Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T20:21:27.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The detection of cholera vibrios in Calcutta waters: the River Hooghly and canals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. H. Abou-Gareeb
A. H. Abou-Gareeb
Affiliation:
The Epidemiology Department, The High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria, Egypt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Before undertaking a bacteriological survey of the waters of the Hooghly River and the associated canals a detailed epidemiological study over the past 20 years of cholera, as it affected the individual administrative wards of Calcutta, was undertaken. Sampling points were selected in accordance with the results of this study. Samples of water from the various points were collected at intervals extending from December 1958 to August 1959 in 2½–5 l. amounts. The whole sample in each case was filtered through special filter pads. The pads were first cultured in an enrichment medium from which plate cultures were subsequently made for colony isolation, serological and biochemical examination.

2. The sampling points on the canals were all adjacent to areas where the local endemicity was judged to be high; other points were by bathing ghats, etc. A total of eighty-nine samples covering all the sampling points were examined and Vibrio cholerae were isolated from twelve of these samples, eight of which came from twenty-six samples collected from two sampling points on the Chetla and Circular Canals, respectively.

3. The positive isolations were spread fairly evenly over the whole period of the study which covered both epidemic and non-epidemic periods including the monsoon. Although the incidence of cholera in Calcutta may fall to a low level during non-epidemic periods cases continue to occur throughout the year and the relationship of the maintenance of the infection in the city to the continuous potential infectivity of the open natural waters of Calcutta is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1960 , pp. 21 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

References

REFERENCES

Abou-Gareeb, A. H. (1959 a). Some epidemiological observations on cholera in Kathmandu, Nepal. Indian J. publ. Hlth, 3, 20.Google Scholar
Abou-Gareeb, A. H. (1959 b). Cholera vibrios in Calcutta mosque water. J. trop. Med. (Hyg.), 62, 195.Google ScholarPubMed
Annual Reports (1939–1951). Annual Reports of the Calcutta Medical Officer. Calcutta: Govermnent Press.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (1884). Die Konferenz zur Erörterung der Cholerafrage. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 10, 499, 519.Google Scholar
Korobov, L. I. & Kolesnikova, L. I. (1956). On the problem of the mutability of water vibrios. Coll. Pap., Anti-Pl. Inst. Rostov/Don, 11, 25.Google Scholar
Krishnan, K. V. (1953). Investigation of the probable role of Hilsa fish in maintaining cholera endemicity in India. Technical Report of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Indian Council of Medical Research for the year 1952. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Lahiri, M. N. (1954). Investigation on cholera endemicity with special reference to Hilsa and other estuarine fishes. Technical Report of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Indian Council of Medical Research for the year 1953. New Delhi.Google Scholar
Metchnikoff, E. (1893). Recherches sur le cholera et les vibrions. 2e mémoire. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 7, 562.Google Scholar
Panja, G. & Ghosh, S. K. (1947). Isolation of cholera vibrios from Hooghly river water at Calcutta. Indian J. med. Res. 35, 1.Google Scholar
Pillay, T. V. R., Dutta, S. N. & Rajgopal, S. (1954). The vibrio flora of fishes, water and silt in the Hooghly estuary with reference to cholera endemicity. Alumni Ass. Bull. All-India Inst. Hyg. publ. Hlth, 1, 27.Google Scholar
Pollitzer, R. & Burrows, W. (1955). Cholera studies. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 12, 1008.Google ScholarPubMed
Pollitzer, R. (1957). Cholera studies. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 16, 783.Google Scholar
Roy, D. K. (1959). A note on the incidence of cholera in the Chetla area for the period between November 1957 to June 30, 1958. Indian J. publ. Hlth, 3, 33.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. & Ahuja, M. L. (1938). Incidence and characters of vibrios in waters in Northern India. Indian J. med. Res. 36, 1.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, K. V. (1940). Madras cholera inquiry. Report of the King Inst. Guindy, Madras, Oct. 1939–Sept. 1940, p. 32.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, K. V. (1941). Madras cholera inquiry. Report of the King Inst. Guindy, Madras, Oct. 1940–Sept. 1941, p. 23.Google Scholar
Venkatraman, K. V., Krishnaswami, A. K. & Ramkrishnan, C. S. (1941). Occurrence of Vibrio El Tor in natural sources of water in the absence of cholera. Indian J. med. Res. 29, 419.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1950). Joint OIHP/WHO Study-group on Cholera. Tech. Rep. Ser. Wld Hlth Org. 18, 13.Google Scholar