Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:40:19.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The behaviour of f2 coliphage in activated sludge treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. A. Balluz ,
M. Butler  and
H. H. Jones
S. A. Balluz
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey
M. Butler
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey
H. H. Jones
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A model activated sludge treatment plant was used which was functionally very similar to a full-scale plant. It was inoculated with f2 coliphage and the titres of virus in the influent, the mixed liquor and the effluent were monitored regularly. The distribution of the virus in the solids and liquid fractions of the mixed liquor was in the ratio of 18:82 and 20–4 % of the influent virus was recovered in the effluent. After inoculation was stopped the titre of virus in the solids fraction of the mixed liquor remained high and unaltered for up to 70 h, whereas the value for effluent reverted to the low background titre originally present. These results are discussed in relation to those reported for poliovirus and it is concluded that f2 coliphage is not a suitable model for studies of the behaviour of human enteroviruses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 237 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Adams, M. H. (1959). Bacteriophages. New York: Interscience Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balluz, S. A., Jones, H. H. & Butler, M. (1977). The persistence of poliovirus in activated sludge treatment. Journal of Hygiene 78, 165–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buras, N. & Kott, Y. (1966). Bacteriophage as an indicator for the estimation of waterpollution. Israel Journal of Medicine 2, 660–61.Google Scholar
Carstens, E. M. J., Coetzee, O. J., Malherbe, H. H. & Harwin, R. H. (1965). Bacteriophage of Serratia marcescens as an index of human virus survival during sewage purification. CSIR (South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) Report. Research 241, 1–17.Google Scholar
Curds, C. R. & Fey, G. J. (1969). The effect of ciliated protozoa on the fate of E. coli in the activated sludge process. Water Research 3, 853–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kott, Y., Roze, N., Sperber, S. & Betzer, N. (1974). Bacteriophages as viral pollution indicators. Water Research 8, 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, T. & Zinder, N. D. (1961). A bacteriophage containing RNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 47, 282–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naparstek, J. D. (1973). Virus removal by activated sludge using an f2 coliphage model. Sc.M. thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Naparstek, J. D., Olivieri, V. P., Kawata, K. & Sherman, V. R. (1976). Virus removal in an activated sludge plant. Water and Sewage Works, Reference Number R16–20.Google Scholar
Ranganatham, K. R., Malina, J. F. Jr, Sagik, B. P. & Moore, B. D. (1974). The inactivation of poliovirus, bacteriophage of E. coli B and enteric bacteria in biological waste treatment systems. Technical Report to National Science Foundation, Research Applied to National Needs. University of Texas, Center for Research in Water Resources, CRWR – 111, EHE – 74–03, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Safferman, R. S. & Morris, M. E. (1976). Assessment of virus removal by a multi-stage activated-sludge process. Water Research 10, 413–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, V. R., Kawata, K., Olivieri, V. P. & Naparstek, J. D. (1975). Virus removals in trickling filter plants. Water and Sewage Works. Reference number R36-R44.Google Scholar