serotype 09 high titres were measurable only with the B. abortus and the Y. enterocolitica native LPS antigens. These data suggest that the B. abortus and Y. enterocolitica 09 LPS share one antigenic determinant resistant to periodate oxidation and borohydride reduction, and that in addition the Y. enterocolitica 09 LPS has a determinant which is sensitive to periodate oxidation and borohydride reduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 88 , Issue 2 , April 1982 , pp. 295 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

REFERENCES

Ahvonen, P., Jansson, E. & Aho, K. (1969). Marked cross-agglutination between Brucellae and a subtype of Yersinia enterocolitica. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 75, 291–295.Google Scholar
Berman, D. T., Wilson, B. L., Moreno, E., Angus, R. D. & Jones, L. M. (1980). Characterization of Brucella abortus soluble antigen employed in immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 11, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, H. E., Hurvell, B. & Lindberg, A. A. (1976). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. (ELISA) for titration of antibodies against Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica C 84, 168–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, H. E. & Lindberg, A. A. (1978). Application of enzyme immunoassays for diagnosis of bacterial and mycotic infections. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology 8, (suppl. 7), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, H. E., Lindberg, A. A. & Hammarström, S. (1972). Titration of antibodies to Salmonella O-antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infection and Immunity 6, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlsson, H. E., Lindberg, A. A., Lindberg, G., Hederstedt, B., Karlsson, K. A. & Agell, B. O. (1979). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for immunological diagnosis of human tularemia. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 10, 615–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engvall, E. & Perlmann, P. (1971). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8, 871–874.Google ScholarPubMed
Engvall, E. & Perlmann, P. (1972). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Elisa. III. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled antiimmunoglobulin in antigen coated tubes. Journal of Immunology 109, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO/WHO expert committee on brucellosis. Fifth report (1971). World Health Organization Technical Report Series No. 464 and FAO Agricultural Studies No. 85. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Hammarström, S., Engvall, E., Johansson, B. G., Svensson, S., Sundblad, G. & Goldstein, I. J. (1975). Nature of the tumor associated determinant(s) of carcino embryonic antigen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 72, 1528–1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurvell, B. & Lindberg, A. A. (1973). Serological cross-reactions between different Brucella species and Yersinia enterocolitica. Immunochemical studies on phenol-water extracted lipopolysaccharides from Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica type IX. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica B 81, 113–119.Google ScholarPubMed
Hurvell, B., Lindberg, A. A. & Carlsson, H. E. (1979). Differentiation of antibodies against Brucella abortus and Yersinia by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Contributions to Microbiology and Immunology 5, 73–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Karlsson, K., Carlsson, H. E., Neringer, R. & Lindberg, A. A. (1980). Application and usefulness of enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of Salmonella typhimurium infection. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 12, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, W. R., McCaughey, W. J., Coghlan, J. D., Payne, D. J. H., Quaife, R. A., Robertson, L. & Farrell, I. D. (1968). Techniques and interpretations in the serological diagnosis of brucella in man. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamb, V. L., Jones, L. M., Schurig, G. G. & Berman, D. T. (1979). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bovine immunoglobulin subclass-specific response to Brucella abortus lipopolysaccharides. Infection and Immunity 26, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, A. A. & Holme, T. (1972). Evaluation of some extraction methods for the preparation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides for structural analysis. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica B 80, 751–759.Google ScholarPubMed
Magee, J. T. (1980). An enzyme-labelled immunosorbent assay for Brucella abortus antibodies. Journal of Medical Microbiology 13, 167–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, K. R., Ricciardi, I. D. & Tizard, I. R. (1980). Indirect hemagglutination employing Enterobacterial common antigen and Yersinia somatic antigen: a technique to differentiate brucellosis from infections involving cross-reacting Yersinia enterocolitica. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 11, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niléhn, B. (1969). Studies on Yersinia enterocolitica growth on various solid media at 37 °C and 25 °C. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 71, 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrat, D., Neilsen, K. H., White, R. G. & Payne, D. J. H. (1977). Radioimmunoassay of IgM, IgG and IgA brucella antibodies. Lancet 1, 1075–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar