Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:16:11.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Membership in Voluntary Organizations on the Colorado Plateau: A Reexamination of the Technical Information Quandary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2005

Kurt Cline
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, California State University, Fresno, California
Berton L. Lamb
Affiliation:
US Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado
Get access

Abstract

Many scholars note the increasing desire of the public to be involved in the policy process. Others observe, however, that public participation in governance is declining. One possible explanation for this is that people do not know the technical and scientific language that is frequently used in these decision processes. Citizens simply lack the information to participate in a meaningful way. This is what is known as the “technical information quandary” (i.e., how citizen desires for increased participation can be balanced against the increasingly technical nature of public policy). Research on public participation suggests membership in voluntary associations or organizations is positively associated with higher levels of technical policy knowledge. Recreation management on the Colorado Plateau provides an excellent opportunity to examine the relationship between membership in voluntary organizations and the level of policy knowledge. In 1998, we surveyed the public living on the Colorado Plateau to ascertain their level of knowledge of technical terms and their level of participation in voluntary organizations. We found that a variety of factors were related to people's membership in these organizations. In particular, our findings indicate that those with higher levels of knowledge were significantly more likely to be members of voluntary organizations and that this knowledge was most likely to come from the organizations. These findings have important implications for environmental managers, as well as for the voluntary organizations themselves.

Type
FEATURES & REVIEWS
Copyright
© 2005 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Absher, J. D., D. W. McCollum, and J. M. Bowker. 1999. The Value of Research in Recreation Fee Project Implementation. Journal of Park and Recreation Management 17(3):116120.Google Scholar
Beierle, T. C., and J. Cayford. 2002. Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC, 149 pp.
Calvert, J. 1987. Partisanship and Ideology in State Legislative Action on Environmental Issues. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Anaheim, CA.
Cline, K. 2000. Defining the Implementation Problem: Organizational Management versus Cooperation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(3):551571.Google Scholar
Cline, K., L. Lamb, and P. Ponds. 2004. Attentive Public and General Public Expectations about Access Fees and Road Closures to Manage Recreation on Public Lands. Unpublished manuscript, 23 pp.
Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. Wiley, New York, 325 pp.
Dunlap, R. 1992. Trends in Public Opinion towards the Environment: 1965–1990. In American Environmentalism: The US Environmental Movement 1970–1990, R. E. Dunlap and A. Mertig, eds. Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 121 pp.
Gastil, J., and J. P. Dillard. 1999. Increasing Political Sophistication through Public Deliberation. Political Communication 16:323.Google Scholar
Grahame, J. D., and T. D. Sisk, eds. 2002. Canyons, Cultures and Environmental Change: An Introduction to the Land-Use History of the Colorado Plateau. http://www.cpluhna.nau.edu. Accessed May 24, 2005.
Hadden, S. G. 1989. A Citizen's Right to Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 239 pp.
Howell, S., and S. Laska. 1992. The Changing Face of the Environmental Coalition: A Research Note. Environment and Behavior 24:134144.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 484 pp.
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, 158 pp.
Lal, P., H. Lim-Applegate, and M. Scoccimarro. 2001. The Adaptive Decision-Making Process as a Tool for Integrated Natural Resource Management: Focus, Attitudes, and Approach. Conservation Ecology 5(2):11.Google Scholar
Lamb, L., and P. Ponds. 1999. Report to Respondents on Knowledge-Holding Studies: Descriptive Statistics for Knowledge-Holding Studies of SE Utah, SW Colorado/NW New Mexico, and Colorado Plateau Opinion Leaders. US Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, Fort Collins, CO, 55 pp.
Markell, D. L. 2004. Enhancing Citizen Involvement in Environmental Governance. Natural Resources & Environment (Spring):4952.Google Scholar
Marschall, M. J. 2004. Citizen Participation and Neighborhood Context: A New Look at the Coproduction of Local Public Goods. Political Research Quarterly 57(2):231244.Google Scholar
Menard, S. W. 1995. Applied Logistic Regression. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-106. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 111 pp.
Miller, J. D., R. Pardo, and F. Niwa. 1997. Public Perceptions of Science and Technology: A Comparative Study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada. Fundacion BBV, Madrid, 140 pp.
Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 290 pp.
Pierce, J. C., M. A. E. Steger, B. S. Steel, and N. P. Lovrich, Jr. 1992. Citizens, Political Communication, and Interest Groups: Environmental Organizations in Canada and the United States. Praeger, Westport, CT, 225 pp.
Pierce, J. C., and N. P. Lovrich, Jr. 1986. Water Resources, Democracy and the Technical Information Quandary. Associated Faculty Press, Inc., Millwood, NY, 216 pp.
Pierce, J. C., K. Beatty, and P. Hagner. 1982. The Dynamics of American Public Opinion: Patterns & Processes. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL, 385 pp.
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, 541 pp.
Rea, L., and R. Parker. 1997. Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, 2nd Edition. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco, CA, 254 pp.
Rich, P. 2002. Bowling Together: On Belonging to Organizations. The Review of Policy Research 19(2):215219.Google Scholar
Shindler, B., B. Steel, and P. List. 1996. Public Judgments of Adaptive Management: A Response from Forest Communities. Journal of Forestry 94(June):412.Google Scholar
Steel, B. S., ed. 1997. Public Lands Management in the West: Citizens, Interest Groups, and Values. Praeger, Westport, CT, 208 pp.
Steel, B., D. Lach, P. List, and B. Shindler. 2001. The Role of Scientists in the Natural Resource and Environmental Policy Process: A Comparison of Canadian and American Publics. Journal of Environmental Systems 28(2):133155.Google Scholar
Steel, B. S., and N. P. Lovrich. 1997. An Introduction to Natural Resource Policy and the Environment: Changing Paradigms and Values. In Public Lands Management in the West: Citizens, Interest Groups, and Values, B. Steel, ed. Praeger, Westport, CT, 208 pp.
Tuler, S., and T. Webler. 1999. Voices in the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process. Society and Natural Resources 12:437453.Google Scholar
Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 640 pp.
Wengert, N. 1976. Participation and the Administrative Process. In Water Politics and Public Involvement, J. C. Pierce and H. R. Doerksen, eds. Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 294 pp.