Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-x64cq Total loading time: 0.677 Render date: 2022-05-25T23:52:12.483Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Rural household participation in markets for non-timber forest products in Zambia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2013

Brian P. Mulenga
Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute, Lusaka, Zambia. E-mail:
Robert B. Richardson
Department of Community Sustainability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1222, USA. E-mail:
Gelson Tembo
University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia. E-mail:
Lawrence Mapemba
Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi. E-mail:


Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) support livelihoods in rural communities through provision of food, fuel, materials, medicines and income from sales. We estimated the contribution of NTFPs to rural household income in Zambia, and used a two-stage tobit alternative model to identify the factors associated with participation in NTFP markets. NTFPs accounted for 35 per cent of household income for participating households, second only to trading. Human capital variables and the value of assets were found to be significant determinants of both participation in business activities related to NTFPs and the associated household income, and the poor were more dependent on NTFPs than wealthier households. The effect of average rainfall underscores the role that NTFPs play in providing a safety net during periods of low crop yields. Rural development policies should recognize the role played by NTFPs in rural livelihoods and the need to balance welfare improvement and sustainable forest management.

Research Article
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Arnold, J.E.M. and Ruiz Pérez, M. (2001), ‘Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives?’, Ecological Economics 39(3): 437447.Google Scholar
Arnold, J.E.M., Köhlin, G., and Persson, R. (2006), ‘Woodfuels, livelihoods, and policy interventions: changing perspectives’, World Development 34(3): 596611.Google Scholar
Burke, W.J. (2009), ‘Fitting and interpreting Cragg's tobit alternative using Stata’, Stata Journal 9(4): 584592.Google Scholar
Burton, M., Dorsett, R., and Young, T. (1996), ‘Changing preferences for meat: evidence from UK household data, 1973–1993’, European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(3): 357370.Google Scholar
Byron, N. and Arnold, M. (1997), ‘What future for the people of the tropical forests?’, World Development 27(5): 789805.Google Scholar
Campbell, B.M., Angelsen, A., Cunningham, A., Katerere, Y., Sitoe, A., and Wunder, S. (2007), Miombo Woodlands – Opportunities and Barriers to Sustainable Forest Management, Harare: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).Google Scholar
Cavendish, W. (2000), ‘Empirical irregularities in the poverty–environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe’, World Development 28: 19792003.Google Scholar
Cragg, J. (1971), ‘Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods’, Econometrica 39: 829844.Google Scholar
CSO (Central Statistical Office) (2006), 2006 Living Conditions Monitoring Survey, Lusaka: Central Statistical Office, Government of Zambia.Google Scholar
de Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. (2001), ‘Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities’, World Development 29(3): 467480.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. (2004), ‘Household welfare and forest dependence in southern Malawi’, Environment and Development Economics 9(2): 135154.Google Scholar
Godoy, R.A. and Bawa, K.S. (1993), ‘The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forest: assumptions, hypotheses, and methods’, Economic Botany 47(3): 215219.Google Scholar
Government of the Republic of Zambia (2009), National Forestry Policy, Lusaka: Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources.Google Scholar
Gujarati, D. (2003), Basic Econometrics, 4th edn, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
Jimoh, S.O. (2006), ‘Sustaining the roles of non-timber forest products in rural poverty-reduction and household food security in Nigeria’, Journal of Fisheries International 1(2–4): 6369.Google Scholar
Jumbe, C.B.L., Bwalya, S.M., and Husselman, M. (2008), ‘Contribution of dry forests to rural livelihoods and the national economy in Zambia’, in Managing the Miombo Woodlands of Southern Africa, Technical Annex No. 1, World Bank, Sustainable Development Department, Environmental and Natural Resources Management Unit, Africa Region.Google Scholar
Kaimowitz, D. (2003), ‘Not by bread alone … forests and rural livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa’, in Oskanen, T., Pajari, B. and Tuomasjukka, T. (eds), Forests in Poverty Reduction Strategies: Capturing the Potential, EFI Proceedings No. 47, Joensuu, Finland: European Institute.Google Scholar
Lin, T. and Schmidt, P. (1984), ‘A test of the tobit specification against an alternative suggested by Cragg’, Review of Economics and Statistics 66(1): 174177.Google Scholar
Muino, I.T. (2009), ‘Non-wood forest products: the forgettable side of forest sector revenues in Mozambique: Mozambique and non-timber forest products: uses and perspectives’, XIII World Forestry Congress, 18–23 October, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. and Hirsch, E. (2000), ‘Commercialization of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research’, Technical Report, Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., McNair, M., Buck, L., Pimentel, M., and Kamil, J. (1997), ‘The value of forests to world food security’, Human Ecology 25(1): 91120.Google Scholar
Quang, D.V and Ahn, T.N. (2006), ‘Commercial collection of NTFPs and households living in or near forests: case study in Que Con Coung and Ma, Tuong Duong, NgeAn, Vietnam’, Ecological Economics 60(1): 6574.Google Scholar
Richardson, R.B. (2010), ‘Ecosystem services and food security: economic perspectives on environmental sustainability’, Sustainability 2: 35203548.Google Scholar
Shackleton, C.M and Shackleton, E.S. (2004), ‘The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa’, South African Journal of Science 100: 658664.Google Scholar
Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, E.S. (2006), ‘Household wealth status and natural resource use in the Kat River Valley, South Africa’, Ecological Economics 57(2): 306317.Google Scholar
Sunderland, T., Besong, S., and Ayeni, J. (2003), ‘Distribution, utilization and sustainability of non-timber forest products from Takamanda Forest Reserve, Cameroon’, Series 8,Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute/MAB Biodiversity Program.Google Scholar
Syampungani, S., Chirwa, P.W., Akinnifesi, F.K., Sileshi, G., and Ajayi, O.C. (2009), ‘The Miombo woodlands at the crossroads: potential threats, sustainable livelihoods, policy gaps and challenges’, Natural Resources Forum 33(2): 150159.Google Scholar
Teklewold, H., Dadi, L., Yami, A., and Dana, N. (2006), ‘Determinants of poultry technology adoption: a double-hurdle approach’, Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (3).Google Scholar
Wickens, G.E. (1991), ‘Management issues for development of non-timber forest products’, Unasylva 42(165): 38.Google Scholar
Woldehanna, T., Lansink, A.O., and Peerlings, J. (2000), ‘Off-farm work decisions on Dutch cash crop farms and the 1992 and Agenda 2000 CAP reforms’, Agricultural Economics 22: 163171.Google Scholar
Wollenberg, E. and Septiani, N.A. (1998), ‘Estimating the incomes of people who depend on forests’, in Wollenberg, E. and Ingles, A. (eds), Incomes from the Forest: Methods for the Development and Conservation of Forest Products for Local Communities, Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research, pp. 157187.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, J.M. (2008), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, Mason, OH: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Rural household participation in markets for non-timber forest products in Zambia
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Rural household participation in markets for non-timber forest products in Zambia
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Rural household participation in markets for non-timber forest products in Zambia
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *