Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T18:23:42.398Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dredging Pollution and Environmental Conservation in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Lawrence K. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y. 12181, U.S.A.
Richard P. Leonard
Affiliation:
Environmental Systems and Energy Department, Calspan Corporation, Buffalo, N.Y. 14221, U.S.A.

Extract

Dredging operations are often needed for the improvement of a channel and/or harbour area. Unavoidably the water resources close to the dredging site will be contaminated to some degree. This paper initially presents the main feature and operation methods of new-work dredging and of maintenance dredging. The former comprises the improvement (i.e. deepening or widening) of a channel and/or harbour area mainly by removing stones and compacted sediments which were deposited through geologic ages. The latter is employed mainly to remove the loose sediments which tend to fill up previously excavated channels and harbours. The clamshell dredge, the dipper dredge, the pipeline dredge, and the hopper dredge, are four common types of dredges that are used for river and harbour excavation by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Their functions, operations, and cost data, are indicated.

In general only the sediments excavated from maintenance dredging operations are polluted with obnoxious or toxic contaminants that are detrimental to the land, air, and water, environment. The sources of pollution that are associated with the channel and harbour sediments may be categorized as being from municipal and industrial discharge, storm-runoff, agricultural runoff, soil erosion, and accidental spills.

Typical dredged materials from Ashtabula and Fairport Harbors in Ohio were collected and analyzed for investigation. It was found that the sediments varied widely, in their physical and chemical characteristics, between harbours and even at different locations within each harbour. Nevertheless, the pollutants in the dredged materials of a specific harbour (or channel) can be generally characterized. Settleability of the dredging samples was investigated in detail. It was observed that oil and grease and heavy-metals were intimately associated with sediments and could be removed with settlement of solids.

The current dredging practices in the U.S.A. includes the disposal of dredged materials in open sea, open lake, along-shore diked areas, off-shore diked areas, abandoned strip-mine areas, and other disposal sites. Due to the excellent settleability of the dredged materials, it is desirable that the polluted dredgings be stored on a disposal site for some time prior to any treatment. A disposal area can be used to create new land if satisfactory fill is produced. The satisfactory fill can be the non-polluted dredged materials from the new-work dredging operations, or well-treated sediments from maintenance dredging operations. The treated sediments or particles should be free from oil and grease, from toxic heavy-metals, and from any substances which are putrescent, deleterious, or odorous. They should not cause any organic decomposition or ground-water contamination.

The dredged materials can be separated into the sediment and the supernatant water (i.e., spoil) by settling. From the dredging-settling data presented in this paper, it appears that sufficient settling of dredging in a diked disposal area, followed by discharge of supernatant to Great Lakes water, will not contravene the proposed Great Lakes Water Standards, and so the goal of water resources conservation could be achieved.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1969). Dredging Water Quality Problems in the Great Lakes, Summary Report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo, N. Y.: 400 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Anon. (1974). Proposed Criteria for Water Quality (Public Water Supply Intake). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: Vol. I, 425 pp.Google Scholar
Anon. (1975). Proposed EPA Regulations on Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.: Technical Teport 40 FR 11990, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Drifmeyer, Jeffrey E. & Odum, William E. (1975). Lead, zinc, and manganese, in dredge-spoil pond ecosystems. Environmental Conservation, 2(1), pp. 3945, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar