Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T14:05:23.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Status of Scientific Activities in United States Biosphere Reserves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Monica Goigel Turner  and
William P. Gregg Jr
Monica Goigel Turner
Affiliation:
Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
William P. Gregg Jr
Affiliation:
MAB Coordinator, US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The United States Biosphere Reserve network was begun in 1974, and currently numbers 38 sites. An investigation into the status of scientific activities in US Biosphere Reserves was conducted in 1981 to determine how well the network was meeting the multiple objectives of the Man and the Biosphere Programme. A survey questionnaire was administered to all US Biosphere Reserves, covering the adequacy of available data-bases, the types of research conducted, the perceived anthropogenic threats, funding, support, facilities, and educational programmes. Based on predominant management emphasis, Biosphere Reserves were designated as experimental or observational (i.e. conservational) for the purpose of analysis of the data.

The results of our survey indicate that baseline scientific data, such as aerial photography, bibliographies, weather data, flora and fauna checklists and keys, and topographic maps, are generally available for most of the US Biosphere Reserves; environmental monitoring activities are more comprehensive than ecological research activities, but topic emphasis varies with the management's orientation of the Reserves. Experimentally-oriented Reserves tend to emphasize biological productivity, succession, silviculture, and forest restoration and management, while observationally-oriented Reserves tend towards descriptive studies.

In almost all scientific activities, experimental Reserves were scored higher than observational (‘conservation’) Reserves in terms of general value; they have also received significantly more funding for scientific research. In all Reserves, most natural resources are considered to be effectively protected. Observational Reserves report a greater number of anthropogenic threats, including air and water pollution, exotic species, operations problems, resource removal, and visitor impacts; but they are addressing a greater proportion of these threats than are experimental Reserves. Most Reserves communicate natural history and other scientific information to the public, but many do not discuss MAB or its goals. Almost all the 38 US Biosphere Reserves are used for professional training and have basic support-facilities for field-work.

Recommendations made for improving the effectiveness of US Biosphere Reserves include: strengthening communications among Reserves within the network; initiating more cooperative studies at all geographic levels; intensifying scientific research in observational (‘conservation’) Reserves; improving the status of ecological research on aquatic systems and soils, and at the ecosystem level in all Reserves; also designing studies which focus on Man as an integral part of the system and how Mankind might exist in improved concert with The Biosphere. The designation of a multiple-site Biosphere Reserve bearing the name of the biogeographic region in which it occurs, is now being used both to conserve a region's representative ecosystems and to foster cooperation among sites. We believe this is a workable approach and an important first step in implementing these recommendations regionally and, so far as they prove practicable, ultimately globally.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1983 , pp. 231 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batisse, M. (1980). The relevance of MAB. Environmental Conservation, 7(3), pp. 179–84, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, M. (1981). MAB: A new scientific approach to environmental management and conservation. Parks, 6(1), pp. 7–11.Google Scholar
Batisse, M. (1982). The Biosphere Reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 101–11, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, G.K. & Johnson, R.A. (1977). Statistical Concepts and Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: xvi + 639 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Fernald, E.A., Armentano, T.V., Radford, A., Sharitz, R., Wharton, C. & Gregg, W.P. Jr (1981). Identification and Selection of Biosphere Reserves: Report to the US MAB Project Directorate on Biosphere Reserves. Available from the US MAB Secretariat, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240, USA: 60 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Franklin, J.F. (1977). The Biosphere Reserve program in the United States. Science, 195, pp. 262–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilbert, V.C. & Gregg, W.P. Jr (1981). Development of the Biosphere Reserve Network under UNESCO's Man and the Biosphere Programme. Presented at 32nd annual meeting of the American Institute of Biological Sciences, Bloomington, Indiana, 16–21 08 1981, [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Gregg, W.P. Jr & Goigel, M.M. (in press). The Biosphere Reserve project: the United States experience. Proc. Tenth Anniversary Conf. Man and the Biosphere Programme, Paris, France, 22–29 September 1981. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, UK.Google Scholar
Mack, A., Gregg, W.P. Jr, Bratton, S.P. & White, P.S., (1983). A survey of ecological inventory, monitoring, and research, in US National Park Service Biosphere Reserves. Biol. Conserv., 26, pp. 33–45, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, P.G. & Cornelison, K.D. (1979). Man and the Biosphere: US Information Synthesis Project. (MAB-8, Biosphere Reserves.) University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, USA: 109 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Udvardy, M.D.F. (1975). A classification of the biogeographical provinces of the world. IUCN Occasional Paper No. 18, IUCN, Morges, Switzerland: 49 pp.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1974). Task-force on criteria and guidelines for the choice and establishment of Biosphere Reserves. (Paris, France, 22–24 May 1974.) MAB Report Series No. 22: 61 pp.Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior, National Park Service (1980). State of the Parks 1980: A Report to Congress. Office of Science and Technology, National Park Service, Washington, DC, USA: x + 57 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
White, P.S. & Bratton, S.P. (1980). After preservation: Philosophical and practical problems of change. Biol. Conserv., 18, pp. 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar