Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T06:04:14.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English or Englishes?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2008

François Chevillet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following from Tom McArthur's ‘Models of English’ (ET32, Oct 92), a consideration of such models and the singularity or plurality of the language(s)

Type
Research Article
Information
English Today , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 29 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitchison, J. 1991. Language Change: Progress or Decay? Cambridge: University Press (2nd edition; originally 1981. London: Fontana).Google Scholar
Castagné–Véziès, C. 1992. La logique énonciative des structures relatives ‘déviantes’ en anglais contemporain. Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris III (typed PhD thesis).Google Scholar
Chevillet, F. 1981. Les relatifs au début du moyen-anglais. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Chevillet, F. 1991. Les variétés de l’ anglais. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, J. 1918. Généalogie des mots qui désignent l'abeille d’ après l’ Atlas Linguistique de la France. Paris.Google Scholar
Ihalainen, O. 1980. ‘Relative Clauses in the Dialect of Somerset.’ Neuphilologische Mitteilungen LXXI.Google Scholar
Iyer, P. 1993. ‘The Empire Writes Back.’ Time, 02 8, No. 6.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1909–1949. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles (MEG) London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1941. Efficiency in Linguistic Change. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1970. ‘Historical Linguistics’, in Lyons 1970.Google Scholar
Komatsu, E. & Harris, R. 1993 (to appear). Saussure's Third Course of Lectures on General Linguistics 1910–11. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. 1970. New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
McArthur, T. 1992. ‘Models of English’. ET32, Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T. ed. 1992. The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1975. Evolution des Langues et Reconstruction. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1990. ‘La synchronie dynamique’, La Linguistique 2, Vol.26.Google Scholar
Paul, H. 1880. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. 1982. Socio-Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, A. 1871. Die Darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft. Weimar: Hermann Bohlau (originally 1863).Google Scholar
Shorrocks, G. 1982. ‘Relative Pronouns and Relative Clauses in the Dialect of Farnworth and District (Greater Manchester Country, formerly Lancashire)’. Zeitschrift fur Dialektologie und Linguistik 49/3.Google Scholar
Strang, B. 1970. A History of the English Language. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Van den Eynden, N. 1991. Aspects of Non-Standard Relativization (A study of relative clauses in the Dorset dialect, in the vein of traditional dialectology, with some socio-linguistic refinements). Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (PhD thesis, to appear).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendryes, J. 1923. Le Langage: Introduction linguistique à l'histoire. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar