Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T06:25:40.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Survey of Fluoride Pollution Effects on the Forest Ecosystem Around an Aluminium Factory in Mirzapur, U.P., India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

G. P. Pandey
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India.

Extract

A survey of vegetation around an aluminium factory in Renukoot, Mirzapur, U.P., India, was made in the course of a study of the polluting effects on plants of gaseous hydrogen fluoride. These ‘pollugenic’ effects were analyzed by examining the chlorotic and necrotic symptoms of injury on the leaf surfaces, the plants then being classified into three categories on the basis of their sensitivity.

The study revealed the absence, from the vicinity of the factory, of certain plant species which are normally present in the surrounding unpolluted areas. The tree species were the first to be affected, followed by shrubs, grasses, and finally forbs. These differences in response could be attributed in part to differences between the ambient air and ground-level concentrations of the pollutant. The concentrations in the ambient air, being higher than those at ground-level, were responsible for the greater impact on trees, with less on shrubs and grasses, and least on forbs, this being in part a function of the exposure-height of the plant species.

The gradual improvement noted in the performance of the plants and the number of their species at increasing distances from the aluminium factory, was consequent on the gradual decrease in the concentration of the polluting hydrogen fluoride. Such a trend is clearly evident in the north-east direction, where the pollutant fallout was directed by the prevailingly southwesterly winds.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Backett, P. H. T., Woolen, E., Camse, P. A., Hisrog, F. S. & Williams, D. R. (1978). The use of grasses as indicators of environmental pollution. Plant and Soil, 49 (3), pp. 691–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bligny, R., Garrec, J. P. & Fourcy, A. (1972). Migration et accumulation du fluor chez Zea mays. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 275(D), pp. 755–8.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. (1969). Factors controlling the marine geochemistry of fluoride. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 33, pp. 1153–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, A. F. (1964). Atmospheric poUution of Belfast and its relationship to the lichen flora. Ir. Natur. J., 14, pp. 237–45.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. P. & Thorne, L. (1972). Vegetation to reduce in pollution. Lasca Leaves, 20, pp. 60–5.Google Scholar
Hill, A. C. (1971). Vegetation: A sink for atmospheric pollutants. J. Air Pollution Cont. Assoc, 21, pp. 341–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodge, H. C. & Smith, F. A. (1977). Occupational fluoride exposure. J. Occup. Med., 19, pp. 1239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Israel, G. W. (1974). A field study of the correlation of static lime-paper sampler with forage and cattle urine. Atmos. Environ., 8, pp. 167–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, J. S., Weinstein, L. H., McCune, D. C. & Hitchcock, A. E. (1966). The accumulation of fluoride by plants. J. Air Pollution Cont. Assoc, 16, pp. 412–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, T. (1974). Translocation of fluorine in woody plants. Fluoride, 7, pp. 31–5.Google Scholar
Kronberger, W. & Halbwachs, G. (1978). Distribution of fluoride in Zea mays grown near an aluminum plant. Fluoride, 11(3), pp. 129–35.Google Scholar
Leone, I. A., Brennan, E. & Daines, R. H. (1964). Weeds are sensitive to pollution of atmosphere. New Jersey Agric., 46(3), pp. 610.Google Scholar
Mavrodineanu, R., Gwirtsman, J., McCune, D. C. & Porter, C. A. (1962). Summary of procedures used in the controlled fumigation of plants with volatile fluorides and in the determination of fluorides in air, water, and plant tissues. Cont. Boyce Thomp. Inst., 21, pp. 453–64.Google Scholar
Meetham, A. R. (1952). Atmospheric Pollution: Its Origin and Prevention. Macmillan Company, New York, NY: xii + 301 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Megregian, S. (1954). Rapid spectrophotometric determination of fluoride with zirconium-eriochrome cyanine-R lake. Anal. Chem., 26, pp. 1161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Megregian, S. (1958). Fluorine in chemical analysis. Pp. 231–59 in Vol. VIII. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
NAS (1971). U.S. National Academy of Sciences, ‘Fluorides’ Committee on Biological Effects of Atmospheric Pollutants. Div. Med. Sci., National Research Council, Washington, DC: 295 pp.Google Scholar
Ott, R. R. (1963). Control of fluoride emissions at Harvey Aluminum, Inc.: Soderberg Process Aluminum Reduction Mill. J. Air Pollution Cont. Assoc, 13, pp. 437–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pal, D. (1974). Effects of Fluoride Pollution on Plants and Cattle. Ph.D. thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India: v + 127 pp., illustr., mimeogr.Google Scholar
Semrau, I. K. T. (1957). Emission of fluorides from industrial processes—Review. J. Air Pollution Cont. Assoc, 7, pp. 92108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheikh, K. H., Öztürk, M. A., Seçmen, O. & Vardar, Y. (1976). Field studies of the effects of cement dust on the growth and yield of olive trees in Turkey. Environmental Conservation, 3(2), pp. 117–21,4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treshow, M. (1980). Pollution effects on plant distribution. Environmental Conservation, 7(4), pp. 279–86, 5 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treshow, M. & Pack, M. (1970). Fluoride in Recognition of Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation: A Pictorial Atlas (Ed. Jacobson, J. S. & Hill, A. C.). Air Pollution Control Association, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania: pp. D1D17.Google Scholar
WHO (1970). Fluorides and Human Health. Monograph Series No. 59, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland: 364 pp.Google Scholar