Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T11:58:49.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Greater tree community structure complexity in sacred forest compared to reserve forest land tenure systems in eastern India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2020

Subhani Rath ,
Subham Banerjee  and
Robert John Open the ORCID record for Robert John [Opens in a new window]
Subhani Rath
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, Room S-235, Research Complex, Mohanpur 741246, West Bengal, India
Subham Banerjee
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, Room S-235, Research Complex, Mohanpur 741246, West Bengal, India
Robert John*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Kolkata, Room S-235, Research Complex, Mohanpur 741246, West Bengal, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Robert John, Email: robert.john@iiserkol.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sacred forests are small patches of forest that are preserved and protected from human exploitation. Although they are identified primarily for spiritual or religious purposes, their contribution to biodiversity conservation has been widely debated. Sacred sites are known to harbour greater biodiversity compared to exploited forests, but the patterns are not well known. We studied tree diversity in a remote forested location in eastern India where sacred forests and reserve forests used by people are present. Tree data from eight sacred forest sites and nine reserve forest sites showed that species richness was significantly greater in sacred forests; species diversity and evenness tended to be greater, but these were not statistically significant. Basal area (a measure of aboveground biomass) was significantly greater, mainly due to the greater density of large trees. There were significant departures from the theoretical expectation of stem size density distributions under pure asymmetric competition for both land tenures, which indicated that extraneous mortality increased death rates of large trees under both regimes, but sacred forests had a greater range of stem sizes. Our results suggest that sacred forests can contribute to biodiversity conservation by preserving greater tree diversity than forests subject to human use.

Keywords

conservationOdishareserve forestsacred foresttree diversitytribal cultures
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 47 , Issue 1: Thematic Section: Bringing Species and Ecosystems Together with Remote Sensing Tools to Develop New Biodiversity Metrics and Indicators , March 2020 , pp. 52 - 59
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allendorf, TD, Brandt, JS and Yang, JM (2014) Local perceptions of Tibetan village sacred forests in northwest Yunnan. Biological Conservation 169: 303–310.10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambinakudige, S and Sathish, BN (2009) Comparing tree diversity and composition in coffee farms and sacred forests in the Western Ghats of India. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 987–1000.10.1007/s10531-008-9502-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballullaya, UP, Reshmi, KS, Rajesh, TP, Manoj, K, Lowman, M and Allesh Sinu, P (2019) Stakeholder motivation for the conservation of sacred groves in south India: an analysis of environmental perceptions of rural and urban neighbourhood communities. Land Use Policy 89: 104213.10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 15188–15193.10.1073/pnas.0702098104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, SA, Kushalappa, CG, Williams, PA and Brown, ND (2005) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecology and Society 10: 8.10.5751/ES-01285-100108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwat, SA and Rutte, C (2006) Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 519–524.10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[519:SGPFBM]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boraiah, KT, Vasudeva, R, Bhagwat, SA and Kushalappa, CG (2003) Do informally managed sacred groves have higher richness and regeneration of medicinal plants than state-managed reserve forests? Current Science 84: 804–808.Google Scholar
Brandt, JS, Butsic, V, Schwab, B, Kuemmerle, T and Radeloff, VC (2015) The relative effectiveness of protected areas, a logging ban, and sacred areas for old-growth forest protection in southwest China. Biological Conservation 181: 1–8.10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, AG, Gullison, RE, Rice, RE and da Fonseca, GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128.10.1126/science.291.5501.125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, KP and Anderson, DR (2002) Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Byers, BA, Cunliffe, RN and Hudak, AT (2001) Linking the conservation of culture and nature: a case study of sacred forests in Zimbabwe. Human Ecology 29: 187–218.10.1023/A:1011012014240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardelús, CL, Scull, P, Hair, J, Baimas-George, M, Lowman, MD and Eshete, AW (2013) A preliminary assessment of Ethiopian sacred grove status at the landscape and ecosystem scales. Diversity 5: 320–334.10.3390/d5020320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandran, MDS and Hughes, JD (1997) The sacred groves of south India: ecology, traditional communities and religious change. Social Compass 44: 413–427.10.1177/003776897044003008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coomes, DA, Duncan, RP, Allen, RB and Truscott, J (2003) Disturbances prevent stem size-density distributions in natural forests from following scaling relationships. Ecology Letters 6: 980–989.10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00520.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dafni, A (2006) On the typology and the worship status of sacred trees with a special reference to the Middle East. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2: 26.10.1186/1746-4269-2-26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFries, R, Hansen, A, Turner, BL, Reid, R and Liu, J (2007) Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecological Applications 17: 1031–1038.10.1890/05-1111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dudley, N, Higgins-Zogib, L and Mansourian, S (2009) The links between protected areas, faiths, and sacred natural sites. Conservation Biology 23: 568–577.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01201.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enquist, BJ and Niklas, KJ (2001) Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature 410: 655.10.1038/35070500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forest Survey of India (2017) State of Forest Report 2017. Dehradun: Forest Survey of India [www document]. URL http://fsi.nic.in/details.php?pgID=sb_62 Google Scholar
Gadgil, M and Vartak, VD (1976) The sacred groves of Western Ghats in India. Economic Botany 30: 152–160.10.1007/BF02862961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, Y and Pala, NA (2011) Ecosystem services in sacred natural sites (SNSs) of Uttarakhand: a preliminary survey. Journal of Biodiversity 2: 107–115.10.1080/09766901.2011.11884731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of India (2013) Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India 2013. Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Statistics Division [www document]. URL www.tribal.nic.in Google Scholar
Hijmans, RJ, Cameron, SE, Parra, JL, Jones, PG and Jarvis, A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 1965–1978.10.1002/joc.1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutton, J, Adams, WM and Murombedzi, JC (2005) Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies 32: 341–370.10.1080/08039410.2005.9666319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadavul, K and Parthasarathy, N (1999) Plant biodiversity and conservation of tropical semi-evergreen forest in the Shervarayan hills of Eastern Ghats, India. Biodiversity and Conservation 8: 419–437.10.1023/A:1008899824399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, WF, Useche, DC, Rendeiro, J, Kalka, M, Bradshaw, CJA, Sloan, SP, Laurance, SG et al. (2012) Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489: 290–294.10.1038/nature11318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magurran, AE (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhotra, KC, Gokhale, Y and Chatterjee, S (2007) Sacred Groves in India. Bhopal, India: Aryan Books International.Google Scholar
