Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-28T01:20:59.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ted Turner’s Corporate Cross-Dressing and the Shifting Images of American Business Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2015


The media celebration of media owner Ted Turner's career and personal biography reflects important shifts in the image of American corporate leadership over the past thirty years.Even aspects of Turner’s life we would normally consider private, such as his sex life and his marriage to Jane Fonda, have taken on this very public function.As a result Turner has served as a transitional figure between two competing visions of corporate identity and responsibility: paternalist managerialism and the “real entity” theory of the firm on the one hand, and on the other, antimanagerial market adventurism and the new economic theory of the firm as a nexus of contracts.The story of how Turner has come to serve this gender-charged iconic function helps clarify how the balance of representational power continues to shift back and forth between these two visions during a period of considerable upheaval in the social, legal, and symbolic construction of the American corporation.

Copyright © Enterprise and Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Bibliography of Works Cited


Alvesson, Mats and Billing, Yvonne Due. Understanding Gender and Organizations. London, 1997.Google Scholar
Arnold, Thurman. The Folklore of Capitalism. New Haven, Conn., 1937.Google Scholar
Berle, Adolf A., and Means, Gardiner C.. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. 1932; New York, 1967.Google Scholar
Billing, Yvonne Due, and Alvesson, Mats. Gender, Managers, and Organizations. Berlin, 1994.Google Scholar
Chernow, Ron. Titan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.. New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Collinson, David L., and Hearn, Jeff, eds. Men as Managers, Managers as Men: Critical Perspectives on Men, Masculinities, and Managements. London, 1996.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, Barbara. Narrating the Organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, N.Y., 1986.Google Scholar
Frank, Thomas. The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and Hip Consumerism. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Robert and Jay|Goldberg, Gerald. Citizen Turner: The Wild Rise of an American Tycoon. New York, 1995.Google Scholar
Henwood, Doug. Wall Street: How It Works and for Whom. London, 1998.Google Scholar
Kwolek-Folland, Angel. Engendering Business: Men and Women in the Corporate Office, 1870–1930. Baltimore, Md., 1994.Google Scholar
Lustig, R. Jeffrey. Corporate Liberalism: The Origins of Modern American Political Theory, 1890–1920. Berkeley, Calif., 1982.Google Scholar
Roper, Michael. Masculinity and the British Organization Man since 1945. New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Sklar, Martin. The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism: The Market, the Law, and Politics. New York, 1988.Google Scholar
Streeter, Thomas. Selling the Air: A Critique of the Policy of Commercial Broadcasting in the United States. Chicago, 1996.Google Scholar
Strouse, Jean. Morgan: American Financier. New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Tullos, Allen. Habits of Industry: White Culture and the Transformation of the Carolina Piedmont. Chapel Hill, N.C., 1989.Google Scholar
Alchian, Armen A., and Demsetz, Harold. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.American Economic Review 62 (1972): 777–95.Google Scholar
Allen, William T.Our Schizophrenic Conception of the Business Corporation.” In Corporate Governance, ed. Monks, Robert A. G. and Minow, Nell. Cambridge, Mass., 1995.Google Scholar
Bratton, William W. Jr.The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History.Stanford Law Review 41 (July 1989): 14711527.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H.The Nature of the Firm.Economica 4 (1937): 390–94.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F., and McAdam, Douglas. “Corporations, Classes, and Social Movements.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 22. Oxford,U.K., 2000, pp. 195238.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald F., Diekmann, Kristina A., and Tinsley, Catherine H.. “The Decline and Fall of the Conglomerate Firm in the 1980s: The Deinstitutionalization of an Organizational Form.American Sociological Review 59 (Aug. 1994): 547–70.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Joel Edan. “Corporation and Kulturkampf: Time Culture as Illegal Fiction.Connecticut Law Review 29 (Fall 1996): 31115.Google Scholar
Guthey, Eric. “Ted Turner’s Media Legend and The Transformation of Corporate Liberalism.Business and Economic History 26 (Fall 1997): 184–99.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Paul M. “From Ambushes to Golden Parachutes: Corporate Takeovers as an Instance of CulturalFraming and Institutional Integration.American Journal of Sociology 91 (Jan. 1986): 800837.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. “Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory.West Virginia Law Review 88 (1985): 173224.Google Scholar
Jensen, Michael, and Meckling, William. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics 3 (1976): 305–60.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Allen, and Zacharias, Lawrence. “From Trust to Contract: The Legal Language of Managerial Ideology, 1920–1980.Business History Review 66 (Autumn 1992): 523–72.Google Scholar
Kerfoot, Deborah, and Knights, David. “Management, Masculinity, and Manipulation: From Paternalism to Corporate Strategy in Financial Services in Britain.Journal of Management Studies 30 (July 1993): 659–78.Google Scholar
McGurl, Mark. “Making It Big: Picturing the Radio Age in King Kong.Critical Inquiry 22 (Spring 1996): 415–45.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan. “The Modern Corporation: Private Agent or Public Actor.Washington and Lee Law Review 50 (Fall 1993): 1673–96.Google Scholar
Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Sept. 1995.Google Scholar
Atlanta Constitution. Jan. 2000.Google Scholar
New York Post. Jan. 2000.Google Scholar
New York Times. May 1985.Google Scholar
Newsweek. July 1996; Aug. 1999.Google Scholar
Playboy. Aug. 1978; Aug. 1983.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle. July 1990.Google Scholar
Time. July 1996; Jan. 2000.Google Scholar
Vanity Fair. April1997.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. March 1997; Jan. 2000.Google Scholar
Washington Post. June 1985.Google Scholar
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Subcommittee on Communications, Hearings on Amendments to the Communications Act of 1934. 10 May–7 June 1979. 96th Cong., 1st sess. Washington, D.C., 1979.Google Scholar
Subcommittee on Communications of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Hearings on the Role of Congress in Regulating Cable Television and the Potential for New Technologies in the Communications System; Part 1, Cable Television Regulation Oversight. 20 July 1976. 94th Cong., 2d sess. Washington, D.C., 1977.Google Scholar
Chen, Joie, and King., LarryTed Turner Giving Away $1 Billion to the United Nations.CNN Breaking News (18 Sept. 1997; 10:30 PM ET).Google Scholar
Donvan, John. “Time Warner and Turner Broadcasting Merger.ABC World News Tonight (22 Sept. 1995; 6:30 PM ET).Google Scholar
Guthey, Eric. Ted Turner: Media Legend/Market Realities (forthcoming). “An Interview With Jane Fonda and Ted Turner.” Larry King Live (8 Oct. 1990).Google Scholar
Jane Fonda.ABC News: Primetime Live (9 Sept. 1993).Google Scholar
Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time, Inc., C.A. 10670 Delaware Court of Chancery (1989).Google Scholar
Text of TBS/Time Warner Merger Press Conference; Transcript <NB> 769–1CNN News (22 Sept. 1995; 1:01 PM ET).+769–1”+CNN+News+(22+Sept.+1995;+1:01+PM+ET).>Google Scholar
Turner, Ted. “National Press Club Luncheon.” Federal News Service (27 Sept. 1994).Google Scholar