Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T12:36:39.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: The Geography of New York State's Brownfield Cleanup Program: Population and Land Value Characteristics of Areas Surrounding New York City Properties Enrolled in New York State's Brownfield Cleanup Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2009

Michael Porter
Michael Porter*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York City, New York
*
Address correspondence to: Michael Porter, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York City, NY 10016; (phone) 646-279-3397; (email) mporter@gc.cuny.edu
Get access

Abstract

Over the past 30 years nearly every state has implemented a voluntary compliance program (VCP) to encourage development of lightly contaminated and abandoned properties also known as brownfields. Analyses of these policies consists primarily of either case studies or tabulations of site-specific characteristics such as the past, current, and future use of sites enrolled in programs. Often ignored in these analyses are the characteristics of areas surrounding these properties. This oversight is particularly problematic, because many commentators argue that VCPs encourage development in neighborhoods with strong real estate markets and predominantly White and wealthy residents while having little impact on poorer neighborhoods with primarily Black and Hispanic residents where brownfields tend to cluster. To date, however, little empirical research supports this claim. This article addresses this need by using tax-lot-level data in conjunction with data from the United States Decennial Census to examine the characteristics of the neighborhoods surrounding New York City properties enrolled in New York State's VCP: the Brownfield Cleanup Program (BCP). I conclude that, for the city in general, even when controlling for the spatial distribution of brownfield sites, properties enrolled in the BCP are disproportionately located in neighborhoods with wealthier and Whiter residents and high property values. These results, however, obscure significant variability because projects cluster in a range of communities.

Environmental Practice 11:245–255 (2009)

