Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-dwt4q Total loading time: 0.213 Render date: 2021-06-14T01:02:04.512Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: a case study in Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2010

MARGARITA TRIGUERO-MAS
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain
MARC OLOMÍ-SOLÀ
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain
NAVEEN JHA
Affiliation:
Desphande Foundation, BVB Engineering College, 580031 Hubli, Karnataka, India
FRANCISCO ZORONDO-RODRÍGUEZ
Affiliation:
Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain
VICTORIA REYES-GARCÍA
Affiliation:
ICREA and Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Summary

Researchers, governments and conservation organizations recognize that the long-term integrity of protected areas (PAs) in low-income nations depends upon the support of indigenous and rural communities that live within or around them. Thus, understanding the determinants of residents’ attitudes towards PAs might provide guidance in the design, implementation and evaluation of this strategic form of biodiversity conservation. This paper (1) compares urban and rural residents’ perceptions of the impact of a PA and (2) analyses the association between the perception of economic, social and environmental impacts, and overall attitude towards the PA. Information was collected among urban and rural residents living in the vicinity of the Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary in the Western Ghats (Karnataka, India). Local residents’ attitudes towards the PA were mainly positive, especially among urban residents. Multivariate analysis showed a positive association between the perception of economic benefits and individual attitudes towards the PA. There was no statistically significant association between attitudes towards the PA and perception of social and environmental impacts. Future research should address whether positive attitudes translate into more sustainable behaviours.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the erradication of poverty. Science 306: 11461149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akama, J.S., Lant, C.L., & Burnett, G.W. (1995) Conflicting attitudes toward state wildlife conservation programs in Kenya. Society and Natural Resources 8: 133144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allendorf, T.D., Smith, J. & Anderson, D. (2007) Residents’ perception of Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning 82: 3340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allendorf, T.D., Swe, K., Oo, T., Htut, Y., Aung, M., Allendorf, K., Hayek, L., Leimgruber, P. & Wemmer, C. (2006) Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma). Environmental Conservation 33: 344352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arjunan, M., Holmes, C., Puyravaud, J.P. & Davidar, P. (2006) Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 188197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbier, E.B. (1987) The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation 13: 101110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. (2004) Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18: 621630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, H.R. (2005) Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Walnut Creek, USA: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
Bonaiuto, M., Carrus, G., Martorella, H. & Bonnes, M. (2002) Local identity processes and environmental attitudes in land use changes: the case of natural protected areas. Journal of Economic Psychology 23: 631653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bose, A. (2001) Population of India: 2001 Census. Results and Methodology. New Delhi, India: B.R. Publishing.Google Scholar
Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice, R.E. & Fonseca, G.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, S. (1992) On the relationship between bird and woody plant diversity in Uttara Kannada district of South India. Ecology 89: 53115315.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidar, P., Arjunan, M., & Puyravaud, J-P. (2008) Why do local households harvest forest products? A case study from the southern Western Ghats, India. Biological Conservation 141: 18761884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boer, W. & Baquete, D. (1998) Natural resource use, crop damage and attitudes of rural people in the vicinity of the Maputo Elephant Reserve, Mozambique. Environmental Conservation 25: 208218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divan, W. & Rosencranz, A. (2001) Environmental Law and Policy in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. (2002) The local costs of establishing protected areas in low-income nations: Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Ecological Economics 43: 261275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiallo, E.A. & Jacobson, S.K. (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22: 241249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, M., Hedge, K.M. & Shetty, K.A.B. (1986) Uttar Kannada: a case study in hill area development. Karnataka State of Environment Report 1985–1986. Karnataka, India.Google Scholar
Gillingham, S. & Lee, PC. (1999) The impact of wildlife-related benefits on the conservation attitudes of local people around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 26: 218228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedge, B. & Gubbi, S. (2004) Conservation status of Anshi National Park and Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary. Oryx 38: 253254.Google Scholar
