Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:54:15.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of sea level rise on discounting, resource use and migration in small-island communities: an agent-based modelling approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

ADAM DOUGLAS HENRY
Affiliation:
School of Government and Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
ANDREAS EGELUND CHRISTENSEN
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
REBECCA HOFMANN
Affiliation:
Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
IVO STEIMANIS
Affiliation:
Marburg Centre for Institutional Economics (MACIE), School of Business and Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
BJÖRN VOLLAN*
Affiliation:
Marburg Centre for Institutional Economics (MACIE), School of Business and Economics, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
*
*Correspondence: Prof Dr Björn Vollan email: bjoern.vollan@wiwi.uni-marburg.de

Summary

Time discounting – the degree to which individuals value current more than future resources – is an important component of natural resource conservation. As a response to climate change impacts in island communities, such as sea level rise, discounting the future can be a rational response due to increased stress on natural resources and uncertainty about whether future generations will have the same access to the same resources. By incorporating systematic responses of discount rates into models of resource conservation, realistic expectations of future human responses to climate change and associated resource stress may be developed. This paper illustrates the importance of time discounting through a theoretical agent-based model of resource use in island communities. A discount rate change can dramatically change projections about future migration and community-based conservation efforts. Our simulation results show that an increase in discount rates due to a credible information shock about future climate change impacts is likely to speed resource depletion. The negative impacts of climate change are therefore likely to be underestimated if changes in discount rates and emerging migration patterns are not taken into account.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000339

References

REFERENCES

Albert, S., Leon, J.X., Grinham, A.R., Church, J.A., Gibbes, B.R. & Woodroffe, C.D. (2016) Interactions between sea-level rise and wave exposure on reef island dynamics in the Solomon Islands. Environmental Research Letters 11: 54011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkire, W.H. (1965) Lamotrek atoll and inter-island socioeconomic ties [www document]. URL https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/61057 Google Scholar
Bar-Gill, O. & Fershtman, C. (2005) Public policy with endogenous preferences. Journal of Public Economic Theory 7: 841857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M., Blattman, C., Chytilová, J., Henrich, J., Miguel, E. & Mitts, T. (2016) Can war foster cooperation? National Bureau of Economic Research [www document]. URL http://www.nber.org/papers/w22312 Google Scholar
Bayliss-Smith, T., Gough, K.V., Christensen, A.E. & Kristensen, S.P. (2010) Managing Ontong Java: social institutions for production and governance of atoll resources in Solomon Islands. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 31: 5569.Google Scholar
Becker, M., Meyssignac, B., Letetrel, C., Llovel, W., Cazenave, A. & Delcroix, T. (2012) Sea level variations at tropical Pacific Islands since 1950. Global and Planetary Change 80–81: 8598.Google Scholar
Bénabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The Review of Economic Studies 70: 489520.Google Scholar
Benjamin, D., Choi, J. & Strickland, A.J. (2010) Social identity and preferences. American Economic Review 100: 19131928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, P.R., Rand, D.G., Tingley, D. & Warneken, F. (2015) The shadow of the future promotes cooperation in a repeated prisoner's dilemma for children. Scientific Reports 5: 14559.Google Scholar
Dal Bo, P. (2005) Cooperation under the shadow of the future: experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games. The American Economic Review 95: 15911604.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (1998) Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 75111.Google Scholar
Bowles, S. (2008) Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine ‘the moral sentiments’: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320: 16051609.Google Scholar
Callen, M. (2015) Catastrophes and time preference: evidence from the Indian Ocean earthquake. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 118: 199214.Google Scholar
Cameron, L.A. & Shah, M. (2015) Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Journal of Human Resources 50: 484515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castillo, M., Ferraro, P.J., Jordan, J.L. & Petrie, R. (2011) The today and tomorrow of kids: time preferences and educational outcomes of children. Journal of Public Economics 95: 13771385.Google Scholar
Chabris, C., Laibson, D., Morris, C., Schuldt, J. & Taubinsky, D. (2008) Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 37: 237269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, A.E. (2011) Marine gold and atoll livelihoods: the rise and fall of the bêche-de-mer trade on Ontong Java, Solomon Islands. Natural Resources Forum 35: 920.Google Scholar
Christensen, A.E. & Gough, K.V. (2012) Island mobilities: spatial and social mobility on Ontong Java, Solomon Islands. Geografisk Tidsskrift – Danish Journal of Geography 112: 5262.Google Scholar
Christensen, A.E. & Mertz, O. (2010) Researching Pacific island livelihoods: mobility, natural resource management and nissology. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 51: 278287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Church, J.A., Clark, P.U., Cazenave, A., Gregory, J.M., Jevrejeva, S., Levermann, A., Merrifield, M.A., Milne, G.A., Nerem, R.S., Nunn, P.D., Payne, A.J., Pfeffer, W.T., Stammer, D. & Unnikrishnan, A.S. (2013) Sea level change. Cambridge University Press [www document]. URL http://drs.nio.org/drs/handle/2264/4605 Google Scholar
Connell, P.J. (2010) Pacific islands in the global economy: paradoxes of migration and culture. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 31: 115129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, P.J. (2008) Niue: embracing a culture of migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34: 10211040.Google Scholar
Farbotko, C. & Lazrus, H. (2012) The first climate refugees? Contesting global narratives of climate change in Tuvalu. Global Environmental Change 22: 382390.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Hoff, K. (2011) Introduction: tastes, castes and culture: the influence of society on preferences. The Economic Journal 121: F396F412.Google Scholar
Fehr, E. & Leibbrandt, A. (2011) A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. Journal of Public Economics 95: 11441155.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D. & Levine, D.K. (2006) A dual-self model of impulse control. American Economic Review 96: 14491476.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 12431248.Google Scholar
Henry, A.D. & Dietz, T. (2012) Understanding environmental cognition. Organization & Environment 25: 238258.Google Scholar
Henry, A.D. & Vollan, B. (2012) Risk, networks, and ecological explanations for the emergence of cooperation in commons governance. Rationality, Markets and Morals [www document]. URL http://econpapers.repec.org/article/rmmjournl/v_3a3_3ay_3a2012_3ai_3a59.htm Google Scholar
Hoch, S.J. & Loewenstein, G.F. (1991) Time-inconsistent preferences and consumer self-control. Journal of Consumer Research 17: 492507.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; London, UK; New Delhi, India: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Jaeger, D.A., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U. & Bonin, H. (2010) Direct evidence on risk attitudes and migration. The Review of Economics and Statistics 92: 684689.Google Scholar
Khwaja, A., Sloan, F. & Salm, M. (2006) Evidence on preferences and subjective beliefs of risk takers: the case of smokers. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24: 667682.Google Scholar
King, R. (2009) Geography, islands and migration in an era of global mobility. Island Studies Journal 4: 5384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lata, S. & Nunn, P. (2011) Misperceptions of climate-change risk as barriers to climate-change adaptation: a case study from the Rewa Delta, Fiji. Climatic Change 110: 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, T., Hornborg, A. & Crumley, C. (2007) No island is an ‘island’: some perspectives on human ecology and development in Oceania. The World System and the Earth System: Global Socioenvironmental Change and Sustainability since the Neolithic 395: 268279.Google Scholar
Mann, T. & Westphal, H. (2014) Assessing long-term changes in the beach width of reef islands based on temporally fragmented remote sensing data. Remote Sensing 6: 69616987.Google Scholar
Mattauch, L. & Hepburn, C. (2016). Climate policy when preferences are endogenous – and sometimes they are. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 40: 7695.Google Scholar
McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G. & Cohen, J.D. (2004) Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306: 503507.Google Scholar
Meier, S. & Sprenger, C. (2010) Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2: 193210.Google Scholar
Meier, S. & Sprenger, C.D. (2013) Discounting financial literacy: time preferences and participation in financial education programs. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 95: 159174.Google Scholar
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. & Rodriguez, M.L. (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244: 933938.Google Scholar
Nicholls, R.J., Marinova, N., Lowe, J.A., Brown, S., Vellinga, P., Gusmão, D., Hinkel, J. & Tol, R.S.J. (2011) Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a ‘beyond 4°C world’ in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369: 161181.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, W. (2014) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: concepts and results from the dice-2013r model and alternative approaches. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1: 273312.Google Scholar
Nunn, P.D. (2013) The end of the Pacific? Effects of sea level rise on Pacific Island livelihoods. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 34: 143171.Google Scholar
O'Donoghue, T. & Rabin, M. (1999) Doing it now or later. The American Economic Review 89: 103124.Google Scholar
Pachauri, R.K., Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R. & Broome, J. (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC [www document]. URL http://epic.awi.de/37530/ Google Scholar
Peter, J. (2000) Chuukese travellers and the idea of horizon. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 41: 253267.Google Scholar
Peterson, J.A. (2009) The Austronesian moment. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 37: 136158.Google Scholar
Rai, V. & Henry, A.D. (2016) Agent-based modelling of consumer energy choices. Nature Climate Change 6: 556562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, P. & Connell, J. (1991) Climatic change and the future of atoll states. Journal of Coastal Research 7: 10571075.Google Scholar
Rudiak-Gould, P. (2013) Cross-cultural insights into climate change skepticism. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94: 17071713.Google Scholar
Schelling, T.C. (2006) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York, NY, USA: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Schweizer, N. & Szech, N. (2016) Optimal revelation of life-changing information. Rochester, NY, USA: Social Science Research Network [www document]. URL https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2805842 Google Scholar
Staats, H.J., Wit, A.P. & Midden, C.Y.H. (1996) Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 46: 189203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N.H. (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T. & Guagnano, G.A. (1995) The new environmental paradigm in social psychological perspective. Environment & Behavior 27: 723745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M., Kocher, M.G., Glätzle-Rützler, D. & Trautmann, S.T. (2013) Impatience and uncertainty: experimental decisions predict adolescents’ field behavior. The American Economic Review 103: 510531.Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H. & Shefrin, H.M. (1981) An economic theory of self-control. Journal of Political Economy 89: 392406.Google Scholar
Voors, M.J., Nillesen, E.E.M., Verwimp, P., Bulte, E.H., Lensink, R. & Van Soest, D.P. (2012) Violent conflict and behavior: a field experiment in Burundi. The American Economic Review 102: 941964.Google Scholar
Wang, M., Rieger, M.O. & Hens, T. (2016) How time preferences differ: evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology 52: 115135.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Henry supplementary material

Henry supplementary material 1

Download Henry supplementary material(File)
File 124.6 KB