Margules, CR and Pressey, RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405: 243.10.1038/35012251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, K, Ffrench-Constant, R and Gordon, I (2010) Sacred sites as hotspots for biodiversity: the Three Sisters Cave complex in coastal Kenya. Oryx 44: 118–123.10.1017/S0030605309990731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mgumia, FH and Oba, G (2003) Potential role of sacred groves in biodiversity conservation in Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 30: 259–265.10.1017/S0376892903000250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miehe, G, Miehe, S, Koch, K and Will, M (2003) Sacred forests in Tibet. Mountain Research and Development 23: 324–328.10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0324:SFIT]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, BP, Tripathi, OP, Tripathi, RS and Pandey, HN (2004) Effects of anthropogenic disturbance on plant diversity and community structure of a sacred grove in Meghalaya, northeast India. Biodiversity and Conservation 13: 421–436.10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006509.31571.a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, Brooks, TM, Pilgrim, JD, Konstant, WR, da Fonseca, GAB and Kormos, C (2003) Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100: 10309–10313.10.1073/pnas.1732458100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L, Holland, MB and Brandon, K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30: 219–252.10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.164507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, PK and Berkes, F (2008) Politics of co-optation: community forest management versus joint forest management in Orissa, India. Environmental Management 41: 707–718.10.1007/s00267-008-9088-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner (2011) Census of India 2011. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner [www document]. URL http://censusindia.gov.in Google Scholar
Ormsby, AA and Bhagwat, SA (2010) Sacred forests of India: a strong tradition of community-based natural resource management. Environmental Conservation 37: 320–326.10.1017/S0376892910000561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, JD, Braun, DP and Unnasch, RS (2003) Are we conserving what we say we are? Measuring ecological integrity within protected areas. BioScience 53: 851–860.10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0851:AWCWWS]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pradhan, A, Ormsby, A and Behera, N (2019) Diversity, population structure, and regeneration potential of tree species in five sacred forests of western Odisha, India. Écoscience 26: 85–97.10.1080/11956860.2018.1522148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing [www document]. URL https://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
Ramakrishnan, PS (1996) Conserving the sacred: from species to landscapes. Nature & Resources 32: 11–19.Google Scholar
Rao, P, Barik, SK, Pandey, HN and Tripathi, RS (1990) Community composition and tree population structure in a sub-tropical broad-leaved forest along a disturbance gradient. Vegetatio 88: 151–162.10.1007/BF00044832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rath, S and John, R (2018) What factors influence the abundance and distribution of sacred forests in Odisha, a densely forested state in eastern India? International Journal of Environmental Studies 75: 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruelle, ML, Kassam, K-A and Asfaw, Z (2018) Human ecology of sacred space: church forests in the highlands of northwestern Ethiopia. Environmental Conservation 45: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutte, C (2011) The sacred commons: conflicts and solutions of resource management in sacred natural sites. Biological Conservation 144: 2387–2394.10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagar, R, Raghubanshi, AS and Singh, JS (2003) Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India. Forest Ecology and Management 186: 61–71.10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00235-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salick, J, Amend, A, Anderson, D, Hoffmeister, K, Gunn, B and Zhendong, F (2007) Tibetan sacred sites conserve old growth trees and cover in the eastern Himalayas. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saout, SL, Hoffmann, M, Shi, Y, Hughes, A, Bernard, C, Brooks, TM, Bertzky, B et al. (2013) Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342: 803–805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shahabuddin, G and Rao, M (2010) Do community-conserved areas effectively conserve biological diversity? Global insights and the Indian context. Biological Conservation 143: 2926–2936.10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheridan, MJ (2009) The environmental and social history of african sacred groves: a Tanzanian case study. African Studies Review 52: 73–98.10.1353/arw.0.0149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, NM (2013) The affective labor of growing forests and the becoming of environmental subjects: rethinking environmentality in Odisha, India. Geoforum 47: 189–198.10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Bhat, JA, Malik, ZA, Youssouf, M, Bussmann, RW and Kunwar, RM (2019) Sacred groves in Western Himalaya, India: community-managed nature refuges for conservation of biodiversity and culture. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 18: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sponsel, LE (2012) Spiritual Ecology: A Quiet Revolution. Santa Barbara, CA, USA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, TT, Struhsaker, PJ and Siex, KS (2005) Conserving Africa’s rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 45–54.10.1016/j.biocon.2004.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschuuren, B (2010) Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Virtanen, P (2002) The role of customary institutions in the conservation of biodiversity: sacred forests in Mozambique. Environmental Values 11: 227–241.10.3197/096327102129341073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadley, RL and Colfer, CJP (2004) Sacred forest, hunting, and conservation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Human Ecology 32: 313–338.10.1023/B:HUEC.0000028084.30742.d0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waikhom, AC, Nath, AJ and Yadava, PS (2018) Aboveground biomass and carbon stock in the largest sacred grove of Manipur, northeast India. Journal of Forestry Research 29: 425–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, A, Ieno, EN, Walker, N, Saveliev, AA and Smith, GM (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. 2009 edition. New York, NY, USA: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Rath et al. supplementary material

Rath et al. supplementary material

Download Rath et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 356.5 KB