Heinen, J.T. (1993) Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a socioeconomic analysis. Environmental Conservation 20: 2534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. (2003) The influence of protected area outreach on conservation attitudes and resource use patterns: a case study from western Tanzania. Oryx 37: 305315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infield, M. (1988) Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local conservation area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation 45: 2146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Infield, M. & Namara, A. (2001) Community attitudes and behaviour towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx 35: 4860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, C. (2007) Perceptions of incentives for participation: insights from joint forest management in India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 14: 532542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannigel, E. (2008) Integrating parks and people: how does participation work in protected area management? Society and Natural Resources 21: 498511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, K., White, R. & Anke, F. (2007) Conflicts between humans over wildlife management: on the diversity of stakeholder attitudes and implications for conflict management. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 31293146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, J.A. & Heinen, J.T. (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28: 165–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, J.A. & Kellert, S.R. (1998) Local attitudes toward community-based conservation policy and programmes in Nepal: a case study in the Makalu-Barun conservation area. Environmental Conservation 25: 320333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez-Contreras, J., Dickinson, F. & Castillo-Burguete, T. (2008) Community member viewpoints on the Ria Celestun Biosphere Reserve, Yucatan, Mexico: suggestions for improving the community/natural protected area relationship. Human Ecology 36: 111123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthy, I.K., Murali, K.S., Hegde, G.T., Bhat, P.R. & Ravindranath, N.H. (2002) A comparative analysis of regeneration in natural forests and joint forest management plantations in Uttara Kannada district, Western Ghats. Current Science 83: 13581364.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R., Mittermeier, C., da Fonseca, G. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayak, P.K. & Berkes, F. (2008) Politics of co-optation: community forest management versus joint forest management in Orissa, India. Environmental Management 41: 707718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nepal, S.J. & Weber, K.E. (1995) The quandary of local park-people relations in Nepal's royal Chitwan National Park. Environmental Management 19: 853866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, W.D., Leonard, N.L., Sariko, H.I. & Gamassa, D.G.M. (1993) Conservation attitudes of local people living adjacent to five protected areas in Tanzania. Biological Conservation 63: 177183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, P.J.C., Asner, G.P., Knapp, D.E., Almeyda, A., Galvan-Gildemeister, R., Keene, S., Raybin, R.F. & Smith, R.C. (2007) Land-use allocation protects the Peruvian Amazon. Science 317: 12331236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pascal, J.P., Shyman Sunder, V. & Meher-Homji, V.M. (1984) Forest map of South-India-Sheet: Belgaum-Dharwar-Panaji. Karnataka Forest Department and French Institute of Pondicherry, Pondicherry, India.Google Scholar
Rao, M., Rabinowitz, A. & Khaing, S. (2002) Status review of the protected-area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 16: 360368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rishi, P. (2007) Joint forest management in India: an attitudinal analysis of stakeholders. Resources Conservation and Recycling 51: 345354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, P., McSweeny, K., Chhangani, A.K. & Rice, J.L. (2009) Conservation as it is: illicit resource use in a wildlife reserve in India. Human Ecology 37: 559575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, W.A., Panwar, H. & Mathur, V.B. (2002) Wildlife protected area network in India: a review. Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India.Google Scholar
Roth, R. (2004) On the colonial margins and in the global hotspot: park-people conflicts in highland Thailand. Asia Pacific Viewpoints 45: 1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2003) Conservation-related resettlement in central Africa: environmental and social risks. Development and Change 34: 525551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seetharaman, R. (2001) The law on wild life and protected areas in India. An analysis. Indian Journal of Environmental Law 2: 6184.Google Scholar
Singh, KS. (2003) People of India, Karnataka, Volume XXVI, Part Two. New Delhi, India: Affiliated East-West Press Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, T., Struhsaker, P. & Siex, K. (2005) Conserving Africa's rain forests: problems in protected areas and possible solutions. Biological Conservation 123: 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udaya Sekhar, N. (2003) Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management 69: 339347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weladji, R., Moe, S. & Vedeld, P. (2003) Stakeholder attitudes towards wildlife policy and the Benoue Wildlife Conservation Area, North Cameroon. Environmental Conservation 30: 334343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weller, S. (1998) Structured interviewing and questionnaire construction. In: The Handbook of Methods in Cultural Anthropology, ed. Bernard, H.R.. Walnut Creek, USA: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
West, P. & Brechin, S. (1991) Resident Peoples and National Parks: Social Dilemmas and Strategies in International Conservation. Tucson, AZ, USA: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
West, P., Igoe, J. & Brockington, D. (2006) Parks and peoples: the social impacts of protected areas. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 251277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittemyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, WT., Burton, A.C. & Brashares, J.S. (2008) Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321: 123126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: a case study in Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: a case study in Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Urban and rural perceptions of protected areas: a case study in Dandeli Wildlife Sanctuary, Western Ghats, India
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *