Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:25:01.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attempted Understorey Characterization Using Aerial Photography in Kanha National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Mahesh C. Porwal  and
Parth S. Roy
Mahesh C. Porwal
Affiliation:
Scientist, Forestry & Ecology Division, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehra Dun 248 001, India
Parth S. Roy
Affiliation:
Head, Forestry & Ecology Division, Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehra Dun 248 001, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Remote sensing is being widely used in the fields of resource management, planning, and wildlife habitat evaluation. Canopy cover-type mapping has been done in most of the bioclimatic zones of India and widely abroad, using aerial photointerpretation techniques. In the present study an attempt has been made to develop a methodology for mapping understorey vegetation in part of Kanha National Park, using 1:10,000-scale black-and-white aerial photographs.

The Park, one of the best for Tiger (Felis tigris) visibility and observation of other large carnivores and herbivores, has been mapped, with subdivision into 11 vegetation cover-classes and four density-classes, using aerial photographs, and each class has been visited in the field for understorey information concerning different physiographic units. Each category of canopy-cover was sampled in the field, and tree base-cover per hectare has been estimated.

Vertical profiles have also been drawn in the main vegetation classes in order to understand the occurrence of understorey vegetation. It was found that a physiographic analysis coupled with canopy-cover type and density, with appropriate sampling in the individual vegetation strata, have together proved indicative of understorey vegetationtype. When the relationship between understorey vegetation and canopy-cover type is established, one can directly depict understorey limits spatially in conjunction with the main vegetation cover. Such an approach of mapping understorey vegetation using aerial photographs could be of immense value for wildlife habitat evaluation and park management.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1991 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Photogrammetry (1983). Manual of Remote Sensing, Vol. I (Eds Colwell, Robert N., Simonett, David S. & Ulaby, Fawwaz T.). Falls Church, Virginia, USA: 1232 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Beard, J.S. (1946). The Mora forests in Trinidad, British West Indies. J. Ecol., 33, pp. 173–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SirChampion, H.G. & Seth, S.K. (1968). A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India. Government Publications, New Delhi, India: xxvii + 404 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McIntosh, R. P. (1967). An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts of diversity. Ecology, 48, pp. 392–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panwar, H.S. (1986). Kanha National Park — a note on attributes and activities. Proceedings of the Seminar-cum-Workshop on Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Using Remote Sensing Techniques. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehra Dun, India: ii + 265 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Parihar, A.S. & Kotwal, P.C. (1989). Management Plan of Kanha National Park and Project Tiger, Kanha, for the Period 1989–90 to 1998–99. Project Tiger, Kanha, Mandla, India: xi + 402 pp.Google Scholar
Oosting, H.J. (1956). The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology, 2nd edn.W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco and London: viii + 440 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rodgers, W.A. & Panwar, H.S. (1988). Biogeographical Classification of India: Planning a Wildlife Protected Area Network in India, Vol. I. Wildlife Institute of India, New Forest, Dehra Dun, India: 341 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Tiwari, A.K. & Singh, J.S. (1984). Mapping forest biomass in India through aerial photographs and non-destructive field sampling. Applied Geography, 4, pp. 151–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomar, M.S. & Maslekar, A.R. (1974). Aerial Photographs in Landuse and Forest Surveys. Jugal Kishore & Co., Dehra Dun, India: xvii + 210 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Unni, N.V.M., Roy, P.S. & Parthasarathy, V. (1985). Evaluation of Landsat and airborne multispectral data and aerial photographs for mapping forest features and phenomena in a part of the Godavari Basin. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 6, pp. 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar