Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T12:53:23.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Escaping the Japanese Pyramid: The Association of Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Entrepreneurs (SME Doyukai), 1947–1999

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015

Kathryn Ibata-Arens  and
Hiromichi Obayashi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Japanese society the pinnacle of economic and political power resides in Tokyo conglomerates and elite ministries: the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) and the Ministry of Finance. Until now, the story of this power arrangement has been told from the perspective of national bureaucrats and big business executives. The image projected to the outside world has been of cooperative, trust-based relational contracting with big business at the top “taking care” of its suppliers and subsidiaries below. The story from the bottom, however, is one of technology expropriation (of patentable technology) and monopsony squeeze (unilateral cost-down demands, for example). Firms unwilling to toe the line have been wholly excluded from access to the benefits reserved for those at the top of the pyramid, where one finds lucrative main bank financing, government support, and copious technological information.

This article offers a historical narrative of the political struggle by independent-minded entrepreneurs in postwar Japan. Central to the struggle has been the challenge of building broad-based coalitions to avoid becoming embedded in these hierarchies while at the same time trying to obtain alternative sources of finance and technological know-how. The most successful example of such efforts is the Association of Small and Medium Size Enterprise Entrepreneurs (SME Doyukai). The SME Doyukai has somehow managed to remain completely independent from the state, while most other small business associations have not. This independence has not been free, and the association has gone through a number of institutional dilemmas as a result. We analyze these dilemmas over time and offer comparative lessons.

Type
Articles
Information
Enterprise & Society , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 128 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2006. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Akimoto, Hideo. Keidanren. Tokyo, 1968.Google Scholar
Arisawa, Hiromi. Nihon Kogyo Tosei Ron [The Control of the Japanese Economy]. Tokyo, 1937.Google Scholar
Asanuma, Banri. Nihon No Kigyososhiki Kakushinteki Tekio No Mekanizumu: Chokitorihikikankei No Kozo to Kino [Innovative Adjustment Mechanism in Japan’s Business Organization: Long-Term Structure and Potential]. Tokyo, 1997.Google Scholar
Cawson, Alan. Organized Interests and the State: Studies in Meso-Corporatism. London, 1985.Google Scholar
Chudokyo 30 Year History Member Committee, ed. Chudokyo No San Ju Nen Shi: Jidai Wo Hajimeru Kigyokatachi No Ayumi [30 Year History of the Chudokyo: The Paths Taken by Entrepreneurs as a New Age Begins]. Tokyo, 1999.Google Scholar
Cox, Andrew W., and Noël O’ Sullivan. The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershot, U.K., 1988.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald Philip. British Factory, Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations. London, 1973.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald Philip. Taking Japan Seriously: A Confucian Perspective on Leading Economic Issues. Stanford, Calif., 1987.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William Miles. The Japanese Business Community and National Trade Policy, 1920–1942. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1989.Google Scholar
Hein, Laura. Reasonable Men, Powerful Words: Political Culture and Expertise in 20th Century Japan. Berkeley, Calif., 2004.Google Scholar
Iguchi, Haruo. Unfinished Business: Ayukawa Yoshisuke and U.S.-Japan Relations, 1937–1953. Cambridge, Mass., 2003.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. Japan’s Public Policy Companies. Washington, D.C., 1978.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. Japan, Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental State. New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Tokyo, 1986.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard. Japan, the System That Soured: The Rise and Fall of the Japanese Economic Miracle. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Koseki, Tomohiro. Monodsukuri No Jidai [The Age of Manufacturing]. Vol. 155. Tokyo, 2002.Google Scholar
Koyama, Keijiro. Sengo Keizai O Sasaeta Hitobito: Kaiko Keidanren [The People Supported in the Postwar (Japanese) Economy: Remembering Keidanren]. Tokyo, 1996.Google Scholar
Marshall, Byron K. Capitalism and Nationalism in Prewar Japan: The Ideology of the Business Elite, 1868–1941. Stanford, Calif., 1967.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Takafusa, Konosuke Odaka, and Madaji Umemura, ed. Nijukozo. Tokyo, 1989.Google Scholar
Nishiguchi, Toshihiro. Strategic Industrial Sourcing: The Japanese Advantage. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass., 1965.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven, Conn., 1982.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca, N.Y., 1998.Google Scholar
Petracca, Mark P. The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, Transforming American Politics. Boulder, Colo., 1992.Google Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee, and the Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California. Contrasting Patterns of Business Organization in Silicon Valley. Berkeley, Calif., 1991.Google Scholar
Schaede, Ulrike. Cooperative Capitalism: Self-Regulation, Trade Association, and the Antimonopoly Law in Japan. New York, 2000.Google Scholar
Smitka, Michael. Competitive Ties: Subcontracting in the Japanese Automotive Industry. New York, 1991.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Philippe C. Schmitter. Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State. London, 1985.Google Scholar
Tamanoi, Yoshihiro, and Tadao Uchida. Nijukozo No Bunseki [An Analysis of the Dual Economy]. Tokyo, 1964.Google Scholar
Tasugi, Kiso. Shitaukeseikogyoron: Keizaihattenkatei Ni Okeru Chushokogyo [Theory of the Manufacturing Subcontracting System: Small and Medium-Sized Manufacturers in the Process of Economic Development]. Tokyo, 1941.Google Scholar
Teraoka, Hiroshi. Nihon No Chusho Kigyo Seisaku [Small and Medium-Sized Business Policy in Japan]. Tokyo, 1997.Google Scholar
Uchida, Kozo. Keidanren to Nihon Keizai No 50-Nen: Mo Hitotsu No Sangyo Seisakushi [Keidanren and 50 Years of the Japanese Economy: Another History of Industrial Policy]. Tokyo, 1996.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Yukio. Nihon Kikaikogyo No Shakaitekibungyokozo: Kaisokozo-sangyoshuseki Kara No Shitaukeseihaiku [The Social System of the Division of Labor in Japan’s Machine Manufacturers: Understanding the Subcontracting System from the Perspective of the Class System and Industrial Accumulation]. Tokyo, 1997.Google Scholar
Whittaker, D. H. Small Firms in the Japanese Economy. Cambridge, U.K., 1997.Google Scholar
Wiarda, Howard J. Corporatism and Comparative Politics: The Other Great “Ism.” Armonk, N.Y., 1997.Google Scholar
Williamson, Peter J. Corporatism in Perspective: An Introductory Guide to Corporatist Theory. London, 1989.Google Scholar
Yamashita, Yasuichi. Chushokigyoundo No Shiki—Okuyama Koete 15 Nen [15 Years of the SME Movement: Getting through the Heart of the Mountain]. Tokyo, 1976.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Anonymous. “Chuseiren Wa Doko E Iku.” [Where Is the SME Political League Going?] Sekai 188, no. 12 (1959): 158–61.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald L. “Big Business Political Influence.” In Modern Japanese Organization and Decision-Making, ed. Ezra F. Vogel. Berkeley, Calif., 1975, pp. 115–45.Google Scholar
Garon, Sheldon, and Mike Mochizuki. “Negotiating Social Contracts.” In Postwar Japan as History, ed. Andrew Gordon. Berkeley, Calif., 1993, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Michael. “Business Alliances and the Strategy of the Japanese Firm.” California Management Review 30, no. 1 (1987): 126–42.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (Nov. 1985): 481–510.Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, J. Rogers, and Leon N. Lindberg. “The Governance of the American Economy: The Role of Markets, Clans, Hierarchies, and Associative Behavior.” In Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, ed. Wolfgang Streeck and Philippe C. Schmitter. London, 1985, pp. 221–54.Google Scholar
Ishida, Takeshi. “The Development of Interest Groups and the Pattern of Political Modernization in Japan.” In Political Development in Modern Japan, ed. Robert Edward Ward and Ardath W. Burks. Princeton, N.J., 1968, pp. 292–336.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Hiroki. “Statements Made at Annual Meeting [Japanese].” Chudokyo, 20 March 1980, p. 156.Google Scholar
Kato, Seiichi. “Chushokigyoundo No Seijitekikeizaitekikiso” [The Political and Economic Foundations of the SME Movement]. Keizaihyoron 9 (Oct. 1960): 38–47.Google Scholar
Kiyodzuka, Jusaku. “Going to the Source of the SME Movement [Japanese].” SME Manager 2 (May 1990): 12–17.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Naoki. “Chusho Kigyo Dantai Soshikiho No Rippo Katei [The Legislative Process of the Medium and Small Enterprise Organization Law]. Shakai Kagaku Kiyo [Social Science Bulletin] (July 1958).Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Naoki. “The Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Organization Law.” In Japanese Politics—An Inside View: Readings from Japan, ed. Hiroshi Itoh. Ithaca, N.Y., 1973, pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
Langdon, Frank C. “Organized Interests in Japan and Their Influence on Political Parties.” Pacific Affairs 34 (Fall 1961): 271–78.Google Scholar
Misawa, Shigeo. “An Outline of the Policy-Making Process in Japan.” In Japanese Politics—An Inside View: Readings from Japan, ed. Hiroshi Itoh. Ithaca, N.Y., 1973, pp. 12–48.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. “The Bureaucratization of Policymaking in Postwar Japan.” American Journal of Political Science 18, no. 4 (1975): 647–64.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. “Corporatism without Labor? The Japanese Anomaly.” In Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation, ed. Philippe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch. London, 1979, pp. 231–70.Google Scholar
Sakai, Kuniyasu. “The Feudal World of Japanese Manufacturing.” Harvard Business Review 68, no. 6 (1990): 58–67.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary. “A Tale of Japanese Technological Diffusion in the Meiji Period.” Journal of Economic History 34, no. 1 (1974): 149–65.Google Scholar
Sone, Yasunori. “Structuring Political Bargains: Government, Gyokai, and Markets.” In Political Dynamics in Contemporary Japan, ed. Gary D. Allinson and Yasunori Sone. Ithaca, N.Y., 1993, pp. 295–305.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Philippe C. Schmitter. “Community, Market, State—and Associations? The Prospective Contribution of Interest Governance to Social Order.” In Private Interest Government: Beyond Market and State, ed. Wolfgang Streeck and Philippe C. Schmitter. London, 1985, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Tayama, Kendo. “Doyukaiundo No Rekishi to Rinen—Sono Senkensei to Fuhensei” [The Foresight and Universality of the History and Ideas of the Doyukai Movement]. Tokyo, Chudokyo (Oct. 1995): 62.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian. “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (March 1997): 35–67.Google Scholar

Government Documents

1957 Economic White Paper, Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Tokyo, 1957.Google Scholar
Unpublished Works and Internal ReportsGoogle Scholar
Chuokai. “All Japan SME Chuokai: 40th Year Anniversary History, Summary Document [Japanese].” Tokyo, 1996.Google Scholar
Chuokai. “All Japan SME Association, Chuokai, Internal Document.” No. 39. Tokyo, 1996.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard F., and Ben Ross Schneider. “Business Associations and Economic Development.” Institute for Policy Research no. 43. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University, 1999.Google Scholar
Doner, Richard F., and Ben Ross Schneider. “The New Institutional Economics, Business Associations and Development.” Business and Society Programme, no. 110 (2000).Google Scholar
Gao, Bai. “The State and the Associational Order of the Economy: The Institutionalization of Cartels and Trade Associations in 1941–1945 Japan.” Paper presented at the Conference on Politics and Varieties of Capitalism, Wissenschaftszentrum, Berlin, 2003.Google Scholar
Kimura, Fukunari. “Subcontracting and the Performance of Small and Medium Firms in Japan.” World Bank, Washington, D.C., 2001.Google Scholar
Kuniyasu, Shizaburo (President, Kyodo Electric). Personal Papers. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Obayashi, Hiromichi. “History of the Doyukai Movement I: From the Birth of the Doyukai Movement to the Formation of the Chudokyo, Reflecting on the Course of the Doyukai Movement Towards the 21st Century: 40 Years after the Establishment of the Doyukai [Japanese].” Paper presented at the Chudokyo annual meeting, Naha, 1997.Google Scholar
Kyoto Doyukai (SME Doyukair). “Regarding Results of Policy Demands.” 2000–2004, Kyoto.Google Scholar
SME Doyukai. Annual meeting minutes. Doyukai National Office, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Yoshiro, ed. “Chuseiren Junenshi” [10 Year History of the SME Political League]. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yuzuru. “The Emergence and Evolution of Peak Associations in Japan and the United States.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1995.Google Scholar

Newspapers

Chudokyo News, Tokyo. 1 Oct 1973.Google Scholar
Chushokigyodoyukai News, Tokyo. 1 Aug. 1965.Google Scholar
Doyukai News, Tokyo. 1969.Google Scholar
National SME Doyukai News, Tokyo. 15 March 1974.Google Scholar
Nihon Keizai Shinbun, Tokyo. 19 Jan. 1957.Google Scholar
Zenchukyoshinbun, Tokyo. 15 June 1955.Google Scholar

Online and Electronic Materials

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Outlook, 2002. URL: http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/9202091E.PDF (accessed 21 Dec. 2005).Google Scholar
Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, Small and Medium Enterprise Agency, “Outline of the Small and Medium Enterprise Basic Law,” 1999. URL: http://www.chusho.meti.go.jp/sme_english/outline/02/01.html (accessed 13 Dec. 2005).Google Scholar
Small and Medium Sized Enterprise Agency. URL: http://www.chusho.meti.go.jp (accessed 9 Dec. 2005).Google Scholar

Oral Histories

Anonymous interview by Kathryn Ibata-Arens with subcontractor of major Japanese electronics manufacturer. Ota Ward, Tokyo, 17 Dec. 1997.Google Scholar
Anonymous interview by Kathryn Ibata-Arens with subcontractor of major Japanese automobile manufacturer. Ota Ward, Tokyo, 12 March 1998.Google Scholar
Anonymous interviews by Kathryn Ibata-Arens with five SME Doyukai members who were formerly exclusive subcontractors for major Japanese electronics manufacturers. Kyoto, 6 Aug. 1998; Osaka, 28 July 1998, 9 Aug. 1998; and Tokyo, March 1998.Google Scholar
Kuniyasu, Shizaburo. Interview with Kathryn Ibata-Arens, 4 Feb. 1998.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Osamu. Interview with Kathryn Ibata-Arens. 29 July 1998.Google Scholar
Wada, Koji. Interview with Kathryn Ibata-Arens. 2 Aug. 2004.Google Scholar