Type
FEATURES
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 245 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, R. 1997. Superfund and the Evolution of Brownfields. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 21:265–292.Google Scholar
Alberini, A., Longo, A., Tonin, S., Trombetta, F., and Turvani, M.. 2005. The Role of Liability, Regulation and Economic Incentives in Brownfield Remediation and Redevelopment: Evidence from Surveys of Developers. Regional Science and Urban Economics 35(4):327–351.Google Scholar
Alberini, A., and Segerson, K.. 2002. Assessing Voluntary Programs to Improve Environmental Quality. Environmental and Resource Economics 22:157–184.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2008. Lawmakers Reach Agreement on Brownfields. New York Sun, June 24, 2008.Google Scholar
Banzhaf, S., and Walsh, R.. 2004. Testing for Environmental Gentrification: Migratory Responses to Changes in Environmental Quality. Paper read at the American Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, at Estes Park, CO, 4 pp. Available at http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/events/flyers/eb_051110_Walsh_Abstract.pdf.Google Scholar
Bartsch, C., Collaton, E., and Pepper, E.. 1996. Coming Clean for Economic Development: A Resource Book on Environmental Cleanup and Economic Development. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC, 166 pp.Google Scholar
Besag, J., and Diggle, P.J.. 1977. Simple Monte Carlo Tests for Spatial Pattern. Applied Statistics 26(3):327–333.Google Scholar
Bloomberg, M. 2008. PlaNYC: A Greener, Greater New York. City of New York.Google Scholar
Brown, J. 2008. Complaint, United States of America vs Anthony Seminerio. US District Court, Southern District of New York, New York City.Google Scholar
Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A.S., and Charlton, M.. 1998. Geographically Weighted Regression-Modelling Spatial Non-stationarity. The Statistician 47(3):431–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Health Environment andJustice, Citizens' Environmental Coalition, York, Environmental Advocates of New, Group, New York Public Interest Research, Chapter, and Sierra Club–Atlantic. 2007. Cleaning Up: Fixing New York's Broken Brownfield Cleanup Program. New York, 17 pp. Available at New York Public Interest Research Group, http://www.nypirg.org/ENVIRO/brownfields/CleaningUpNY'sBCP9-25-07.pdf.Google Scholar
Collaton, E., and Bartsch, C.. 1996. Industrial Site Reuse and Urban Redevelopment: An Overview. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2(3):17–61.Google Scholar
Council for Urban Economic Development (CUED). 1999. Brownfields Redevelopment: Performance Evaluation. CUED, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 1999. Working Toward a Common Goal? Three Case Studies of Brownfields Redevelopment in Environmental Justice Communities. Stanford Environmental Law Review 18(2):285–329.Google Scholar
De Sousa, C. 2005. Policy Performance and Brownfield Redevelopment in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Professional Geographer 57(2):312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiNapoli, T. 2008. Overview of the New York State Brownfield Cleanup Program. Office of the New York State Comptroller, Albany, NY, 20 pp. Available at http://www.osc.state.ny.us/reports/environmental/brownfields08.pdf.Google Scholar
Eisen, J. 1996. Brownfields of Dreams? Challenges and Limits of Voluntary Cleanup Programs and Incentives. University of Illinois Law Review 94(4):833–1039.Google Scholar
Eisen, J. 2007. Brownfields at 20: A Critical Reevaluation. Fordham Urban Law Journal 34(2):721–756.Google Scholar
Environmental New Service. 2003. New York Funds Brownfields, Superfund Remediation. Available at http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/sep2003/2003-09-23-01.asp.Google Scholar
Essoka, J. 2003. Brownfields Revitalization Projects: Displacement of the Dispossessed (unpublished PhD dissertation). Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 200 pp.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A.S. 1997. Trends in Quantitative Methods I: Stressing the Local. Progress in Human Geography 21(1):88–96.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A.S. 2000. Context-Dependent Spatial Analysis: A Role for GIS? Journal of Geographical Systems 2(1):71–76.Google Scholar
Gardner, S. 2001. Green Visions for Brownfields: The Politics of Site Remediation and Redevelopment in Four New Jersey Cities (unpublished PhD dissertation). City University of New York, 335 pp.Google Scholar
Geller, A.L. 2003. Smart Growth: A Prescription for Livable Cities. American Journal of Public Health 93(9):1410–1415.Google Scholar
Geltman, E.G. 2000. Recycling Land: Understanding the Legal Landscape of Brownfield Development. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 392 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getis, A., and Ord, J.. 1992. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis 24(3):189–206.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M., Craighill, P., Mayer, H., Zukin, C., and Wells, J.. 2001. Brownfield Redevelopment and Affordable Housing: A Case Study of New Jersey. Housing Policy Debate 12(3):515–540.Google Scholar
Greenberg, M., Lee, C., and Powers, C.. 1998. Public Health and Brownfields: Reviving the Past to Protect the Future. American Journal of Public Health 88(12):1759–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, M., Lowrie, K., Mayer, H., Miller, K.T., and Solitare, L.. 2001. Brownfield Redevelopment as a Smart Growth Option in the United States. Environmentalist 21(2):129–143.Google Scholar
Heberle, L., and Wernstedt, K.. 2006. Understanding Brownfields Regeneration in the US. Local Environment 11(5):479–497.Google Scholar
Jackson, T. 2005. Groundwater Contamination and Real Estate Investment Risk. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education 8(1):115–131.Google Scholar
Keenan, J. 2005. The Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2002: Promoting a Multi-jurisdictional Policy. Pace Environmental Law Review 22:39–53.Google Scholar
Lange, D., and McNeil, S.. 2004. Clean It and They Will Come? Defining Successful Brownfield Development. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 130(2):101–108.Google Scholar
Leigh, N.G. 2000. Promoting More Equitable Brownfield Redevelopment: Promising Approaches for Land Banks and Other Community Land Development Entities. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper. Cambridge, MA, 50 pp. Available at Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, http://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/84_Promoting-More-Equitable-Brownfield-Redevelopment.Google Scholar
Litt, J., and Burke, T.. 2002. Uncovering the Historic Environmental Hazards of Urban Brownfields. Journal of Urban Health 79(4):464–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mank, B. 2000. Reforming State Brownfield Programs to Comply with Title VI. Harvard Environmental Law Review 24(1):115–187.Google Scholar
McCarthy, L. 2002. The Brownfield Dual Land-Use Policy Challenge: Reducing Barriers to Private Redevelopment while Connecting Reuse to Broader Community Goals. Land Use Policy 19(4):287–296.Google Scholar
McMorrow, A.P. 2004. CERCLA Liability Redefined: An Analysis of the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act and Its Impact on State Voluntary Cleanup Programs. Georgia State University Law Review 20(4):1087–1127.Google Scholar
Mennis, J.L., and Jordan, L.. 2005. The Distribution of Environmental Equity: Exploring Spatial Nonstationarity in Multivariate Models of Air Toxic Releases. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(2):249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, P. 1998. Accounting for Differential Neighborhood Economic Development Impacts in Site-Specific or Area-Based Approaches to Urban Brownfield Regeneration. Working Paper. Center for Environmental Policy and Management, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 15 pp. Available at http://cepm.louisville.edu/Pubs_WPapers/PDF_Docs/site-vs-area.pdf (accessed April 25, 2006).Google Scholar
Meyer, P., Williams, R., and Yount, K.. 1995. Contaminated Land, Reclamation, Redevelopment and Reuse in the United States and the European Union. Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VT, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Mills, C.F. 2006. Global RBCA: Its Implementation, Foundation in Risk-Based Theory, and Implications. Florida State University College of Law 22(1):101–138. Available at http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/landuse/vol22_1/Mills.pdf (accessed December 8, 2007).Google Scholar
Mueller, G.R. 2005. Brownfields Capital: Unlocking Value in Environmental Redevelopment. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management 11(1):81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulligan, C.N., Yong, R.N., and Gibbs, B.F.. 2001. Remediation Technologies for Metal-Contaminated Soils and Groundwater: An Evaluation. Engineering Geology 60:193–207.Google Scholar
Newell, C.J., and Connor, J.A.. 1996. The ASTM Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA) Program. ASTM, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
New York City Department of City Planning (DOCP). 2003. The Primary Land Use Tax Lot Output (PLUTO). DOCP, New York.Google Scholar
New York City Department of City Planning (DOCP). 2008. Address Translator. DOCP, New York. Available at http://gis.nyc.gov/dcp/at/f1.jsp.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 2002. Voluntary Program Guide. DEC, Albany, NY, 50 pp.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 2004. Brownfield Cleanup Program Guide. DEC, Albany, NY, 59 pp.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 2008. Environmental Site Remediation Database. DEC, Albany, NY. Available at http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternal/index.cfm?pageid=3 (accessed January 25, 2009).Google Scholar
Opper, R. 2005. The Brownfields Manifesto. Urban Lawyer 37(1):163–190.Google Scholar
Page, G.W., and Berger, R.S.. 2005. Property Characteristics of Contaminated Land in Environmental Cleanup Programs in New York State. Public Works Management and Policy 10(2):157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, G.W., and Rabinowitz, H.. 1994. Potential for Redevelopment of Contaminated Brownfield Sites. Economic Development Quarterly 8(4):353–363.Google Scholar
Paull, E. 2008. The Environmental and Economic Impacts of Brownfield Redevelopment. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC, 53 pp.Google Scholar
Pepper, E. 1997. Lessons from the Field: Unlocking Economic Potential with an Environmental Key. Northeast-Midwest Institute, Washington, DC, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Reddy, K., Adams, J., and Richardson, C.. 1999. Potential Technologies for Remediation of Brownfields. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management 3(2):61–68.Google Scholar
Sheppard, E., Leitner, H., McMaster, R., and Tian, H.. 1999. GIS-Based Measures of Environmental Equity: Exploring Their Sensitivity and Significance. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 9(1):18–28.Google ScholarPubMed
United Church of Christ. 1987. Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites. United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, New York, 69 pp. Available at http://www.ucc.org/about-us/archives/pdfs/toxwrace87.pdf.Google Scholar
United States Conference of Mayors. 2006. Recycling America's Land: A National Report on Brownfields Redevelopment, volume 4. US Conference of Mayors, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.usmayors.org/74thAnnualMeeting/brownfieldsreport_060506.pdf (accessed October 2, 2008).Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). 2009. Brownfields and Land Revitalization. US EPA, Washington, DC. Available at http://earth1.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/index.html (accessed September 24, 2009).Google Scholar
Van Hook, D.E. 2000. Area-wide Brownfields Planning, Remediation and Development. Fordham Environmental Law Journal 11:743–772.Google Scholar
VanLandingham, H.W., and Meyer, P.. 2002. Public Strategies for Cost-Effective Community Brownfield Redevelopment: Practice Guide #1. Southeast Regional Environmental Finance Center (SREF), Center for Environmental Policy and Management, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 26 pp. Available at http://cepm.louisville.edu/Pubs_WPapers/practiceguides/PG1.pdf (accessed October 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Weiser, B., and Hakim, D.. 2008. Queens Assemblyman “Put His Office Up for Sale,” Prosecutors Say. New York Times, September 11, 2008.Google Scholar
Wernstedt, K., and Hanson, J.. 2009. Community Revitalization through Areawide Brownfield Regeneration, Community Land Trusts, and Progressive Finance. Environmental Practice 11(03):134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wernstedt, K., Heberle, L., Alberini, A., and Meyer, P.. 2004. The Brownfields Phenomenon: Much Ado about Something or the Timing of the Shrewd? Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 27 pp. Available at http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-04-46.pdf.Google Scholar
Wernstedt, K., Hersh, R., and Probst, K.. 1999. Grounding Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A Promising Remedy? Land Use Policy 16(1):45–55.Google Scholar
Winson-Geidman, K., Simons, R.A., and Pendergrass, J.. 2004. Tracking Remediation and Redevelopment Trends of Brownfield Clean-up Programmes: The Cook County Experience. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47(3):393–405.Google Scholar