Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T13:10:05.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of Bordetella pertussis antibodiesin human sera by complement-fixation and immunofluorescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. M. Patricia Bradstreet
Affiliation:
The Standards Laboratory for Serological Reagents, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, NW9 5HT
Agnes J. Tannahill
Affiliation:
The Standards Laboratory for Serological Reagents, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, NW9 5HT
Joan M. B. Edwards
Affiliation:
The Standards Laboratory for Serological Reagents, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, NW9 5HT
P. F. Benson
Affiliation:
Guy's Hospital, London, S.E. 1
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The complement-fixation test, as commonly used in the diagnosis of viral infections, was studied for its possible application to the diagnosis of whooping cough and the detection of antibody following pertussis vaccination. The results were compared with those obtained in parallel immunofluorescence tests. CFTs were performed on sera from 41 patients with whooping cough (Bordetella pertussis isolated), 125 vaccinated persons, and 618 controls; parallel tests by IP were made on sera from 24 cases of whooping cough, 36 vaccinated persons and 37 controls. Results of both tests correlated closely and showed that titres of diagnostic significance were seldom found in control sera. They also showed that, in patients suffering from whooping cough, antibody in a single specimen or a rise in antibody between paired sera was almost always demonstrated. Titres in general were lower in infants less than 6 months of age. IgG antibodies were involved in both tests. Although the number of sera tested was small both tests appear to be reliable as means of demonstrating the presence of antibody formed during the course of infection and after vaccination.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

References

REFERENCES

Bordet, J. & Gengou, O. (1906). Le microbe de la coqueluche. Annales de l' Institut Pasteur, Paris 20, 731.Google Scholar
Bordet, J. & Gengou, O. (1907). Note complementaire sur le microbe de la coqueluche. Annales de l' Institut Pasteur, Paris 21, 720.Google Scholar
Bradstreet, C. M. P. & Taylor, C. E. D. (1962). Technique of complement-fixation test applicable to the diagnosis of virus diseases. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 21, 96.Google Scholar
Combined Scottish Study (1970). Diagnosis of Whooping Cough: comparison of serological tests with isolation of Bordetella pertussis. British Medical Journal iv, 637.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. M. B., Tannahill, A. J. & Bradstreet, C. M. P. (1970). Comparison of the indirect fluorescent antibody test with agglutination, complement-fixation, and Coombs tests for Brucella antibody. Journal of Clinical Pathology 23, 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D. G. & Maitland, H. B. (1939). The toxin of Br. bronchiseptica and the relationship of this organism to H. pertussis. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 48, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillemer, L., Blum, L. & Lepow, I. H. (1954). Protective antigen of Haemophilus pertussis. Lancet i, 1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report (1959). Vaccination against Whooping-Cough. British Medical Journal i, 994.Google Scholar
Weichsel, M. & Douglas, H. S. (1937). Complement-fixation tests in pertussis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 16, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. S. & Miles, A. A. (1964). Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology and Immunology, 5th edn., vol. 2, p. 2011. London: Arnold.Google Scholar