Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T09:37:20.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agglutination tests in the diagnosis of enteric fever in the inoculated

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. F. Wilson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Early blood culture is the best method of laboratory diagnosis in the inoculated case of enteric fever, but agglutination tests may give useful information.

2. In inoculated cases of enteric fever O and Vi agglutinins may be absent or present only at low titres. Steadily rising titres are not the rule and the titres more often fluctuate.

3. Complete agglutination at titres over 1: 80 for TO, over 1: 40 for AO, or over 1: 10 for Vi is suggestive but not diagnostic of an active infection.

4. Non-specific stimulation of the O and Vi agglutinins in the inoculated affects mainly the lower range of titres which are probably of little diagnostic significance.

5. Previous inoculations increase the proportion of people with residual O agglutinins within 6 months of the last inoculation but do not affect the Vi agglutinins.

6. Vi agglutinins may be present in normal inoculated persons who are not carriers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1945 , pp. 129 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1945

References

REFERENCES

Almon, L., Read, J. & Stoval, W. D. (1937). Amer. J. Publ. Hlth, 27, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almon, L. & Stoval, W. D. (1940). J. Lab. Clin. Med. 25, 844.Google Scholar
Beattie, C. P. & Elliot, J. S. (1937). J. Hyg., Camb., 37, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensted, H. J. (1937). J. R. Army Med. Cps, 68, 1.Google Scholar
Bensted, H. J. (1940). J. R. Army Med. Cps, 74, 19.Google Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. S. (1938). Brit. Med. J. 2, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, S. S., Speechly, C. G. J. & Singh, M. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 663.Google Scholar
Boyd, J. S. K. (1939). Brit. Med. J. 2, 902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlberg, G. (1940). Statistical Methods for Medical and Biological Students. London.Google Scholar
Damon, S. R. (1937). Amer. J. Hyg. 26, 40.Google Scholar
Dreyer, G. & Inman, A. C. (1917). Lancet, 1, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, G. & Walker, E. W. A. (1916). Lancet, 2, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyer, G., Walker, E. W. A. & Gibson, A. G. (1915). Lancet, 1, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulaney, A. D. & Wikle, W. T. (1933). J. Immunol. 24, 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, C. P. (1940). Amer. J. Hyg. B, 31, 8.Google Scholar
Felix, A. (1924). J. Immunol. 9, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1938). Lancet, 2, 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A. (1941). Brit. Med. J. 1, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A., Krikorian, K. S. & Reitler, R. (1935). J. Hyg., Camb., 35, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, A., Rainsford, S. G. & Stokes, E. J. (1941). Brit. Med. J. 1, 434.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G. (1933). J. Hyg., Camb., 33, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hac, L. R., Flynn, C. S. & Perry, C. A. (1939). J. Lab. Clin. Med. 24, 567.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. H. (1939). Circular issued by Head-quarters, Northern Command, India, 08 1939.Google Scholar
Horgan, E. S. & Drysdale, E. (1940). Lancet, 1, 1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson-Bahr, P. H. (1940). Manson's Tropical Diseases, 11th ed. London.Google Scholar
Perry, H. M. (1918). Lancet, 1, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pijper, A. & Crocker, C. G. (1939). S. Afr. Med. J. 13, 255.Google Scholar
Seshadrinathan, N. & Pai, M. N. (1940). Ind. Med. Gaz. 85, 735.Google Scholar
Scott, W. D. (1943). J. R. Nav. Med. Serv. 29, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. & Wilson, G. S. (1936). The Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar