Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:21:25.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Article: Survival of Culturable Bacteria during Co-composting of Institutional, Agricultural, and Municipal Solid Wastes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Timothy R. Kelley ,
Paul M. Walker  and
K. D. Smiciklas
Timothy R. Kelley*
Affiliation:
Health Sciences Department, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois
Paul M. Walker
Affiliation:
Agriculture Department, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois
K. D. Smiciklas
Affiliation:
Agriculture Department, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois
*
Health Sciences Department, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790–5220; (fax) 309-438-2450; (e-mail) trkelle@ilstu.edu
Get access

Extract

Cooperation among waste generators to co-compost institutional, agricultural, and municipal solid waste can balance carbon: nitrogen ratios, yield a value-added product, and ultimately reduce solid waste disposal nationally. A study was conducted to determine concentrations of indicator bacteria and other bacteria in compost components, immature compost, and cured compost. Compost components included pulped institutional food waste, newsprint, farm animal waste, and municipal landscape waste. Carbon:nitrogen ratios were balanced (mean = 30:1) through cooperative co-composting of institutional and agricultural waste with municipal landscape waste. Compost windrows were mechanically turned an average of 15 times during 60-days of composting, reaching highest internal mean temperatures of 62° C. Raw food waste, animal waste, immature and cured compost samples were collected aseptically and analyzed for total and fecal coliform, Enterococci, Staphylococci, and heterotrophic bacteria using standard culturing techniques. Initial indicator bacterial concentrations of 4–8 log10 colony forming units (cfu) per milliliter (ml−1) or gram (g−1) dry weight recovered from animal waste and 2–3 log10 cfu g−1 dry weight recovered from raw food waste were reduced to below the detection limit of approximately 20 cfu g−1 dry weight in all compost samples analyzed. Staphylococci and heterotrophic bacteria concentrations recovered from immature compost samples were also reduced in cured compost. Results indicated that cooperative waste composting reduced culturable indicator bacteria concentrations in compost samples analyzed. Results suggested that cooperative solid waste composting may reduce environmental health concerns associated with institutional, agricultural, and municipal wastes, while generating a value-added soil amendment and reducing solid waste volume.

Type
Features & Reviews
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 162 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. U.S. Environmental protection agency, characterization of municipal waste in the U.S.: 1996 update, (1997) EPA/530-R-92-019, U.S. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

2. Rhyner, C., Schwartz, L., Wenger, R., and Kohrell, M.. (1995) Waste management and resource recovery. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

3. Salvato, J. (1992) Environmental engineering and sanitation, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons (Wiley Interscience).Google Scholar

4. Kelley, T. R. and Walker, P. (1999) Bacterial concentration reduction of food waste-amended animal feed using a single-screw dry-extrusion process. Bioresource Technology 67(3):247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Walker, P. and Kelley, T. (1997)Google Scholar Selected fractionated composition and microbiological analysis of institutional food waste, pre- and post-extrusion. Final Report, Illinois Council on Food and Agricultural Research (C-FAR).

6. Barth, K. M., Vander Noot, G., MacGrath, W., and Kornegay, E. (1966) Nutritive value of garbage as a feed for swine. II. Mineral content and supplementation. Journal of Animal Science 25:52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

7. Kornegary, E. T., Vander Noot, G., MacGrath, W., Welch, J., and Purkhiser, E. (1965) Nutritive value as a feed for swine. I. Chemical composition, digestibility, and nitrogen utilization of various types of garbage. Journal of Animal Science 24:319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Kornegary, E. T., Vander Noot, G., MacGrath, W., and Barth, K. (1968) Nutritive value as a feed for swine. III. Vitamin composition, digestibility, and nitrogen utilization of various types. Journal of Animal Science 27:1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Said, N. (1989) Dry extrusion—a solution to the wet waste problems. InstaPro Update. InstaPro International, Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar

10. Walker, P. (1995)Google Scholar ISU Trial 915: Recycling food waste as a cattle feed and as a soil amendment. Final Report, Contract # 96-206-304, formerly SWD 57. Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources, Office of Solid Waste and Renewable Resources, Technologies and Practices Demonstration Program.

11. Walker, P. (1999) Utilization of livestock and urban waste compost as a soil amendment, Final Report, Contract # 97B128. Illinois Pork Producers Association (IPPA).Google Scholar

12. Haur, R. T. (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar

13. Kelley, T. R., Pancorbo, O., Merka, W., Thompson, S., Cabrera, M., and Barnhart, H. (1994) Fate of selected bacterial pathogens and indicators in fractionated poultry litter during storage. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 3:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14. Kelley, T. R., Pancorbo, O., Merka, W., Thompson, S., Cabrera, M., and Barnhart, H. (1995) Bacterial pathogens and indicators in poultry litter during re-utilization. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4:366–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15. Hedges, S. (1996) Compost is a natural-born killer. New Scientist September, 151:25.Google Scholar

16. Roe, N. (1998) Analyzing results on lawns and farm crops. Biocycle February, 39:62–3.Google Scholar

17. Ponugoti, P. R., Dahab, M. F., Surampalli, R.. (1997) Effects of different biosolids treatment systems on pathogen and pathogen indicator reduction. Water Environment Research 69:1195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18. Hay, J. (1996) Pathogen destruction and biosolids composting. Biocycle 06, 37:67–72.Google Scholar

19. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Ed. (1995) American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.Google Scholar

20. Atlas, R. M., Bartha, R.. (1987) Microbial Ecology, 2nd Edition. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc., Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar